Restless — An Alex Hall Portrait (Full Film) | Faction Skis

Member of the Month

KilaTsunami
October, 2024

Online

Welcome to the Newschoolers forums! You may read the forums as a guest, however you must be a registered member to post. Register to become a member today!

Just Thought I'd Share This

profile picture
danderson.
Posts: 6560 - Karma: 5,252
Click for larger image

Mind blown.
Nov 15 2011 9:50PM
0 0
profile picture
-emile-
Posts: 6613 - Karma: 8,592
well its from a beadle the bard book
its an allusion to the deathly hallows

voldemort died for power. =elder wand
snape died for harry's mother , his lost love = the resurection stone
and harry greeted death like an old friend = invisibility cloak.

thats just how I interpreted it , so it might not be true
Nov 17 2011 3:56PM
0 0
profile picture
danderson.
Posts: 6560 - Karma: 5,252
Don't act like you don't know me, you cunt.
Nov 17 2011 5:56PM
0 0
profile picture
B-runge
Posts: 16558 - Karma: 361
O:riginal
P:ost

i meant that picture, unless jk rowling actually did say that then the movies are just stupid

Nov 18 2011 7:12PM
0 0
profile picture
WestWoods
Posts: 960 - Karma: 414
I almost felt like sig'ing this!
Nov 18 2011 7:18PM
0 0
profile picture
DGski
Posts: 3491 - Karma: 2,328
movie =/= book

in the book they were the same thing

my friend told me this today and i died
Nov 18 2011 7:25PM
0 0
profile picture
B-runge
Posts: 16558 - Karma: 361
this is totally acceptable then

Nov 18 2011 7:33PM
0 0
profile picture
RubberSoul
Posts: 11249 - Karma: 14,642
INTERESTING
Nov 18 2011 7:39PM
0 0
profile picture
corona
Posts: 12795 - Karma: 32,751
they definitely aren't the same in the book.  first off the main main difference that puts a stop to the whole theory is that the snake in the first book is a male. go read that chapter again. Nagini is absolutely a female. They can't be both.  The second is in the book the snake says that he was born and raised in captivity and he's never known freedom.

also another irrefutable point that makes them not the same snake: Nagini is a venomous snake, the snake in the first book is clearly a boa as that's what it says. boa's are not venomous. not the same snake.

the reason why people thought this is because in the movie they use a burmese python for both snakes, making them look the same. it's probably actually the same snake used.
Nov 19 2011 1:05AM
0 0
profile picture
bangarangmules
Posts: 5065 - Karma: 84
Apparently it was ambiguous whether or not Rowling was being serious when she said this. But I still hope it was Nagini.
Nov 19 2011 1:19AM
0 0
profile picture
B-runge
Posts: 16558 - Karma: 361
it doesnt really make sense that it would be naugini

i feel like voldermort already made her a horcrux before he got owned by harry and killed his parents, and the snake was bread in captivity

overanalizing it so much
Nov 19 2011 1:31AM
0 0
profile picture
bangarangmules
Posts: 5065 - Karma: 84
I think what she meant was that they used the same snake (in real life) for the filming of the captive snake and Nagini.
Nov 19 2011 10:19AM
0 0
profile picture
Charlie_Kelly
Posts: 11954 - Karma: 12,298
This. This. This.

Plus what B-runge said. Voldemort already made the horcruxes before he was vaporized by Harry. If the snake was raised in captivity its whole life AFTER the fatal incident between Harry and Voldemort then it would most certainly NOT be Nagini.
Nov 19 2011 11:00AM
0 0
profile picture
.spaghetticat.
Posts: 4283 - Karma: 890
:O
this might have more pages then balto's mind = blown thread
Nov 19 2011 11:15AM
0 0
All times are Eastern (-5)