![](/images/flash_video_placeholder.png)
Welcome to the Newschoolers forums! You may read the forums as a guest, however you must be a registered member to post. Register to become a member today!
I agree that rich people have responsibilities, if not an obligation to share their wealth.
The "new idea" you seem to pose sets yourself up perfectly to be owned. I believe you are suggesting philanthropy, which many rich financiers do engage in, and many schools who have strong finance/economics programs encourage their students to be philanthropists if they are successful.
BUT...How about instead of Mr. 70M paying high taxes, he pumps money back into the economy by buying yachts, lambos, and mansions!?
My point is that too many people do not realize the amount of effort and time required to become successful in finance, and that these "rich, greedy, viillains" donate millions and millions of dollars each year. OWS has good intentions, but so many Occupiers do not know what they are talking about. That Schiff video was spot on to how I feel.
I gues you are the retard.
OWS does not equal Occupy Washington DC. Although similar in intent, that article and Occupying Washington DC are basically argued for by Schiff in the video. "You need to occupy the legislators who make the rules, not the people that exploit them. Otherwise there will ne no change."
I'm not sure if you are agreeing with me or not.
It can def. be argued that government is run by banks and corporate America, but the Federal government sets the regulations and the Fed controls the monetary policy. Smart corporations will exploit the system, and although immoral, most of it is legal.
If you are suggesting that he should not invest his money back into America, than LOL!!!!
Schiff is the CEO of Euro Pacific Capital. His business is largely NOT investing in America; he does a lot of investing in foreign assests. Should "Mr. 70M" stop working and fire his employees so he isn't as rich?
That is why I said "LOL," because Schiff's investment firm does a lot of investing NOT in America and clearly wants lower taxes.
Why would he give money to The Fed? The Fed is not the same as the Federal government. Are you implying his taxes should be lower by saring "by not giving it the Fed." I think he would agree.
The Federal government is the Federal government; executive, legislative, and judicial branch, etc.
The Fed is the The Federal Reserve System. It is responsible for managing the monetary policy, regulating banks, etc. It's also privately owned, not owned by the Federal government.