Welcome to the Newschoolers forums! You may read the forums as a guest, however you must be a registered member to post. Register to become a member today!
Profahoben_212So, you are saying the Nordica Doberman 130 has a different flex than my GPX 130? yeah no. The gpx has a different liner and rubber boot boards. Pretty much the only difference. Miiight havea slightly wider ankle area.
Saying that all race boots flex like a 2x4? Now you cant be serious dude. They make all sorts of flexes of race boots. Even 80 flex like your precious SPK!!!!
Im sorry that you cant flex a 130 boot man, but you should try to do some research. You need it.
East_CoasterI'm saying these boots feel different entirely. The flex is the same, but the boots still feel different. Racing boots are always stiffer it's just how they're made. They're also heavier.
East_CoasterI never said you couldn't buy an 80 flex race boot, I simply said they have a totally different feel than a freeride boot. They're heavier than free rides and they're like this for a reason. They're meant for gripping hardpack and ice better than a freeride. This is the same with a racing boot and freestyle boot. I know some of the full tilts are based off race boots but this does not mean they are exactly alike. Freestyle boots are meant to absorb shock from rails, jumps, etc. Racing boots are meant to grip the hardpack and ice. Now this doesn't mean race boots don't absurd impact because good race race boots are but compared to a freestyle boot, the freestyle boot absorbs more.
Profahoben_212They are the exact same. Racing boots are not always stiffer. They are the same.
So the entirety of your different feel comes down to weight? Yeah that 15 grams makes a huge difference man. They are the exact same boot ya fuckin kook.
And most of those "shock absorbers" are marketing. They don't do anything. The only thing that makes a huge difference us a properly fit footbed.
I am now 110% sure we are being trolled
East_CoasterI know what you mean and i know you pick boot flex on your ability but I don't see weight as being the biggest issue. A flex of say 120 puts your weight over your skis more than an 80. Now hopefully you all know why this can be a good and bad thing. The good thing is your more forward and able to control skis in hardpack and icy conditions. This boot just doesn't perform the same way in powder. You can't get as far back on your tails as you would with a softer flex. It's just simple physics. I agree that a 120 flex is better though in most cases because like everyone's pointed out is the shin bang. But there's a median to the flex and a little bit around. For instance, some people may go with a 110 or a 130 opposed to a 130 due to their ability. Ski flexes aren't set in stone.
East_CoasterShins are in the tongue but race boots are more stiff dude. You can't be serious? There is a difference between race boots and freeride boots. Have you tried a pair of race boots then freeride? For one, there's weight and then there's stiffness. So boots are based of other boots. That doesn't mean they're an exact replica of that boot.
East_CoasterI never said you couldn't buy an 80 flex race boot, I simply said they have a totally different feel than a freeride boot. They're heavier than free rides and they're like this for a reason. They're meant for gripping hardpack and ice better than a freeride. This is the same with a racing boot and freestyle boot. I know some of the full tilts are based off race boots but this does not mean they are exactly alike. Freestyle boots are meant to absorb shock from rails, jumps, etc. Racing boots are meant to grip the hardpack and ice. Now this doesn't mean race boots don't absurd impact because good race race boots are but compared to a freestyle boot, the freestyle boot absorbs more.