Posts: 10447
-
Karma: 10,018
Purely skiing - SLC.
Living in a city with good skiing a 1-2hr drive - Vancouver, Seattle, Portland, Denver all apply because they are each sick cites for the right person. The cultures of each are definitely different so, honestly, if you can visit them, do it. SF is an amazing city, but drive to tahoe is pretty long.
SLC vs the rest basically comes down to how much you value skiing relative to the advantages of living in a metro area that is truly a city. Not saying SLC is a bad place, but when comparing it as a city to any of the metros of 2 mil pop or above, there really just isn't a contest as to what they offer.
As for Denver vs Portland vs Seattle vs Vancouver vs SF....all really different cities with hugely different cost of living, pace of life, metro population, culture, etc.
SF is huge, has pretty much everything you could ever want in a city, but bay area is packed with people so if you don't like a living in a very vibrant, fast paced (and $$$ as fuck) city, then probably not the best fit. Long way to the mountains.
Vancouver is pretty amazing, but very high cost of living. More cosmopolitan, has a huge downtown population, good food, very multicultural. Plus whistler...
Denver has tons of skiing options within a 1-2hr drive. City is pretty cool, though I personally don't like it as much as Portland or Seattle. Some great neighborhoods though, pretty good food, good job market, most people love the weather. Tons of outdoor activities, tons of sun. I don't think I will ever leave the PNW, but if I did, it would probably be to go back to CO and live in Denver.
After Portland, Seattle is my favorite city. Metro is over 4 mil, so while it won't feel as busy as SF, there are definitely more people around, busier streets, more traffic, etc vs denver/portland. Tons of great neighborhoods, good bars, job market is strong. Cost of living is high, but not SF or Vancouver. Bit hipster these days, but no portland. I grew up in Boulder, went to college in WA. Honestly would take skiing in WA over CO. You just ski way, way more powder. If I skied park or hated powder, colorado has a ton of sunny days.
I live in Portland and while the skiing is better than people say if you know where to go, it isn't as good as it is out of Denver, Seattle, or Vancouver (SF is too far of a drive to count here). But as far as living in a city goes, Portland kills it (for me). Smaller than SF and Seattle so traffic is way better. Less people around so sometimes the city doesn't feel as alive as Vancouver, Seattle, or SF, but it is a fairly compact city with tons of great neighborhoods extremely close in. Each neighborhood has its own unique vibe, but they just sort of flow together due to how compact the city is. Downtown is manageable and while the skyline is a joke, is probably one of the better street-level cities in NA. Great bars, amazing food (not fine dining, but in the $10-$30/plate range, literally an endless number of amazing restaurants) pace of life is busy but not chaotic. Tons of beer, bars everywhere.
There are a lot of times where I've considered moving back up to Seattle, and I know I would enjoy living here, but I don't think seattle has the balance of city life without the choas that comes with supporting a metro area of 4 mil vs 2 mil. Cost of living is cheaper in PDX, though job market is probably the worst of the bunch and there ARE hipsters everywhere. You just learn to laugh at them and enjoy life.
Weather wise - Vancouver, Seattle, & Portland are functionally the same. I would love SF weather as it pretty much never gets hot (pretty sure it only gets above 80 a few times per year, but someone correct me if I'm wrong). Denver is hot in the summer, cold in the winter. I don't mind the snow, but 90-95 degree heat sucks donkey balls. Portland/Seattle/Vancouver are 40-50 and raining from October to May (this does mean boatloads of snow in the mountains), but from June to September it is pretty much sunny and 80 degrees. I still wish it never got above 70, but most people think the summers here are pretty much perfect.
I could honestly live and be happy in any of the actual cities you listed. Having been around Denver, Seattle, and Portland a lot, I live in the one that felt best suited for me.
SLC...I could spend a winter there before wanting to move somewhere where the non-skiing parts of my life would be better off.
That is just me, though. Lots of people love living in SLC. I just think if you are a city-person you are going to be missing out on what the other options offer.
Oh and one last thing - if you CAN get a job right now in any of those cities, I would probably take it regardless of the city (and if you have multiple options, well done!). Finding a job, especially without a masters (not sure if you have one or not), is not always easy.
Hope that helps, good luck!