A quick word on blocking ads
It looks like you are using an ad blocker. That's okay. Who doesn't? But without advertising revenue, we can't keep making this site awesome. Click the link below for instructions on disabling adblock.
Welcome to the Newschoolers forums! You may read the forums as a guest, however you must be a registered member to post. Register to become a member today!
bahahahhahahahaah
is that all? so, history does tell us more about governing bodies than science ever could...
lol unfortunately that is all it explains.
there's also no evidence that the gov had zero involvement. the only reason that possibility makes no sense to you is because you have yet to learn history lol. jesus christ.......chomsky acknowledges that america has helped and supported travesties throughout history and lies to the masses........
btw, i never ever said chomsky was an authority on the subject lol. that would only be true when comparing to people like you. you are just proving that you are delusional and form answers from speculation, without asking questions.
“We should stop suicide bombers. We should stop sending them bombs, we should stop sending them money, we should divest from suicide bombing governments.” -Noam Chomsky
LOL!!!!!!
happy grazing!
lol why are you even comparing yourself to chomsky and assange? chomsky does not even think they are foolish. he thinks there is not enough critical evidence to distinguish truth. he understands history well and thinks people who jump to conclusions, pointing the finger(like "conspiracy theorists") are foolish.
you're focusing only on the physics of what happened with the buildings while ignoring $ and paper trails. bp's liberty rig won't start production of lisbon zone until there's no oil coming from middle east. convenient, yes........but do you deny this? "control over middle east oil gives us veto powers over what our rivals might do." believing and knowing are not the same. watch these chomsky interviews to get an idea of reality:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VBI9mC77igo
just came across this beauty. who are you to even fully know enough to make that claim absolutely??? wow lol....
wat? i never said that lol what is up with you and your delusions??? i asked if you denied that to be true as an example of convenient "evidence", simply because i felt that you do not ask enough questions to come up with solid conclusions.
you are not mentioning the $ and "paper trails" because you think it makes that movement look stupid? i find that impossibly hard to believe based on your past comments, but ok haha.
bahahahahahha duhhhhhh, convenience is not real evidence.
"Even in controlled experiments you find odd coincidences, unexplained phenomenon."
he literally called that evidence "circumstantial"............
???
...............i already know that, kid. so how did you spin that into him saying that people are "foolish" lol? you can't even properly decipher messages from his words. talk about an "egregious thinker"... not sure what you are trying to convince me of, but if it is that you are egotistic then you are doing well.
duh. it is not real proof, just convenient facts. "What are the chances of their even wanting to bring democracy to the Middle East. They've never done it anywhere else and they're trying to do it now? You see any evidence for it? The only evidence is that they say so." he also said the people who are foolish are the ones who after spending just a few hours reading reports and articles on the internet consider themself to be an expert on the subject and can form an absolute conclusion lol. you fall right into this category, "The US government does bad things, they didn't do this bad thing though."
his whole point was that some things are unexplained. just admit to yourself that you took his words way out of context and that it's possible you don't have all the answers.
