It looks like you are using an ad blocker. That's okay. Who doesn't? But without advertising revenue, we can't keep making this site awesome. Click the link below for instructions on disabling adblock.
Welcome to the Newschoolers forums! You may read the forums as a guest, however you must be a registered member to post.
Register to become a member today!
pro's of a glidecam:
smooth and professional looking shots
con's:
Takes practice
expensive when compared to a fig rig
pro's of a fig rig:
easy to use - doesn't take any talent to use/hold
easy to make youself or cheap to purchase one
con's
dem shakey shots
I personally love my glidecam; but for some it's not the most rational option. If you wanna take the time to learn how to use a steadicam then invest in one; it will be well worth it
Do you know that you can get a demo version from glidecam much cheaper than other places? I got the glidecam hd2000 for 350$ http://glidecam.com/pricing.php send an email to them and hear if they have anything available ;)
just got my glidecam yesterday, got it very very close to perfect balance and ran around my apartment with it. already love it. a few more tweaks and it will be good to go for some bigger projects.
its the hd 2000. balancing it on the vertical axis isn't that bad. same with the left and right balance. i got that pretty easily after some quick camera placement changes and a few tweaks of the fine tune knobs. the drop time one was tricky at first. i had to take off a counter weight and extend it a little. now its just a matter of fine tuning some more. i would say it took around 45 min to an hour from unboxing it to balancing it roughly
The only thing a cage does is give you something to hold onto. It doesn't stabilize the footage. At most, it makes it easier to hold steady because it's generally easier to hold, but whether you can get the same effect by holding your breath or putting your elbow in your stomach.
thats what i figured. i played around with some more fine tuning and got it dialed in pretty good to shoot a couple of shots with it. now just need some practice to make it look perfect. but its so awesome, good investment
Do not get a t3, they are very limited in terms of video. If you're are looking for a budget glidecam, take a look at the flycam nano. In terms of performance, there is very little difference between the flycam and the lower-end glide cam models.
you are fine with a flycam as long as you are only using 1 lens. It will be very complicated to try and use different lenses/focal lengths etc. and I would say it is fine to go with the flycam, because once you get it set up you are good to go. Also, I would suggest getting a quick release plate, calumet.com has one that is compatible with the manfrotto plates (for the 501/701hdv, i forget the code) for about half the price of manfrotto ones, and they are still good quality
I have a glidecam. Its the weights at the bottom that smooth out the shot. It keeps everything balanced. Also the handle moves with the shot. It moves around so when you are skiing fast and its easier to be shaky that handle stays steady because if you shake, the shake goes with the shot which makes it look like nothing happened. Its kind of hard to explain. But get a GLIDECAM!
Glidecam is the name of the company that makes the best ones for under $2k. The Flycam and other analogues are mediocre at best and once the honeymoon stage is over you'll be facepalming yourself for wasting your money on it when you could've waited a little bit longer and bought something much better, as is true with any piece of camera gear.
Glidecam's have a weight range, which is specified on the page. If the weight of your rig falls within that range, you're golden. Simple.