Member of the Month

je_t.aime_canard
January, 2025

Online

Welcome to the Newschoolers forums! You may read the forums as a guest, however you must be a registered member to post. Register to become a member today!

Another first edit with T2i

profile picture
LT
Posts: 87 - Karma: 1,151
This is the first edit i've made with my new T2i.

Seems like everyone is posting their first edits so I figured I would too. Luckily I was able to get some skiing in for my edit instead of normal summer shit.

Any critiques or comments? Shot with Tamron 17-50mm f/2.8

www.vimeo.com/purplecityproject/vol1

<object width="398" height="224"><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><param name="movie" value="http://vimeo.com/moogaloop.swf?clip_id=26973087&server=vimeo.com&show_title=0&show_byline=0&show_portrait=0&color=00adef&fullscreen=1&autoplay=0&loop=0" /><embed src="http://vimeo.com/moogaloop.swf?clip_id=26973087&server=vimeo.com&show_title=0&show_byline=0&show_portrait=0&color=00adef&fullscreen=1&autoplay=0&loop=0" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" allowscriptaccess="always" width="398" height="224"></embed></object>

Jul 27 2011 8:46PM
0 0
profile picture
LT
Posts: 87 - Karma: 1,151
I obviously can't embed very well someone wanna help me with that?
Jul 27 2011 8:47PM
0 0
profile picture
eheath
Posts: 61780 - Karma: 124,906
Damn, that 17-50 looks good. That line looked mad fun too.

Only complaint really is that your tripod shots were mostly static (meaning not moving) get some pans and tilts in there.
Jul 27 2011 8:50PM
0 0
profile picture
.spaghetticat.
Posts: 4283 - Karma: 889

Jul 27 2011 8:52PM
0 0
profile picture
LT
Posts: 87 - Karma: 1,151
Yeah I have a shit tripod doesn't pan well....got a new one coming in soon. Also thats the Tamron with the VC and I saw in another thread you said the non VC was much better.... just wondering why?
Jul 27 2011 9:13PM
0 0
profile picture
eheath
Posts: 61780 - Karma: 124,906
The non-vc is sharper, its probably not super noticeable on video.
Jul 27 2011 9:28PM
0 0
profile picture
ChucklesNorman.
Posts: 1197 - Karma: 712
Very sick.
Jul 27 2011 10:01PM
0 0
profile picture
49566738265
Posts: 0 - Karma: 7,705
I think the non-vc is only sharper because the VC moves, and if you don't wait for it to settle then you'll have a very slight blur. So it probably looks the same on video.
Jul 27 2011 10:21PM
0 0
profile picture
family_vacation
Posts: 6200 - Karma: 7,840
It looked like the motion tracking at the start was done in your editing program. I'd recommend either keeping it static or using After Effects to track the motion so that it looks more natural.
Jul 27 2011 10:26PM
0 0
profile picture
CrotchKiller
Posts: 9037 - Karma: 6,943
well done man! really good nice edit. only suggestion would be to watch your exposure. some shots seemed a wee bit over exposed. well done though. im really looking at buying a tamron now
Jul 27 2011 11:02PM
0 0
profile picture
A_Z_DoubleEE
Posts: 87 - Karma: 10
whats the name of this song?
Jul 28 2011 3:08AM
0 0
All times are Eastern (-5)