Welcome to the Newschoolers forums! You may read the forums as a guest, however you must be a registered member to post. Register to become a member today!
im speaking from my experience. I had stock, average tires on my toyota until late december. It was fine in the snow, but i got 33 inch mickey tompsons and the difference was incredible. My larger tires worked 10 times better in snow than the smaller ones, and the smaller ones were relatively new. And getting larger tires doesnt necesarily mean wider, you can get taller ones without the width, and taller is better
Given the obvious preference for wide rubber over skinny in racing and performance circles, it's easy to assume that wide tires are better in all conditions than their svelte cousins. The truth, however, is a bit more complicated than just putting as much tire on the road as possible.
There are two ways to get traction (a function of friction) on any surface: increase the contact area or increase the pressure per square inch. Skinny tires must carry the same amount of weight as fat tires, but must do so with far less contact with the road. This increases the force in pounds per square inch on the tire tread, theoretically allowing the thinner tire to "cut" into the road surface. You could compare the pressure effects of fat tires to skinny to (respectively) a baseball bat and a samurai sword.
In completely dry conditions, wider and fatter is always better for traction. A dry road and dry tires allow every inch of rubber to grab the road with no interference, so traction increase/decrease is almost linear with tire size. The only downside to larger tires on dry roads is that they can increase steering effort in low-speed conditions. Traction is traction, whether it's rolling forward or swiveling on an axis.
Generally speaking, wider tires will perform better in wet conditions than skinny tires, but it depends on the tread pattern. Wide tires can easily trap water underneath while rolling, making efficient water removal channels (called "sipes") a priority for design. Narrow tires can get away with having fewer sipes because they're not as inclined to trap water underneath and because their higher contact pressure tends to "squish" water out of the way.
The long-held belief that narrow tires are better in snow and ice is generally true. One side effect of high contact pressure is heat, which can, in many cases, squeeze any snow beneath back into its liquid state. When combined with a sipes designed to carry that melted ice and snow away, the end result is a tire that performs far better in winter conditions than wide summer rubber. Wide tires tend to float over the top of ice and snow rather than digging in.
can you please give me some examples on how i have proven time and time again that i am the least informed "little" kids on this website? in this thread, i have just spoken from my personal experience, which i think is better than what the internet states. my truck performed better with wider tires in snow, other trucks may not.