Line Blend vs Sir Francis Bacon

disco2000

Posts: 22 - Karma: 17

Karma: 17

Posts: 22

Lame

Hi
I'm looking to pick up a new pair of skis for this winter, I was gonna go with some Sir Francis Bacons but I am wondering if the 2012 Blends would be "good enough" since I can get them for quite a bit cheaper.
I'm teaching in Hokkaido, so I ski mostly at Niseko, so quite a bit of powder riding, but I also want to ride a bit of park/groomers too of course.
I'm 6' and 140lbs, an intermediate skier. Do you think the Blend's 100mm waist is good enough, or will the SFB's be worth the extra dough?
Also, size recommendations would be appreciated too. I hear that the SFB's ride quite short, so I was thinking the 184cm, but is that the case for the Blends as well, or will 178's suffice?

Aug 10 2012 4:45AM

0 0

TheWakes.

Posts: 685 - Karma: 235

Karma: 235

Posts: 685

Ridiculous

if you want to spend the majority of your time outside the park, having more width with the bacons will be the way to go. if you like to have a ski that will feel closer to a park ski, get the blends. dont get me wrong, they ski fine, but the flex is softer than the bacons, making them a bit less sturdy at speed. still good ski tho.

Aug 10 2012 9:36AM

0 0

llambert

Posts: 1005 - Karma: 81

Karma: 81

Posts: 1005

Insane

get the blends, theyre a great quiver and you can still ride park with them, the bacons are a powder only ski

Aug 10 2012 9:52AM

0 0

disco2000

Posts: 22 - Karma: 17

Karma: 17

Posts: 22

Lame

Thanks for the input so far.
I'll probably be riding about 50% powder, 30% groomer, 20% park, so I'm leaning towards the SFB at the moment.
Any suggestions about sizing for both skis? Would the 184 SFB be too long for my weight?

Aug 10 2012 10:14AM

0 0

Legoman

Posts: 533 - Karma: 13

Karma: 13

Posts: 533

Ridiculous

At your specs I wouldn't even bother thinking about the 178, get the 184.

Aug 10 2012 10:36AM

0 0

Twig

Posts: 6430 - Karma: 60,416

Karma: 60,416

Posts: 6430

No Life

Definitely 184 and definitely SFB.
I'm considering swiching from Bacons to Blends but I ski 95% park, and even then I'm not sure. For 50% pow def bacon, maybe even opus.

Aug 10 2012 11:33AM

0 0

patsfanwho

Posts: 68 - Karma: 20

Karma: 20

Posts: 68

Wannabe

where are you going to mount the blends? -4 or move em' up?

Aug 10 2012 12:40PM

0 0

disco2000

Posts: 22 - Karma: 17

Karma: 17

Posts: 22

Lame

Alright, so I can get a pretty good deal on 2012 Blends in 178, for my size (6', 140lbs) would that be a bit short, or would that be fine for riding powder but doing nothing too aggresive?

Aug 29 2012 6:56AM

0 0

BjornR

Posts: 141 - Karma: 14

Karma: 14

Posts: 141

Pro

I ride 75% park, 25% all mtn with my bacons. Best park ski I ever owned, even tho they aren't marketed as park skis. Low swingweight and I love the flex. Mounted at midsole(-2cm from true center). I use them as one ski quiver. I don't even bring my park skis with me anymore, they always ended up being unused.

My 178 measures 174cm true length so they will be pretty short, 184 should suit you better.

Aug 29 2012 9:14AM

0 0

[J_Gasper]

Posts: 2983 - Karma: 1,594

Karma: 1,594

Posts: 2983

Addict

Get bacons. I wouldnt consider anything smaller for japan.

Aug 29 2012 10:43AM

0 0

NoSkillsCrew

Posts: 1207 - Karma: 2,126

Karma: 2,126

Posts: 1207

Insane

Dude you are 6 foot how have you ever ridden anything shorter than 180?

I would say that if you are teaching have a ski with a more traditional side cut would help with all the FIS bullshit.

184 bacons all day long. Blends are way softer than the bacons so good for park but not so good for drops or crazy steeps or whatever.

Aug 29 2012 11:17AM

0 0

disco2000

Posts: 22 - Karma: 17

Karma: 17

Posts: 22

Lame

Alright, you guys have set me straight. I will stop being cheap and get the Bacons.

Aug 29 2012 5:06PM

0 0

Line_Skis

Posts: 1992 - Karma: 37,808

Karma: 37,808

Posts: 1992

Insane

yay .. thanks NS community for the help and thanks for riding Line!

Aug 29 2012 7:45PM

0 0

jmasterp

Posts: 1976 - Karma: 233

Karma: 233

Posts: 1976

Insane

You are a fucking dumb ass. You can ride Bacons where ever, they're an awesome quiver killer, the opus, not as much.

Aug 29 2012 8:38PM

0 0

llambert

Posts: 1005 - Karma: 81

Karma: 81

Posts: 1005

Insane

thats a mature response, dont politely correct me just instantly calll out my intellect, cool bro

Aug 31 2012 9:32PM

0 0

50Kal

Posts: 2835 - Karma: 5,534

Karma: 5,534

Posts: 2835

Addict

OP if your from Japan it be worth it to get two skis. A park/groomers/carving ski and then a Powder ski. Your in japan. It's a powder heaven. Your gonna want a super fat deep pow ski. But you might be from out of country and cant afford to bring back more than one ski. Or you just might tight on money.

If your set on one pair of skis SFB at 184 would be an awesome do every thing ski.

I would recommend picking up some type of rock skis for work. Many of days especially this last year here in CO where I wish I had a crappy pair of work ski to keep my good ski free of core shots. If you working on the mountain you could probably find something to use cheap or free.

Aug 31 2012 10:25PM

0 0

Rodigan

Posts: 1306 - Karma: 1,851

Karma: 1,851

Posts: 1306

Insane

Bacons are the best skis i have ever rode on , i am 5,9 and the 178's basically are the same size as my ninthward 176 park skis ............so definately go for the 184

Sep 5 2012 7:57AM

0 0