Man kills Two, injures Seven in Night Club Shooting

How is that fear mongering lol? Did that story frighten you?

My point is that people have guns, incase you didn't catch that. If you so firmly believe that guns aren't tools then we can safely assume that you don't ever eat meat. We are not all vegetarians like you.  

I should have been a little bit more specific when defining killing as murder and not manslaughter. Still, if you kill someone with intension, such as in this case, there is something seriously wrong with you and you don't deserve to live, while these other poor people and they're families have  to deal with the results of your actions for the rest of they're lives. So many people die around the world each day that one more death, and to a killer at that, wouldn't even show up on anyones radar. Life would go on as normal and justice would be served

Just like how participants in professional sports are not chaged or arrested for fighting and injuring, laws are made such that members of the military won't be subject to punishment when an enemy is killed. Of course if your mother is killed you are not obligated to kill the person who did it. there would be no reason to when you know they will be sentnced to death under the law. And just like it has been done before and in some places still is today, who ever injects the lethal shot to the killer is doing so under the law as it is they're job. I'm not saying it has to be used for every single case of a killing such as in situaions where someone was defending themselves. But in cases such as this or when there is rape/murder of children, i say put them to death because they're just a waste of skin

You must be a yuppie, kid. The only other possibility is that at some point in your life you were conditioned to be a brain-dead pussy. I apologize that I upset you.

"There's more to this thread than gun laws." 

Cool story brah but all I said was that you would probably ban bows and arrows and you do not eat meat due to your stance on guns. They were just assumptions but are you saying that I'm a liar? You do eat meat?   

Not entirely.You don't want the freedom to use a gun so any rational person could only assume that you don't eat meat...

Where do you think that meat came from? Only a yuppie would believe that the meat was not from an animal that was killed...

Bows and arrows are just like guns. Why don't you feel the need to demonize those? They are also tools meant for killing.

By the way I never attempted to join your discussion with whoever else is involved. It should be clear enough that you are a giant hypocrit, which I have been pointing out. You eat meat, yet you are against the killing of that animal. The only possible way for you to not be a hypocrit is if you are brain-dead or if you were subject to lots of brainwashing. (you said you weren't)

LOL! You must live in a fucking barrel. You are making the ridiculously stupid assumption that every meat-eating person relies on farms and supermarkets like you do. Clearly you have lived the life of a yuppie for far too long. What about more primitive people that depend on only the materials which they possess. No tools means no food for many people. Not everybody has the luxury to live like you, kid.

Oh and you're a rotten idiot who can't even spell cohesive right. Get back under your bridge.

Ok leave out the "primitive" part if you need to. Not all people rely on supermarkets and farms like you do. You don't have to take part in the hunting. But if you eat meat then you should instinctly know that it came from an animal that was killed by a weapon like a gun or a bow. How can you justify wanting to get rid of those tools? Are you seriously going to start throwing javelins at boars if you need to hunt? Or running after them with a blade and throwing rocks at them lol. The point of tools is to make shit easier.

"Let's learn a bit more about you, then. You don't rely on farms and supermarkets for nutrition like I do. Where are you from, why should you need weapons to bring food to the table?"

How about looking at it from a general point of view. I live in Canada so I have many resources and choices. Many people do not have these same luxuries though and they do require tools to put food on the table. You keep proving how dumbed-down you are. I would like to call you ignorant, as much as I despise using that word on ns, but that would be too generous. You are just dumb. 

You can keep telling me to fuck myself and to fuck off like a crybaby but that isn't going to fix your problem of having little to no education and it just makes me laugh at how upset you are anyway. Get back under your bridge and pick up a book, kid.

You have told me to both fuck off and to fuck myself already, you must be upset about something.

What's wrong with generalizing a generalized situation? Maybe I am both an occasional hunter to save $ and a modern person who uses resources? Who cares?

So let's say you take away their guns like you want. Now they have to use less advanced tools like bows and arrows. Oh wait, you said you wouldn't let them use those either since they are like guns. So now they are using javelins and blades. (which is not without basis since i said, "leave out primitive if you need to")

So you're okay with not having the right to have a gun but letting other people have them? I'm with you, I would totally get rid of guns if that meant all guns in the entire world. But you can get rid of them in a country and they will unfortunately always exist somewhere else. :(

One love, smoke herb.