Hey guys,
I have done a little bit of research from previous threads, but I have a few specific questions. I go to Colorado every year, so I want to change it up. The areas I am looking at are:
Montana
Utah
Washington
British Columbia
I know each of these areas have their ups and downs. A few things to keep in mind, I want to keep it as cheap as possible, Im looking for tree skiing mainly, and I hate crowds.
Montana: I have always wanted to hit up Big Sky. I figure if I stay right around the resort, I can hit up Bridger Bowl, which is nice to ski both resorts. I think White Fish is to far away, correct? I like that Big Sky is known for their steeps, and that Bridger Bowl is known for their powder.
Utah: All the resorts are pretty close to each other. I think I would mostly be at Alta, but I would defiantly go to PC for a day for the experience. From what I hear, the snow is typically great. However, last year was really shitty for all of Utah?
Washington: More of a ski destination for locals. Gets a lot of snow, and cheap lift tickets. Not to many places to stay around Baker and Stevens. People say its really a hit or miss, which can frighten me.
British Columbia: Ideally, this would be my #1 choice. If I were to go, I would want to go to Whistler, but I really would like to go to Revy. I feel like thats A TON of driving. Also, I feel like lodging would be expensive.
That is my basic knowledge on all of those locations.
+K to whoever helps
Spark notes: Out of Montana, Utah, Washington, and B.C. which area should I go to for least amount of crowds, good snow, and tree skiing?
