Member of the Month

KilaTsunami
October, 2024

Online

Welcome to the Newschoolers forums! You may read the forums as a guest, however you must be a registered member to post. Register to become a member today!

Canon T3 vs. T3i

profile picture
E__
Posts: 5751 - Karma: 4,635
I'm about to buy a new SLR but I have a couple questions regarding the differences that I hope some of you can help me out with.

I can see the differences written down in the description of the cameras but I want to know how much that affects the quality of the footage/photo (in this case the T3). I've worked with the T3i before and it's great but the price range between the two is $200 and I'm wondering if the T3i is really that much better or if I could get away with buying the T3. +k for serious responses.

I know this could be put in M&A but my questions wouldn't be answered for days.

Thanks.
Jul 9 2012 6:09PM
0 0
profile picture
alex=
Posts: 1738 - Karma: 2,835
It doesn't take days in M&A... lots of better answers you'd be getting there too.

Go to site discussion and ask for a move, it's not that big of a deal unless it's urgent, for a deal or something.
Jul 9 2012 6:11PM
0 0
profile picture
E__
Posts: 5751 - Karma: 4,635
It is urgent.
Jul 9 2012 6:49PM
0 0
profile picture
.Duncan.
Posts: 1375 - Karma: 459
the t3 is shit for video, if you want to save money get a refurbished t2i, it will produce the same as a t3i.

Also, put this in media and arts I check there before NSG any day and there are way more knowledgeable people in M&A.
Jul 9 2012 6:56PM
0 0
profile picture
FatWhore
Posts: 2213 - Karma: 1,098
This. Spend the extra $200 for a WAY better camera. A good rule is dont cheap out when your buying camera gear.
Jul 9 2012 6:59PM
0 0
profile picture
rudedog41
Posts: 605 - Karma: 135
definitely get a t2i unless you need the tilt screen, it's a good option and shaves off some moola of the price tag for the same quality video...plus there's magic lantern which i don't believe you can get for the t3
Jul 9 2012 7:39PM
0 0
profile picture
caliB
Posts: 26 - Karma: 104
i have the T3i, much better and definitely worth it
Jul 9 2012 8:04PM
0 0
profile picture
E__
Posts: 5751 - Karma: 4,635
Alright well I just bought a T3i as well as a bigger lens. Thanks everyone.
Jul 9 2012 9:22PM
0 0
profile picture
oil.
Posts: 2255 - Karma: 1,254
what lens did you end up getting?
good choice bud
Jul 9 2012 9:56PM
0 0
profile picture
E__
Posts: 5751 - Karma: 4,635
I just got the EFS 55-250mm lens. Perfect for what I need zoom for.
Jul 9 2012 10:59PM
0 0
profile picture
FatWhore
Posts: 2213 - Karma: 1,098
You have much to learn...
Jul 9 2012 11:35PM
0 0
profile picture
E__
Posts: 5751 - Karma: 4,635
You couldn't tell from this whole thread?
Jul 10 2012 12:03AM
0 0
profile picture
PacificRimJob
Posts: 24725 - Karma: 29,944
Yeah... you're going to want to invest in something else optically. 55-250 is almost useless for film.
Jul 10 2012 2:44AM
0 0
profile picture
michael_bc
Posts: 1386 - Karma: 720
Why do you say that just a 50mm lens is enough to start with in one thread, and then here you say that a 55-250mm is almost useless?
Jul 10 2012 7:01AM
0 0
profile picture
[J_Gasper]
Posts: 2983 - Karma: 1,594
A 50mm is enough to start with. I actually find that it makes you a better videographer due to having to work aroud your lens, instead of just sitting in one spot and zooming in and out on your zoom lens. Just my 2 cents.
Jul 10 2012 8:39AM
0 0
profile picture
FatWhore
Posts: 2213 - Karma: 1,098
Because the 50mm will have much better quality (shaper), less expensive, and faster. Your regularr 55-250mm wont be very sharp at all for video and maybe even pictures.
Jul 10 2012 11:24AM
0 0
profile picture
michael_bc
Posts: 1386 - Karma: 720
It's the other way round, man. Pictures require more resolving power than video.

I'm not saying that the 55-250 has kick ass optics, but I disagree with the statement that it is useless for a beginning photographer/videographer. Some people need to get their heads out of their asses with their recommendations. For me, a tele lens is one of the, if not the most useful lens for skiing. I also started with a cheap 55-200 before I upgraded to a faster tele. I do not regret that purchase, and neither should the OP...
Jul 10 2012 1:08PM
0 0
profile picture
CliffyByro
Posts: 5678 - Karma: 3,903
they're completely different lenses. i agree with you that a tele is important (bearing in mind i know nothing about video, i'm a photographer) but at least get a good tele, eg the 70 - 200mm f4 (thats directed at OP)
Jul 10 2012 3:09PM
0 0
profile picture
E__
Posts: 5751 - Karma: 4,635
I'm still going to stick with the lens I got for now because I'm just starting, and to be honest I don't mind if the quality isn't near as good as other lenses, I'm fine with what I have for my level of filmingl. Of course I'm going to upgrade at a certain point whether it's just a lens or a whole different camera, but for now thanks everyone for the feedback.
Jul 11 2012 6:47PM
0 0
All times are Eastern (-5)