so, without further ado: how can this be:
when explaining the un-airplane-like destruction pattern (no signs of wings or anything, kinda a small hole for a kinda big plane), gov'tal organisations always point out that the airplane "vaporized" and the wings were folded to the body, leaving windows and walls almost un-touched.
so, just a tad earlier, the same day, the whole world was on record to see how it really looks when a airplane hits a building
seriously, i dont say anything happened this way or another, but if i look at these two pictures, i would say that there is no way that both were caused by the "same" (similar) event. i see a plane-like hole in the WTC and a bazillion videos showing that a plane hits the building. i cannot, however, see a plane hitting the worlds safest building on video, nor can i, imo detect any evidence for the fact that a plane hit that building.
if you want to call me dumb, do it, this type of discussion is perfect for people that like this strategy. but keep in mind that i live in europe and you dont hear that much about the attacks nor does anybody really have any knowledge about it so i appreciate a little discussion about these topics.
