Member of the Month

KilaTsunami
October, 2024

Online

Welcome to the Newschoolers forums! You may read the forums as a guest, however you must be a registered member to post. Register to become a member today!

ON3P Jeronimo pow performance?

profile picture
Krokodile
Posts: 350 - Karma: 40
I am in the market for pow skis and got a good offer for some Jmos.  I have heard mixed things about these skis in the powder based off the limited reviews I've read.  Do any of you guys have experience with these in powder conditions of various depths?
Oct 2 2011 4:00PM
0 0
profile picture
stickerman
Posts: 2043 - Karma: 147
bump. would like to know also.
Oct 3 2011 3:10PM
0 0
profile picture
Balto
Posts: 25985 - Karma: 4,404
well, seeing as you live in WV, they will be fine in the amount of "pow" you get. being 96 under foot, they make an excellent do it all ski, rip the trees in the morning, then hit up the park in the afternoon.

out west, 96 is pretty narrow for a real pow ski from my experience with them.
Oct 3 2011 3:15PM
0 0
profile picture
Krokodile
Posts: 350 - Karma: 40
I'll be using them in Utah for a while this winter.  They will basically be a one-quiver ski for when I'm not in the park on my Halos and out west where I'm likely to see some nice pow.
Oct 3 2011 3:36PM
0 0
profile picture
Balto
Posts: 25985 - Karma: 4,404
1 week is fine, using them an entire season would be a different story
Oct 3 2011 3:39PM
0 0
profile picture
Brenone
Posts: 4944 - Karma: 296
Ive been thinking of picking up a pair of these also but not as a pow ski. I have a pair of pow skis for the rare east coast powder days and when I get to travel.
I need an everyday ski and these fit the length & width dimensions im looking for. The only thing holding me back from pulling the trigger on these is the rocker. It doesnt look to be that dramatic in the diagram on their website. Is it noticeable when cruising on groomers and in the park?
Oct 3 2011 3:46PM
0 0
profile picture
Balto
Posts: 25985 - Karma: 4,404
well, any rocker is noticeable, but does it hinder the performance of the ski? not in the least, truthfully the rocker really makes the ski what it is. You can blast through crud easier, be more playful in the park, and get the added float in pow, all without loss of traditional ski characteristics. Scott (iggyskier) put a lot of time into the jmo design, and it really shows when you ride them.
Oct 3 2011 3:53PM
0 0
profile picture
RudyGarmisch
Posts: 25443 - Karma: 13,844
Rocker diagrams are true to scale on our website FYI, just to give you an idea of the profile.
Oct 3 2011 4:05PM
0 0
profile picture
Brenone
Posts: 4944 - Karma: 296
Thanks & thanks^^

I think Im gonna give it a go.
Oct 3 2011 4:25PM
0 0
profile picture
Balto
Posts: 25985 - Karma: 4,404
do it man, they will not disappoint
Oct 3 2011 4:29PM
0 0
profile picture
Mr_pretzel
Posts: 4616 - Karma: 1,289
Give my review a look.
https://newschoolers.com/ns/forums/readthread/thread_id/617704/
Oct 3 2011 7:34PM
0 0
profile picture
noparking
Posts: 1123 - Karma: 50
I've had over 20+ pow days on mine and they kill it. You really can't go wrong with them.
Oct 3 2011 8:42PM
0 0
profile picture
LDAntuono
Posts: 215 - Karma: 63
if u already have a park ski get the caylor or billy goat from on3p cuz jmos are more park. id say 60% park and 40% all mountain or pow
Oct 3 2011 9:03PM
0 0
profile picture
washparkdub
Posts: 266 - Karma: 66
Lets be honest, anything over 90 is a pow ski.
Remember though, its the artist, not the brush.
Phenomenal skis though.
Oct 12 2011 8:17PM
0 0
profile picture
ClydeFrog
Posts: 164 - Karma: 56
And mine as well.
http://blistergearreview.com/gear-reviews/2nd-look-on3p-jeronimo

Mr_pretzel and I have talked a good amount about this ski, which you should read through here:

https://www.newschoolers.com/ns/forums/readthread/thread_id/612782/

IMHO this year's Jeronimo looks like an improvement over the 2010-2011 model (which was a good ski to begin with).

I'll quote Scott Andrus of ON3P
"...for 11/12 the ski has a slightly rounder flex (bit softer underfoot mostly, ends are about the same), less camber underfoot, and the new elliptical rocker profile which isn't so abrupt"

I'll have a review of the 11/12 up soon.
Oct 12 2011 8:50PM
0 0
profile picture
prophet
Posts: 4734 - Karma: 1,007
Ha, that's funny because I say anything under 100 is a park ski.
Oct 21 2011 9:47PM
0 0
All times are Eastern (-5)