Welcome to the Newschoolers forums! You may read the forums as a guest, however you must be a registered member to post. Register to become a member today!
A smart company will use value-based pricing (how much a consumer is willing to pay) over cost-based pricing (how much it costs a company to make a product). I'm not an expert on ski/snowboard manufacturing, but it seems like the raw materials, labor, delivery and other costs involved in making a ski and snowboard are pretty much the same. Sure there might be subtle differences in material, and the number of boards but overall you're not looking at a difference that's large enough to justify the $200 or so difference in cost.
So my assumption is that there is a higher willingness to pay for skis. This might be due to the fact that traditionaly, those who ski come from higher income families. Maybe their parents were skiers and got their kids into skiing at an early age and these kids continued to become free-skiers whose parents paid for nice skis. Whereas snowboarders might come from lower income families (at least relatively speaking) whose parents did not ski. These kids might have seen snowboarding on TV and thought it was cool and started to snowboard once they could afford it (when they're in high school). Since going to the mountain is not part of their family's culture, they have to buy boards on their own with a high schoolers income, or their parents will buy it but aren't willing to pay as much as skiing parents.
That comparison might be total horse shit, but I do believe that it comes out more when you compare carving skis to twin tips. Again the costs involved in building a carving ski vs twin tips should be minimal but carving skiing are hundreds of dollars more expensive. This is because the older people who buy carving skis have higher incomes and are willling to pay more for them.