Member of the Month

hi_vis360
December, 2024

Online

Welcome to the Newschoolers forums! You may read the forums as a guest, however you must be a registered member to post. Register to become a member today!

Lense recomendation...

profile picture
Alf_Alfa
Posts: 2874 - Karma: 213
Camera: Sony a33

Budget: 850 bucks, the lower the better.

Main use: filming edits/every day use.

Any advice would be great!

+k for help/bumps

-k for hate
Aug 18 2011 2:09PM
0 0
profile picture
Alf_Alfa
Posts: 2874 - Karma: 213
nothing? :P

I was maybe thinking a 50mm would be pretty sick....
Aug 18 2011 6:19PM
0 0
profile picture
edd1e
Posts: 679 - Karma: 16
Hey I have an a55. For 850 bucks if you want a zoom you could get the tamron 17 50 f 2.8 and a Sony 35mm Sam f1.8 . Or you could wait, Sony is bringing out a 16-50 2.8 in 2 weeks . This will be around 800. Or u could get a Sony zeiss 16-80 for the same price . Check out dyxum.com for reviews of Sony lenses . Personally I would get the tamron 17-50 and then a fast prime or macro lens . There are alot to choose from like the 35mm f1.8 or the 50mm f1.8 or the 30mm macro .
Aug 18 2011 9:28PM
0 0
profile picture
edd1e
Posts: 679 - Karma: 16
You can get vintage fast 50mm lenses off eBay for like 50 bucks all you need is an adaptor. ( 10 bucks) . I like the asahi pentax 50mm or the Helios 58mm. Also the old minolta f1.7 works without the adaptor as does autofocus . It is a minolta af 50 1.7 . Check eBay, craigslist etc.....
Aug 18 2011 9:31PM
0 0
profile picture
Balto
Posts: 25985 - Karma: 4,404
get a bunch of old lenses and adapt them
Aug 18 2011 10:59PM
0 0
profile picture
squibble
Posts: 4569 - Karma: 104
do some research before you do that as you might end up with a bunch of good lenses with ridiculous imperfections due to the adapter
Aug 18 2011 11:46PM
0 0
profile picture
TijmenDal
Posts: 4849 - Karma: 1,295
I'd say: get nice old Minolta glass.
Pretty much all lenses can be adapted to Canon, because the mount is so big, pretty much the only one that isn't adaptable is Minolta, so make sure it fits your camera and can focus to infinity before adapting.
Aug 19 2011 5:04AM
0 0
profile picture
snorlax-one
Posts: 145 - Karma: 22


yes most lenses can be adapted to canon and the minolta is at the end
although the distance between the lens and sensore in canon is a little longer you can make the conversion by shaving off the minolta mount ( .28mm )
there is a guy over at fredmiranda ( camera forum ) that will do it for you
( http://www.jimbuchananspace.com/Camera_Services.html )

it is not the mainly the size of the mount but the distance from the sensore
see chart

Leica M (rangefinder): 27.95mm
Canon FD: 42mm
Minolta MD: 43.72mm
Canon EOS: 44mm
Sony Alpha: 44.6mm
M42 (Pentax Screwmount): 45.46mm
Pentax K: 45.46mm
Contax/Yashica (CY): 45.5mm
Olympus OM: 46mm
Nikon F : 46.5mm
Leica R (SLR): 47mm
Contax N: 48mm
Mamiya 645: 63.3mm
Aug 19 2011 1:17PM
0 0
profile picture
edd1e
Posts: 679 - Karma: 16
Errr. Minolta af lenses fit on the Sony alpha with NO adaptor . But the MC and MD lenses do not fit without an adaptor with extra glass in it . These are more expensive and mean you lose some light and sharpness. Personally I would avoid minolta MC and MD lenses as well as Canon FD lenses, for the same reason .
Aug 19 2011 9:15PM
0 0
profile picture
Alf_Alfa
Posts: 2874 - Karma: 213
Yeah, im stuck between the tamron 17 50 f 2.8 and the zeiss, but I think the tamron might be a little better for filming. what do you think?
Aug 19 2011 11:33PM
0 0
profile picture
edd1e
Posts: 679 - Karma: 16
I have heard of alot of people buying the tamron over the zeiss because of cost. I think the zeiss is twice the price and the build is so so . I would et the tamron and save some Money . Plus it has a fixed aperture unlike the zeiss .
Aug 20 2011 12:46AM
0 0
profile picture
TWoods
Posts: 10014 - Karma: 8,386
Odds are the Tamron is better glass anyways. I don't know much about the Zeiss/Sony lenses, but i'd be willing to bet it's actually just cosina BS like the "zeiss" zf lenses. Not worth it.
Aug 20 2011 2:01AM
0 0
profile picture
TBigCat
Posts: 629 - Karma: 4
fs 1000
Aug 20 2011 1:22PM
0 0
profile picture
[evan]
Posts: 5628 - Karma: 117
Click for larger image
Aug 20 2011 1:26PM
0 0
profile picture
TBigCat
Posts: 629 - Karma: 4
bump
Aug 20 2011 8:17PM
0 0
profile picture
Alf_Alfa
Posts: 2874 - Karma: 213
Thanks for the input guys, ended up putting one of these bad boys on hold at my local camera shop

http://www.sigmaphoto.com/shop/10-20mm-f4-56-ex-dc-hsm-sigma

pretty stoked on it and it was on sale.
Aug 21 2011 5:47PM
0 0
All times are Eastern (-5)