Welcome to the Newschoolers forums! You may read the forums as a guest, however you must be a registered member to post. Register to become a member today!
Hell is the worst place for skiers to live, until it freezes over
Big Bear sucks but Mt. Baldy does not. Neither does Mt. Waterman. Neither does Mammoth.
If you have the ability to get a ski lease at Mammoth, and the motivation to go a lot, Socal does not suck. It blows doors on living back east. I ski Mammoth usually 3 weekends a month, and Baldy every weekend I don't go to Mammoth. The last few years Baldy has gotten great snow. Last year I got in 43 days, with 30 of those at Mammoth. I know lots of other people in Socal who do what I do. Mammoth passes are only around 650$ if you are an MVP member.
You can get great skiing in socal, you just have to be willing to drive(and pay) for it. If you can't afford a Mammoth ski lease, that makes it a bit tougher. That being said, I know some guys from Hermosa who drive to Mammoth 3 weekends a month. They leave Saturday morning at 4 am, get a room at Motel 6 for one night, split 3 ways, and get in a lot of days that way. I'm glad I can afford a ski lease, it makes things much easier.
If you are willing to make the effort, you can have a great ski life and live in socal. Norcal is a bit easier, as Tahoe is closer, but Mammoth is one of the best mountains in the country. Socal is great, you just need to stay away from Big Bear/Mountain High/Scummit. If Baldy and Waterman have good years, you can ski quality terrain without going to Mammoth.
In Canada, I'm gonna go with north Onterrible.