Nikon D3100 vs Canon t2i vs Canon t3

Posts: 1902 - Karma: 1,771

Karma: 1,771

Posts: 1902

Insane

the only concern i have with the d3100 is the video mode. the auto focus is kinda noisy and its not the best, but other than that it seems like a great camera

Jul 10 2012 6:20PM

0 0

Posts: 31064 - Karma: 29,404

Karma: 29,404

Posts: 31064

Basement Dweller

oh man...

-Do not buy a dslr for video if you are going to use it's autofocus feature
-Do not buy a dslr for video if you only have $600 or so dollars
-Do not buy a dslr for video
-Do buy a camcorder with good autofocus that wont need 1k+ in accessories to work well

Jul 10 2012 6:28PM

0 0

Posts: 1902 - Karma: 1,771

Karma: 1,771

Posts: 1902

Insane

+k for the advice

Jul 10 2012 6:29PM

0 0

Posts: 31064 - Karma: 29,404

Karma: 29,404

Posts: 31064

Basement Dweller

its*

fak

Jul 10 2012 6:32PM

0 0

Posts: 1902 - Karma: 1,771

Karma: 1,771

Posts: 1902

Insane

i wasnt planning on using autofocus it was just someting i came across when I was looking at the camera. Im also planning on using it for pictures heavily, I just wanted to make sure that it was understood that I will be using it for video also. The reason I want to stay away from camcorders though is that I want to ability to change lenses. And I have $600 now but Its not like I would be spending more on it down the road. I already have basic things (tripod, dolly and im making a steadycam). +k anyway tho

Jul 10 2012 6:35PM

0 0

Posts: 1902 - Karma: 1,771

Karma: 1,771

Posts: 1902

Insane

im not just buying it for video

Jul 10 2012 7:06PM

0 0

Posts: 31064 - Karma: 29,404

Karma: 29,404

Posts: 31064

Basement Dweller

Buy a cheaper camcorder (believe me there are plenty that will do what you want them to do even for a good price) and a used DSLR

Jul 10 2012 8:19PM

0 0

Posts: 1902 - Karma: 1,771

Karma: 1,771

Posts: 1902

Insane

basically my question here is should I get the best camera in my list (t2i) and just use the kit lens until i can save up more for a better lens set up and other accessories, or spend less money and settle on a camera that is not as good as the t2i (but still pretty good) and buy some lenses, a fisheye etc.

Jul 10 2012 8:19PM

0 0

Posts: 31064 - Karma: 29,404

Karma: 29,404

Posts: 31064

Basement Dweller

thats the thing, you don't have the budget to afford either option. and "settling" is something I don't suggest doing

Jul 10 2012 8:20PM

0 0

Posts: 1902 - Karma: 1,771

Karma: 1,771

Posts: 1902

Insane

wut

Jul 10 2012 8:23PM

0 0

Posts: 1902 - Karma: 1,771

Karma: 1,771

Posts: 1902

Insane

my bad i read it as SETTING.

Jul 10 2012 8:23PM

0 0

Posts: 3955 - Karma: 3,192

Karma: 3,192

Posts: 3955

Addict

then why was it a concern for you?

Jul 10 2012 8:30PM

0 0

Posts: 1902 - Karma: 1,771

Karma: 1,771

Posts: 1902

Insane

just something that i noticed. i might have used it at one point or another, just want to make sure i know what im getting.

Jul 10 2012 8:53PM

0 0

TimRiley

Posts: 1873 - Karma: 1,327

Karma: 1,327

Posts: 1873

Insane

I got the t2i over the t3 because it takes better action photos. Very happy with quality, don't know about the nikkon. Good luck

Jul 10 2012 9:50PM

0 0

Posts: 1902 - Karma: 1,771

Karma: 1,771

Posts: 1902

Insane

yeah, the t2i is definetly the better camera, i was just trying to see if getting the t3 would justify itself because i would be able to get accessories and stuff. +K

Jul 10 2012 9:56PM

0 0

Posts: 1902 - Karma: 1,771

Karma: 1,771

Posts: 1902

Insane

ok nvm im getting a refurbished t2i with the lens kit for $440 at the canon online store. You can get 20% basically any purchase of a refurbished camera for today only. the promo code is SLR712. you also get free shipping with it.

Jul 11 2012 9:24AM

0 0

MatRich

Posts: 4789 - Karma: 1,813

Karma: 1,813

Posts: 4789

No Life

so many stupid comments in here, system overload, I dont even know where to start.

Jul 11 2012 10:31AM

0 0

VB-Films

Posts: 8 - Karma: 11

Karma: 11

Posts: 8

Newb

I bought the t2i and couldn't be happier. Such a sick camera. I bought a fisheye adapter to my 18-55mm kit lens and also a 50mm 1.8. Go for it!

Jul 11 2012 11:38AM

0 0

Posts: 3955 - Karma: 3,192

Karma: 3,192

Posts: 3955

Addict

You might want to replace that with a real fisheye like the rokinon 8mm. fisheye adapters don't look too good...

Jul 11 2012 11:46AM

0 0

Posts: 3955 - Karma: 3,192

Karma: 3,192

Posts: 3955

Addict

i think you said you're going with a t2i, but just be warned you won't be using the autofocus with that either.

If you want to autofocus while shooting video with a DSLR (T2i or any other, barring the Sony cameras), it needs to be BEFORE you press record. You're probably used to the way a camcorder does autofocus, which is smooth, subtle, and silent. A T2i is loud and jittery when it does autofocus. It throws the image way out of focus, then kind of stutters its way to finding correct focus. It also momentarily brightens the image a shit ton in order to perform autofocus. DSLR autofocus is bad in general, so just know that buying a T2i (or most other DSLR's) means losing the ability to have usable autofocus while shooting.

Jul 11 2012 11:53AM

0 0

Posts: 1902 - Karma: 1,771

Karma: 1,771

Posts: 1902

Insane

thanks for the heads up. Ive been doing a lot of research about this and i think that the t2i is the camera for me. im not worried about autofocus or the lack of autofocus, because ill be using manual focus instead. plus, a $447 deal on a t2i is pretty hard to pass up. Thanks for the information and participating in this thread, +K

Jul 11 2012 12:31PM

0 0

Posts: 3955 - Karma: 3,192

Karma: 3,192

Posts: 3955

Addict

well thats somewhat insulting

Jul 11 2012 8:40PM

0 0

MatRich

Posts: 4789 - Karma: 1,813

Karma: 1,813

Posts: 4789

No Life

hey, will and eheath are two solid helpers and have a better reputation than il ever have with video. sorry, I thought I was still at random dude reputation for this stuff. didnt know I had an image to protect.

heres some context about my random bitchery in this thread: I sell cameras for a living right now. Im constantly talking about which camera for which person... I love doing it. However it is inevitable that I get morons at work getting a 5D and asking me where the zoom button is ( true story) or the classic whats better nikon or canon? anyone on newschoolers who sais either nikon or canon is a fucking twat in my oppinion but thats not important.

I also deal a lot with "pro photographers/ cinematographers" who buy a d3100 and shoot on automatic. I have to deal with these idots, not insult them so I dont lose the sale but at the same time want to rip his fucking eyeballs out because assholes like him take contracts away from me with my sideline video services.

Anyways all of this to say, my frustrations come from work and were lashed out at this thread. for that I am sorry. Im flattered to hear im well regarded in these forums so Il try to keep my shit at home and keep my words in here helpfull.

Jul 11 2012 11:27PM

0 0

B.Taillefer

Posts: 420 - Karma: 321

Karma: 321

Posts: 420

Ridiculous

Why wouldn't someone buy a DSLR for video? This is not to say someone with a minimal budget such as OP, but I mean someone serious with a real budget and knowledge of cinematography.

Aren't some DSLR's like the GH2 actually better for video than they are for stills?

Jul 12 2012 5:01PM

0 0

Posts: 3955 - Karma: 3,192

Karma: 3,192

Posts: 3955

Addict

no worries man, i should have said haha or something to show i wasn't genuinely offended. i figured you weren't being literal

Jul 12 2012 5:15PM

0 0

erikK

Posts: 3245 - Karma: 2,329

Karma: 2,329

Posts: 3245

Addict

-a big reason for me is that dslr's are a bitch to use. for the most part, they don't have the video features of a real video camera like zebras, peaking, waveform monitors, etc. yes with magic lantern you can get some and I know the GH2 has peaking and some other things as well.
-dslr's also are notorious for producing horrible moire and rolling shutter while shooting video.
-codecs. i'm pretty sure straight up avchd tends to be better than h.264 which i THINK is just a modified version of avchd. i'm not too knowledgable on that stuff so i don't want to say much

-i wouldn't buy a gh2 for stills. i would buy one for video. it has an electronic viewfinder instead of optical like most dslr's, it's fucking whack to look through for photos, but unlike optical viewfinders, it can be used for video. it also does not have a very well set up body for photos in terms of external controls, etc.

Jul 13 2012 3:14AM

0 0

michael_bc

Posts: 1396 - Karma: 788

Karma: 788

Posts: 1396

Insane

A big reason for me would be that DSLR bodies are cheap and you can swap them out when obsolete.

One of my biggest regrets from the past is buying a GS500 camcorder, which was really expensive and completely obsolete after two years.

Jul 13 2012 7:26AM

0 0

*KLULESS*

Posts: 306 - Karma: 3,874

Karma: 3,874

Posts: 306

Loner

t2i shoots a 60fps and the 3100 doesn't

Jul 13 2012 2:37PM

0 0

B.Taillefer

Posts: 420 - Karma: 321

Karma: 321

Posts: 420

Ridiculous

I actually have a GH2, and yeah it does have a form of zebras, as well as peaking. I find that the stills it takes aren't great at all, but I love it for video, especially after I hacked it. It also has noticeably less moire than other DSLR's, but rolling shutter is still an issue.

Also you are correct in that AVCHD is h.264 just inside a Mpeg transport system, so they are very similar codecs, but in my opinion AVCHD is the better codec, especially if converted to Prores as it just holds up so much better in the editing process, and is very noticeable in grading.

I just think that DSLR's have been getting a lot of hate recently, and yet I don't see why. They obviously aren't for someone brand new to filming as it is an expensive investment, but I think someone with the money and skill can produce astounding work with a DSLR, and personally I see them as holding more creative potential than straight up video cameras because of the ability to swap lenses. This is from personal experience as I have worked on both prosumer video cameras, like the Canon XF100, which is the camera one of my friends has, as well as DSLR's like the GH2 as well as 60D

I love them both, and the XF100 is actually much easier to use and yet still produces a fantastic image, but with knowledge and skill I just feel the creative potential of DSLR's is much more, and can produce amazing shots.

Jul 13 2012 3:58PM

0 0