Member of the Month

theabortionator
April, 2025

Online

Welcome to the Newschoolers forums! You may read the forums as a guest, however you must be a registered member to post. Register to become a member today!

Rossignol fks or marker jester?

profile picture
rylee.the.jedi
Posts: 410 - Karma: 368
I was wondering which bindings will be the best for powder and jumps? I have never been on either so I want to know how each one does.
13 years ago
1 0
profile picture
50Kal
Posts: 2836 - Karma: 5,541
Need more information man. Whats your level where you skiing? Whats you h and w? where you riding at ? what you riding most the time?
13 years ago
0 0
profile picture
rylee.the.jedi
Posts: 410 - Karma: 368
My level is aggressive I ride mostly trees and steep bowl
13 years ago
0 0
profile picture
rylee.the.jedi
Posts: 410 - Karma: 368
Sorry I ride whitefish mtn and I ski mostly in trees and bowls but will be hitting jumps also and I'm 5'4" and 105
13 years ago
0 0
profile picture
Wood_Wizard
Posts: 805 - Karma: 899
Maybe the griffon is a better option, you dont need a 16 din or a 14 din bini
13 years ago
0 0
profile picture
Wood_Wizard
Posts: 805 - Karma: 899
Dam you mobile!!!! Binding
13 years ago
0 0
profile picture
rylee.the.jedi
Posts: 410 - Karma: 368
Doesn't fks 14 have a low din also?
13 years ago
0 0
profile picture
50Kal
Posts: 2836 - Karma: 5,541
Here are three super bomber bindings for your size and ability.

http://www.backcountry.com/salomon-sth-12-driver-ski-binding

http://www.backcountry.com/rossignol-axial2-120-ski-binding

http://www.backcountry.com/4frnt-skis-deadbolt-13-ski-binding

Your a bit to light to be going for a 14 din. You can get Any of these bindings with a wider brake.



13 years ago
0 0
profile picture
rylee.the.jedi
Posts: 410 - Karma: 368
Alright thanks ++k to you
13 years ago
0 0
profile picture
Spiri7o
Posts: 2163 - Karma: 1,100
I like the Fks 14s and I don't think the din would be too high for you
13 years ago
0 0
profile picture
50Kal
Posts: 2836 - Karma: 5,541
He said hes 105lbs. Maybe 115 with gear. He doesn't need a 14 din binding.
Why would you chance tea
13 years ago
0 0
profile picture
50Kal
Posts: 2836 - Karma: 5,541
Why would you chance tearing you ACL on the wrong binding?
Even if the OP is hitting Gnarly shit on Whitefish and Big sky he proably wont have his dins set past 10.


There is no reason have 14 din all metal binding at that size.
13 years ago
0 0
profile picture
snakerton
Posts: 2434 - Karma: 1,977
fks park
13 years ago
0 0
profile picture
snakerton
Posts: 2434 - Karma: 1,977
jester pow. fuck mobile.
13 years ago
0 0
profile picture
Newschool_Pope
Posts: 2473 - Karma: 267
im 6 ft 2 180 lb and am perfectly happy with my sth 12 driver.
and ive hit 60 footers with them.
13 years ago
0 0
profile picture
VD.
Posts: 4054 - Karma: 4,565
OP at 105 (115ish with gear) you don't need a high din binding, you may want to look at

-Salomon STH12 Driver (make sure it's the Driver version not Oversize)
-Rossignol Axial2 120/Look PX12 (link for review below)
-Marker Griffon (See if you can get the one with metal in it I think that's the 10-11 mdoel)

13 years ago
0 0
profile picture
Lemuel
Posts: 14544 - Karma: 11,151
Go for the STH driver. The salomon heel is much easier to put on in the powpow, and I personally think its a better binding than the fks but that's debatable.
13 years ago
0 0
profile picture
rylee.the.jedi
Posts: 410 - Karma: 368
Thanks for all the input +k to all of you
13 years ago
0 0
profile picture
foodbuffet11
Posts: 843 - Karma: 84
I'm planning on buying the Marker Griffons. SO I shouldn't get the new models.
13 years ago
0 0
profile picture
50Kal
Posts: 2836 - Karma: 5,541
I would stay away from marker griffon all together, But that just me.

I'd say get Rossi axial or Salomon STH.
13 years ago
0 0
profile picture
YoungChristmas
Posts: 1069 - Karma: 2,147
What binding for me, 145 lbs 5 ft 9 in.
13 years ago
0 0
profile picture
snakerton
Posts: 2434 - Karma: 1,977
sth 14 or 16 depending on what you ski
13 years ago
0 0
profile picture
tomPietrowski
Posts: 7290 - Karma: 18,697

^ Sth 12 Driver will be fine.

Overall there are lots of good bindings, just dont go too high with the Din Range. 12 din bindings will be fine for most skiers, some will need 14's for either weight or ability and even fewer will need a 16 din binding.

13 years ago
1 0
profile picture
50Kal
Posts: 2836 - Karma: 5,541
STH 12 Driver or Axial 12. This is assuming your only in the park on east coast. If your doing trips out west and hitting cliffs maybe STH14.

Other wise STH 12 or Axial 2
13 years ago
0 0
profile picture
traylortrash
Posts: 1935 - Karma: 2,451
to be honest, I weight 135 and have never had a problem with griffons. I understand where all the hate comes from, as they aren't the most durable binding on the market, but weighing 105 I think you would probably be fine. not to mention they're light as shit...
13 years ago
0 0
profile picture
50Kal
Posts: 2836 - Karma: 5,541
I was talking about S.Shields question. Hes 145lbs. I think he's in the weight limit for rossi or salomon.

And as for OP using a marker griffon for a binding He would probably be fine. But he's not gonna be just cruising the Hills or hitting park. He's gonna be Hitting mountains in Whitefish, MT.
Thats why I would recommend the Rossi Axial 12 or Salomon STH 12 Driver for OP. Both of these bindings will out last the griffon in my opinion.

The marker griffon is a binding designed to be affordable. The main group of people I see using are occasional skiers or light weight skiers. If I skied maybe less the 4 times a month a wanted a decent setup I would mount them on some skis. But I ski way more than that. Thats why I dont use them. They seem more geared towards a different category of skiers that I dont fall into.


13 years ago
0 0
profile picture
traylortrash
Posts: 1935 - Karma: 2,451
ah my bad. but yeah I agree the griffon probably isn't the best binding, and you make a good point. I fall into that category of lightweight skiers... but from what I've heard and experienced at least there seems to be no doubt that the rossi or salomon would outlast the griffon, thats true. although OP, like everyone's been saying, make sure you get the driver if you go with salomon... I've had some not-so-fun times with the normal sth toepiece. although maybe the more recent models have improved...?
13 years ago
0 0
profile picture
-Condor-
Posts: 556 - Karma: 285
false. the griffon is in the same category as the axial 120 and sth 12. the squire is designed to be affordable the reason why there are more complaints about them is because the griffon is the number 1 selling binding on the market. there are way more griffons on the slopes than sth's, axials, fks's and so on. there's also a lot of people on here and other sights who hate on it because everyone else hates on it. ive been skiing markers for the past 3 yrs and have never had a single issue with them. ive worked at a ski shop for 5 yrs now and i think ive had 2 griffons come in with a legitimate issue. we sent them back to marker and marker replaced them no questions asked.

to the OP, the griffon, axial 120 and sth12 are all bindings that you would be more than happy on. you dont need anything more than that.
13 years ago
0 0
profile picture
jblaski
Posts: 5569 - Karma: 1,126
I'm 6', 180lbs. Probably close to 200 with all my gear on. I've been riding Griffons for 2 seasons now, +-75 days on that specific binding, and have had absolutely zero problems with them. The Griffin would be a perfectly acceptable binding for any of those kids asking about them.
13 years ago
0 0
profile picture
rylee.the.jedi
Posts: 410 - Karma: 368
Ok it seems like the griffins or the sths thanks everyone
13 years ago
0 0
All times are Eastern (-4); Currently it's 9:54PM