Welcome to the Newschoolers forums! You may read the forums as a guest, however you must be a registered member to post. Register to become a member today!
This.
Obviously it is your vacation, but I too see it as a bit of a waste to ski Northstar/Boreal.
I willl never forget my first trip to Squaw. It was my senior year in high school, during March. The mountain just blew me away. I lived in the east, and I had skied out west at Vail, Park City, and Sun Valley. Nothing I had ever seen prepared me for Squaw, It had so much steep terrain that it made my eastern mountains seem like bunny hills. None of the other western places I had been were anything like Squaw either. I hiked the Palisades, and skied National, which made the eastern stuff I was used to seem like nothing. It was the steepest run I had ever skied, at the time, and the only thing back east which might compare would be Tuckerman's.
My last two years of college I took winter off, and moved to Squaw. After that, I spent 4 more years there before grad school. Obviously I am biased, but it is a truly amazing mountain. I ski 40 days a year now, about 30-35 at Mammoth and 10 at Mt. Baldy, and I really miss Squaw, to the point where sometimes I want to move to San Fran. Don't get me wrong, I love Mammoth, and I'm lucky to ski there as much as I do, but Squaw has it beat when it comes to steep terrain.
As mentioned above, Alpine is sick too. Alpine is, in my mind, one of the most underrated mountains in the country, some of the best steeps anywhere. Sugar Bowl is also a great little mountain, with some very steep terrain.
There is a good reason your buddies have a hard-on for Squaw. If you don't do Squaw, then I would ski Alpine, with maybe a trip to Sugar Bowl. Seriously, with those mountains around it is a waste to ski Boreal/Northstar. Not meaning to offend anyone, just my two cents.