There's a valid point here, but I don't know if it's just about transition landings.
What I'm often impressed by in these sorts of shots is the potential for disaster that doesn't play out. Reflexively, we're used to seeing videos packed full of stomped bangers. And the way that we're supposed to remember that these things are hard or scary is via a crash section or something, which we can all agree isn't subtle or new.
I was reading a Pat Moore interview last year where he emphasized the need to give the rider the benefit of the doubt with video parts. There's no question that things look smaller on camera, and the skill level of these athletes is immense. The problem of making people care, of tapping into those emotions in creative ways, that's an honorable goal for a ski film. I think Weight pulled that off last year. All.I.Can pulled it off in the environmental department. I can't help but measure ski flicks in light of the ones that creatively and genuinely stir emotion beyond the rudimentary stoke to get out there and ski.
Trends will be trends. Transition landings, redirects, and all that are just one more flavor to binge on, and experience dictates that skiing will often take good ideas and make them unpalatable by overdoing them. Were there too many transition landings? Maybe. Didn't bother me, but it was noted.
The plus side of our silly binge mentality is it practically begs skiers looking for a fresh direction to try new things. Skiers will step up to lead the sport in different directions, and that's only a matter of time and influences. Can't wait to see where it goes next.