Biased Article...

who doesnt hate him



-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Some people talk it, some people live it, some people walk it-some people give it... deal with it.

D-Loc AKA Shaky Bones... Original, Unique, and One of a Kind.

land of the free???@#! haha right... free to the power of the people in uniform

skiin', smokin', snackin', sexin', sleepin'... all anyone needs in life

Come on guys Bush wants to lose the election so it's the democrates that drop the nukes... get with the program...

haha just look at the advertisments on the side





---------------------
Good Fun With A Hand Gun.

alpentalik: i had lots of dust bunnies...they were nice and soft, but then i realized that they had pubes in them.

This coming from a person who references The Guardian and The Sunday Herald...ya they aren't biased (rolls eyes).
________________________

Getting it Right In America
Right In America

'Except For Ending Slavery, Facism, Nazism, and Communism War Has Never Solved Anything'
Protest Warrior

Sick of Michael Moore's lies?
MooreWatch

Bush/Cheney '04

referenced yes. said they weren't biased. NO. are you blind enough to not see that they are articles with fact in them? all of them? it's not an opinion, it's a fact. you're fucking retarded.
-Pat Melvin
WBP|films


'Who's not 18 yet? What? LA LA LA LA LA LA! I can't hear you.' - Jay

Yes they have facts in them but we all know the 'facts' can be spun. Just look at Michael Moore's works. And I love your 'retarded' comment. It really hits home coming from a person who hasn't made a justifiable argument yet, as far as I have seen.
________________________

Getting it Right In America
Right In America

'Except For Ending Slavery, Facism, Nazism, and Communism War Has Never Solved Anything'
Protest Warrior

Sick of Michael Moore's lies?
MooreWatch

Bush/Cheney '04

Hold up. This is not the 'world' that we are talking about. This is the UN. It is no surprise that much of the UN has strong discourse for Bush.

They are upset with Bush, this is true. But this is because Bush did not play their game and took action to secure and protect our freedoms. Argue symmantics on this topic all you want, but it was a unanimous feeling that action must be taken in order to protect our own securities and interests, with the UN or without it.

But let's not forget who we are talking about in the first place. The UN - a pompous figurehead commitee.

The web is unravelling and as it unravels it is exposing the countless scandals (food for oil, etc) the UN has been involved in, some in direct corralation with the terrorists organizations that members of the council would not stand behind us in removing. Of course many council members aren't going to stand behind us in dissembling these groups, for they are the very hand that feeds them. Confict of personal interest.

These investigations underway right now against the UN are extremely serious. If it turns out that they are indeed true, then none of us should care about a damn thing they have to say.

Time will tell.

Eat. Sleep. Breathe. Ski.

^your kidding right? the war in iraq had absolutely nothing to do with protecting our freedoms



Jesus saves!

Gretzky gets the rebound. he feeds the puck to LeClair. he shoots! he scores! the crowd goes wild

yah... vote kerry

Ski890, check this out. I even wrote something in that paragraph just for you.

Argue symmantics on this topic all you want, but it was a unanimous feeling that action must be taken in order to protect our own securities and interests, with the UN or without it.

It's completely irrelevant with the whole core of what I'm talking about. My point is simple, and if you are so blinded to see it then I am sorry for you.

Here it is again:
There is corruption in the UN. They are under investigation right now and it is extremely serious. If these scandals are in fact true (which it looks very much like at the time being, and if it is untrue than time will tell) then it will show DIRECT links tying the UN with these groups.. which would give substantial reason why they were opposed in the first place.

Eat. Sleep. Breathe. Ski.

Also, since you can say with conviction and certainty that the war in Iraq had absolutely nothing to do with protecting our own freedoms and securities, could you please enlighten me?

I seriously will listen and consider, as long as you have good evidence supporting it. Don't just tell me Bush went over to Iraq for oil if you have absolutely nothing to back up the claim.

Eat. Sleep. Breathe. Ski.

how about no one ever bitches about bias ever again on this site, because guess what, everything has bias.

____________________

Chappelle's Show Cult...BITCHES

GhostDragon I said that it had nothing to do with our freedom because saddam wasnt doing anything to our people and he had no wmds. well he did back when bush sr. gave them to him. but he didnt when we went in. the war is now about liberating the iraqi peopl. The Iraqi people are not american people. So there you have it. my argument as to why it had nothing to do with our freedoms



Jesus saves!

Gretzky gets the rebound. he feeds the puck to LeClair. he shoots! he scores! the crowd goes wild

Graves refuses to see anything he doesn't agree with. then he just makes stuff and twists people's words so he's right. sounds a lot like our current president.





---------------------
Good Fun With A Hand Gun.

alpentalik: i had lots of dust bunnies...they were nice and soft, but then i realized that they had pubes in them.

no justifiable arguments... hahaha... I'm amazed sometimes. I suck at life too I guess.
-Pat Melvin
WBP|films


'Who's not 18 yet? What? LA LA LA LA LA LA! I can't hear you.' - Jay