Although I should probably clarify what I mean by 'addressed this in my post'.
Aquinas and the enlightened monks are NOT to be considered on the side of the dogmatic church, and served their days founding philosophical theories to justify the existence of God and its morals, not espousing the morals themselves. When you speak to the Ontological or Teleological arguments put forth by Aquinas, you are speaking to what I was saying before - that our philosophies are built upon centuries and centuries of debate and work. HOWEVER the Bible has not changed in this time. The interpretations may, but the core morality, is still implied and employed in society's religious folks, which is intellectually retarded (in the def. sense).
Be honest. To THIS DAY we are debating Leviticus, Timothy I, and Corinthians in our government. Don't tell me the Bible has been reinterpreted when there is clear evidence that the same morality espoused in the Bible is being debated and employed to this day.