Member of the Month

Biffbarf
February, 2025

Online

Welcome to the Newschoolers forums! You may read the forums as a guest, however you must be a registered member to post. Register to become a member today!

The Elusive ONE SKI QUIVER- Questions.

profile picture
Farquaharson
Posts: 1203 - Karma: 246
Hey guys (and ski bunnies),

I'm currently set up reeeaaal nice with a pair of moment jib rockers and k2 hellbents. Not complaining. Unfortunately (fortunately?), I really really want to start skinning and getting into the backcountry next year and my hellbents don't have AT bindings. So here's my thought- sell current skis, buy new skis and throw on some AT bindings with all the profit I acquire from my current skis.

So the basic question of the thread is- what is a good one ski quiver ski that shreds everywhere, has no problem in the park, but is a little more weighted towards powder?

My current thought is snagging the Pettitors next year and throwing some Dukes on them...THOUGHTS?
13 years ago
0 0
profile picture
PJS.
Posts: 11943 - Karma: 895
You wanna ski park with AT bindings?
13 years ago
0 0
profile picture
RudyGarmisch
Posts: 25443 - Karma: 13,845
Jeffrey.
13 years ago
0 0
profile picture
Kreech
Posts: 4178 - Karma: 3,024
Take what kellen or rowen said, but take out the dukes and add on either the new guardian 16 or a fks-equipped alltime plate from mfd and you're good to go.
13 years ago
0 0
profile picture
Kreech
Posts: 4178 - Karma: 3,024
Yeah I'm thinking of either picking up a pair of 191 caylors or Billy goats next season or the one after, and I'm definitely looking into the guardian and the alltime, especially the guardian though. Both sound sweet.
13 years ago
0 0
profile picture
Farquaharson
Posts: 1203 - Karma: 246
what kind of price difference would there be between going for a straight AT binding like the Guardian and opting for the Alltime Plate?
13 years ago
0 0
profile picture
Farquaharson
Posts: 1203 - Karma: 246
Also, I just took a look at the Jeffrey's on the ON3P site....LOOKS PRETTY MUCH PERFECT. Can anyone vouch for how solid of a ski it is? How stiff? Comparable to something like the Line Blend?
13 years ago
0 0
profile picture
Caveman.
Posts: 9067 - Karma: 330
I ski Jeffreys as my daily go to ski. They are solid all over the mountain, pow, ice, moguls, park jumps all in one run no problem. I have not skied the Blend but they are stiffer than a Bacon and have a rounder flex. The bamboo/carbon fiber combo makes for a very fun, lively ski too.
13 years ago
0 0
profile picture
Farquaharson
Posts: 1203 - Karma: 246
When you talk about the bamboo/carbon fiber combo, you're referring to the Jeffrey, correct?
13 years ago
0 0
profile picture
.ZT.
Posts: 5679 - Karma: 2,792
check and salomon 2012 skis
13 years ago
0 0
profile picture
DUKES
Posts: 5150 - Karma: 691
Caylor with MFD alltimes
13 years ago
0 0
profile picture
Kreech
Posts: 4178 - Karma: 3,024
The guardians I think are going to be somewhere between $300 and $400. The alltimes come in at $300 but then you have to throw bindings on them. It all depends on what you want. Save a little weight and have them still ski terrific? Go guardian. Want to basically tour on fks, but have a slightly heavier setup? Mfd. There'll be a SLIGHT difference in performance, going up weighted towards guardians, going down weighted towards alltimes. If you're going completely balls out off of huge ass cliffs on the regular, dish out the extra coin for the fks-alltime combo. If not, save the money and get guardians; they'll still ski plenty burly.
13 years ago
0 0
profile picture
belden...
Posts: 2914 - Karma: 1,274
Go with mfd's dukes are heavy as shit
13 years ago
0 0
profile picture
belden...
Posts: 2914 - Karma: 1,274
Or you could keep your skis and get the quiver killer inserts
13 years ago
0 0
profile picture
SteezoSaurus
Posts: 2630 - Karma: 2,670
Yea true, but the MFD can be managable with the right binding. The Duke is good for slackcountry, but the Alltime is a bit more trustable when your deep in the bc
13 years ago
0 0
profile picture
RudyGarmisch
Posts: 25443 - Karma: 13,845
I kind of am the opinion that your setup weight is irrelevant. If its heavy, hike more and get your legs stronger. It would matter if I did huge multiday tours, but if I was doing that I'd be on a superlight Dynafit setup instead. This is slackcountry and three hour tours we're mostly talking about, I'd rather have a solid binding on the way down than two less pounds going up.
13 years ago
0 0
profile picture
Farquaharson
Posts: 1203 - Karma: 246
Ginko is right for sure, I'm only really going to be dealing with slackcountry skiing, no real week long expeditions. Guardians sound fine. And just because my local shop only sells marker bindings... would you guys make a strong argument against getting Dukes instead of Guardians?
13 years ago
0 0
profile picture
Twig
Posts: 6446 - Karma: 61,291
If you really have to do it all on one ski, inserts and two sets of bindings seem the only realistic option to me. No touring setup is going to hold up to the abuse of park riding for that long. And who wants to tour or even be in the BC in mixed conditions on skis with park edges?
For me a one ski quiver is just about workable if you don't want to tour. I'm happy with my SFBs in all situations thus far but throwing touring in to the equation makes it impossible.
13 years ago
0 0
profile picture
84west
Posts: 646 - Karma: 1,254
You will probably be able to pick up a pair of dukes on discount at the end of the year, and supporting your local shop is also good
13 years ago
0 0
profile picture
arammell
Posts: 117 - Karma: 30
If you want to be serious about AT then you could look at the Dynaduke or Dynalook and give yourself the best of both worlds.  Obviously not the cheapest of options, but it would let you ski a Dynafit Radical on BC days and FKS or Look on resort days. 

http://bindingfreedom.com/DynaDuke-Swap-Plates-1001.htm
13 years ago
0 0
profile picture
Kreech
Posts: 4178 - Karma: 3,024
For dukes vs guardians, the way I see it is that the guardians are basically just a way better, more updated version of the duke. They're lower to your skis, they've got less slop, you don't have to step out to change into AT mode, there are more metal components, and you don't have to worry quite as much about ice build up. If they cost a similar amount, why WOULDN'T you get the guardian? Just order online and have your shop mount them up.
13 years ago
0 0
profile picture
Farquaharson
Posts: 1203 - Karma: 246
So the Guardian really is a superior binding to the Duke then...shit. I just hate not supporting my local shop at all. If I went and got some Jeffreys and then bought some Guardians on the side....ugh. Doesn't really reflect well when I bring those into my shop to get mounted up. I dunno, obviously this shouldn't be that big of a deal, after all it is MY SKI that we're talking about. But the guy gives me deals on everything and free demos and tune ups and mounts and treats me like gold all the time... #whitepeopleproblems
13 years ago
0 0
profile picture
JacheOReally
Posts: 3597 - Karma: 253
Line (motherfucking) Influence (motherfucking) 105


Greatest 1 ski quiver ski ever made....
13 years ago
0 0
profile picture
Farquaharson
Posts: 1203 - Karma: 246
Yeah but.....I mean......look at your icon.....








Does your opinion matter?
































Click for larger image
13 years ago
0 0
profile picture
wrichmond
Posts: 562 - Karma: 369
Fat-ypus I-Rock

I ride them mounted with Dukes and ride the ski everywhere, including the park.
Far stiffer than Hellbent, but still a medium flex, so it can does Rock all conditions.

Full Review


13 years ago
0 0
All times are Eastern (-4); Currently it's 9:32AM