Member of the Month

hi_vis360
November, 2024

Online

Welcome to the Newschoolers forums! You may read the forums as a guest, however you must be a registered member to post. Register to become a member today!

Line Reactor's

profile picture
joshbryant
Posts: 2133 - Karma: 228
The most amazing breakthrough in skiing technology since the twintip. The way it releases is incredible. And anyone who says it's heavy hasn't held it. It weighs almost the same as a look Pivot.

I ski switch.
Sep 23 2004 12:25PM
0 0
profile picture
dawilltoski
Posts: 1649 - Karma: 10
fo real, does it sit high or same as regular bindings?




If you suck my soul I will lick your funky emotions.
-Funkadelic
Sep 23 2004 12:26PM
0 0
profile picture
dspin7x
Posts: 6414 - Karma: 63
Ill believe its not another pile of crap put out by line when I ski it.

'Don't fuck with me 'cause I'm going to delete everything you ever post and have ever posted - Flanker, A moderator
Sep 23 2004 12:30PM
0 0
profile picture
joshbryant
Posts: 2133 - Karma: 228
It's a little higher than regular, but you've got a lot of absorption underfoot. And the freedom plate has very minimal lift. I put the freedom plate and the binding on some new AR5's, and it still wasn't much more lift than any other binding.

I ski switch.
Sep 23 2004 12:35PM
0 0
profile picture
dawilltoski
Posts: 1649 - Karma: 10
im putting mine on lines, so no freedom plate.




If you suck my soul I will lick your funky emotions.
-Funkadelic
Sep 23 2004 12:52PM
0 0
profile picture
telestar6
Posts: 2102 - Karma: 44
Yeah I want to check those out. A local shop just go them in yesterday and I wanna go see 'em.

I think rails in general are just a phase. - Anthony Boronowski

You know my steez.
Sep 23 2004 1:06PM
0 0
profile picture
LPT_311
Posts: 2239 - Karma: 12
I just ordered some for My 05 Mike Nicks. Are they durable, do they hold well? Will they stay on my skis?
For me theres skiing, nothing more, nothing less. And it consumes me, every day im out there, and every day im not
Sep 23 2004 3:14PM
0 0
profile picture
LPT_311
Posts: 2239 - Karma: 12
yeah i've heard the originals are fuckin crap compaired to this years
For me theres skiing, nothing more, nothing less. And it consumes me, every day im out there, and every day im not
Sep 23 2004 5:06PM
0 0
profile picture
fluff
Posts: 1471 - Karma: 221
the originals were the shit for normal usage. what we;re into, and what most Line skiers are into... is not normal. this revamped binding will take abuse
Sep 23 2004 5:10PM
0 0
profile picture
berryhill
Posts: 442 - Karma: 21
i getting them for half price at my local ski shop, how stoked am i


www.steptproductions.com
Sep 23 2004 5:13PM
0 0
profile picture
soup
Posts: 6345 - Karma: 4,442
its so fucking inovative. and the thing where u can put them on other skis. so sick. sucha greeat product cet im not paying for it.
___________________

ARMADAS ARE THE BEST SKI!!!BUY THEM

ARMADA WEBSITE

And no, I'm not getting photo incentives from those ads. If i wanted to do that, I'd just say 'Rip Curl, Nordica, Marker, Level, Astrix.' See? Now i've made money.' - Brad Holmes to some idiot kid from Potland Maine
Sep 23 2004 5:39PM
0 0
profile picture
schmies
Posts: 2032 - Karma: 511
Yeah, it is true, the Pivogy weighs the same as a Look Pivot....two pairs of them.
Sep 23 2004 6:18PM
0 0
profile picture
LPT_311
Posts: 2239 - Karma: 12
everyone bitches about weight. Its not going to be that horrible
For me theres skiing, nothing more, nothing less. And it consumes me, every day im out there, and every day im not
Sep 24 2004 9:01AM
0 0
profile picture
poorboy
Posts: 917 - Karma: 10
if you get them for a non line ski do you just drill the 4 holes or do you have to get an adapter type thing?
Dont go to England...E V E R
Sep 24 2004 9:03AM
0 0
profile picture
manus
Posts: 1427 - Karma: 10
yeah they require an adapter to mount to non-Line skis


life is too short to have any regrets
Sep 24 2004 9:04AM
0 0
profile picture
NWBakerBoy
Posts: 681 - Karma: 13
i heard they were horrible last year.
but i also hear they made them better.
but i aint gunna pay 300 bones untill i try them.

and looks are really heavy.
--------------------

Rock out with your cock out
Sep 24 2004 9:31AM
0 0
profile picture
selfportrait
Posts: 1632 - Karma: 16
I really like the interchangeability. They've had yet another good idea thanks to snowboarding.

.CCR.
impact
Sep 24 2004 9:57AM
0 0
profile picture
schmies
Posts: 2032 - Karma: 511
Yeah skiing consumes me too, but it doesn't mean I want to trust my knees to a product not fully legitimized (in my eyes) with customer satisfaction...as of yet. I would rather see how the product performs first then make a decision. Bindings are a sensitive issue...no pun intended for the dude who lost his skis on a jump.
Sep 24 2004 10:19AM
0 0
profile picture
BrodyLeven
Posts: 7016 - Karma: 187
I broke mine the first day I rode them.
Yes, the ORIGINALS.

The new ones should be hitting your shops now, and will not break in the first day.
the knew one's kill. lighter, better, more heavy duty.

you know the concept behind them is dope. now the design is too.


Brody
i wont drop out of high school for skiing, mom
Sep 24 2004 1:56PM
0 0
profile picture
mystic
Posts: 497 - Karma: 10
great idea. hopefully it can be solid.
Sep 24 2004 2:19PM
0 0
profile picture
SteveXs2
Posts: 7922 - Karma: 40
I want these bad but then I'd need to get trekkers :(


-------------------

gethyped.net
azadadventures
shamesmountain
Sep 24 2004 2:25PM
0 0
profile picture
Mike.Records
Posts: 1311 - Karma: 756
its sweet how the toe pivots to help prevent knee injuries
I Love Skier Chicks
Sep 24 2004 2:34PM
0 0
profile picture
JackieChan
Posts: 417 - Karma: 10
I put my faith in them, so I'll guinea pig them and let you know. They are gonna be strapped to my Motherships this season.
Sep 28 2004 1:48PM
0 0
profile picture
h3ofilms
Posts: 4214 - Karma: 12
becker and coker have been riding them with no issues as far as i know, and ill be waiting on my pair..they arent the weight of bricks, and their damn durable...and Josh would know, hes probably slinging them in his shop already
Hibachi King Drops 8/31/04
Sep 28 2004 2:16PM
0 0
profile picture
JBeas
Posts: 1296 - Karma: 237
I had them like 2 years ago and they sucked but im sure they made improvements
ENOM headwear
Sep 28 2004 2:48PM
0 0
profile picture
Phrosty
Posts: 9956 - Karma: 18
if you've held a ski with the binding on it then there is no way you can say it's heavy. As for the plate ting,... It's kinda lame, I don't know why line didn't just make it so you could drill them into other skis, they can't expect only people that have lines to use the biding.


I think Anthony Boronowski in general is just a phase.
Sep 28 2004 3:05PM
0 0
profile picture
manus
Posts: 1427 - Karma: 10
they don't but the point was to be able to make one binging interchangable. By putting the adapter on a ski you can swop the bindings between skis with the plate mounted and other lines (since htye are pre-drilled). An adapter plate for all your skis is cheaper than bingings for all your skis, so there really is a point.


life is too short to have any regrets
Sep 28 2004 3:13PM
0 0
profile picture
Skierguy48
Posts: 527 - Karma: 10
I would have bought them had they not been $399 american, I also heard that the suspension dealy kind of deadens your ski. Not as much feel as you'd like, but still a sweet binding.
===========================
why would i bother doing a misty 9? id much rather sit here at home, get my dick sucked by your fat ass bitch of a mom, smoke some pot and eat tons of food-- Lateralis

Sep 28 2004 4:03PM
0 0
profile picture
Justo8484
Posts: 3905 - Karma: 205
you cant mount them straight into a ski because there would be too much stress on too small an area of the ski. unless the ski had metal in it, which nearly all twin tips do not, you would most likely rip the binding right out of the ski.
Sep 28 2004 5:26PM
0 0
profile picture
telestar6
Posts: 2102 - Karma: 44
Yeah yo uhave a good point. However telebindings only have four holes and they don't even realease so ther can be a lo of strees on the ski. And I have yet to pull a pair of bindings out of good skis. Wimpy skis made more for touring on the other hand I've destroyed.

I think rails in general are just a phase. - Anthony Boronowski

D-loc's picture looks like a monkey smoking that cig. If you had a mug like that would you really want everyone to see it.
Sep 28 2004 8:57PM
0 0
profile picture
wolfmansbro
Posts: 2155 - Karma: 137
for those of you that stress about the price why dont you shut up and accually take the time to analize this. lets say you buy a pair of pivot 12's for $300, yes that is a little expensive but thats only $50 more then the p12. Now look at it this way, most of us have over 2 pair of skis, thats 200+ per pair of skis for bindings, but with the pivots you only need one pair of bindings. SEE the cost benifit here?
not to mention line adds a 2 year warrenty to the skis and bindings if you buy them as a pair, now thats something to look into.
Sep 28 2004 10:30PM
0 0
All times are Eastern (-5)