It looks like you are using an ad blocker. That's okay. Who doesn't? But without advertising revenue, we can't keep making this site awesome. Click the link below for instructions on disabling adblock.
Welcome to the Newschoolers forums! You may read the forums as a guest, however you must be a registered member to post.
Register to become a member today!
it can be a reliable background source. i dont take any information straight from there, but i use it as a reference point to take a general topic into more specifics. it is actually incredibly helpful for writing papers
all the teachers say that and think they're badass cause they know about the internet but there's a ton of people whose job it is to look for stuff and fix it. plus, anybody who wants to go edit it for the lulz doesn't go in and be like "hehehe, i'm gonna change the last digit in plancks constant to a 2" they're more like, "hehehe, i' gonna change the capital of the U.S. to Fart DC". And you should probably be able to see thats wrong.
Silly marsh, you don't cite Wikipedia. You take the information that you used in your paper, find the citation for it at the bottom of the Wiki page, go to that site/article/whatever, and cite that!
exactly bro....the citations at the bottom of wikipedia are amazing for papers. So much sources which lead to countless of amazing other sources. Though the best is definatly those school research databases
Plus, the changes you make if you are not a credible user must first be accepted by a mod. Seriously people, wikipedia is extremely reliable source and still has a bad rep because the rules for posting changes and the monitoring of changes was a lot more lax. Plus, when a change is made, it shows up on the page... Im so sick of people saying that wikipedia is not a valid source for information and bringing up irrelevant points that havent been a factor for five or so years. /rant