Member of the Month

hi_vis360
November, 2024

Online

Welcome to the Newschoolers forums! You may read the forums as a guest, however you must be a registered member to post. Register to become a member today!

Heisman Trophy

profile picture
hey-dude-its-me
Posts: 4238 - Karma: 412
I think RG3 is gonna take and deservedly so




---turn off audio----







Dec 6 2011 9:29PM
0 0
profile picture
itsguccibaby
Posts: 41 - Karma: 10

OSU, KSU, Baylor, OU.The top 3 teams in the Pac 12 are good but overall the Big 12 is a tougher conference. I dont care if Luck is a better QB than RG3; RG3 will win the Heisman because of his superior passing stats, superiors rushing stats, and a worse team than Luck's.

Dec 8 2011 4:41AM
0 0
profile picture
hey-dude-its-me
Posts: 4238 - Karma: 412
haha give a random guess about something unprovable, act like its fact, move on.

There is no 'solid' argument why Luck should win it when theres several for why RG3. All I'm hearing is basically an argument that Luck has a higher potential than RG3. Sweet, but he didn't display it this year
Dec 8 2011 10:06AM
0 0
profile picture
hey-dude-its-me
Posts: 4238 - Karma: 412
Do you no realize that google exists and people aren't just going to believe shit because you say it?

Strength of Schedule:
Baylor: 13
Stanford: 18

Conference Power Rankings
Big 12: 1st, 41.7
Pac 12: 3rd, 34.8

Your crush on Luck is fucking up any hopes of a reasonable discussion here.

Luck loses in every single measurable category there is.
Dec 8 2011 10:11AM
0 0
profile picture
Dmarc
Posts: 1035 - Karma: 83
This year is different then previous years it seems alot closer and that its not gonna be a blow out like some previous years
Dec 8 2011 10:36AM
0 0
profile picture
californiagrown
Posts: 9794 - Karma: 2,014
except that Luck just won the Maxwell award which is the best player in college football as voted on by the coaches themselves. I would think they might know a thing or two. OHHHH BUUURRNNN!!!!!


Can i get a high five? anyone? anyone?
Dec 8 2011 10:14PM
0 0
profile picture
hey-dude-its-me
Posts: 4238 - Karma: 412
high five for your biggest fail yet?

They're talking about taking away the coach's vote from the BCS because they're unqualified and don't pay attention to anything outside their own program, pretty laughable how much stock you apparently put into them.
Dec 8 2011 10:17PM
0 0
profile picture
Pinguu
Posts: 1581 - Karma: 49
I hate Wisco, but damn Monte Ball is a beast! I'm a fan of him and hope he somehow wins it...
Dec 8 2011 10:19PM
0 0
profile picture
Squaw6
Posts: 469 - Karma: 50
Griffon carried his team in the big games. Luck disappeared against Oregon, and Stanford was truly at their best when the running game and defense was carrying the team. He's a great QB but his performances weren't really heisman deserving. If you take out the USC game he's really only got a bunch of solid games against terrible competition. Maxwell doesn't mean shit, it often goes to players who don't win the heisman.
Dec 8 2011 10:19PM
0 0
profile picture
hey-dude-its-me
Posts: 4238 - Karma: 412
bump
Dec 10 2011 5:21PM
0 0
profile picture
hey-dude-its-me
Posts: 4238 - Karma: 412
sick
Dec 10 2011 8:58PM
0 0
profile picture
Crowley.
Posts: 190 - Karma: 19
Trent Richardson all day baby saw him play in person an he is the best RB since Adrian Peterson
Dec 10 2011 9:02PM
0 0
profile picture
jblaski
Posts: 5566 - Karma: 1,078
For the record, Montee Ball not winning is complete bullshit.
Dec 10 2011 9:43PM
0 0
profile picture
collinder
Posts: 738 - Karma: 34
I think Tebow is gonna win it
Dec 10 2011 9:45PM
0 0
profile picture
PhaedeD
Posts: 11499 - Karma: 342
RG3 boss.
Dec 10 2011 9:47PM
0 0
profile picture
californiagrown
Posts: 9794 - Karma: 2,014
he is the 3rd best running back in the nation.
Dec 10 2011 9:50PM
0 0
profile picture
49566738265
Posts: 0 - Karma: 7,704
It's not just about stats, otherwise Kellen Moore would have been a contender for this thing too. It's about the most outstanding player in college football, all things considered. Baylor would be nothing without RG, but he led them to a good season in a very good conference. That's why I think he got it. Take away Luck and Standford really hurts, take away Ball and Wisconsin will survive, if Mathieu is gone LSU will probably lose one game this year, but take away LaMichael James and....no one noticed. Barner did just as well.
Dec 10 2011 10:49PM
0 0
profile picture
californiagrown
Posts: 9794 - Karma: 2,014
What sealed the race was that RG3 had a couple signature heisman moments. That is a must. that is the only reason honey badger was there, because thats all he did was produce heisman moments. Luck should have, and would have won if he had a legit heisman moment, but instead he chose to stay within the offense because that gave him a better chance to win. That, and stanford had a god-awful recieving corps.


RG3 deserves it this year for sure, but he IS NOT the best player in college.
Dec 10 2011 11:10PM
0 0
profile picture
itsguccibaby
Posts: 41 - Karma: 10
God you're so so stupid.
Dec 10 2011 11:16PM
0 0
profile picture
californiagrown
Posts: 9794 - Karma: 2,014
elaborate please...
Dec 10 2011 11:22PM
0 0
profile picture
Guck
Posts: 528 - Karma: 221
RG3 are my initials.
Dec 10 2011 11:23PM
0 0
profile picture
hey-dude-its-me
Posts: 4238 - Karma: 412
He doesn't really have to, you haven't made a single post based on facts. just a bunch of 'I thinks' and 'shoulds' and now some whining thrown in, idk why you continue to think that people are going to treat your opinion as fact.

I think I saw in another thread where you hinted that none of us know about football since we never played it a high level. I started cracking up when I realized that 'high level' was a highschool. You need a reality check badly.
Dec 11 2011 10:07AM
0 0
All times are Eastern (-5)