Member of the Month

KilaTsunami
October, 2024

Online

Welcome to the Newschoolers forums! You may read the forums as a guest, however you must be a registered member to post. Register to become a member today!

The Mountain

profile picture
s.erickson
Posts: 504 - Karma: 992
Apr 15 2011 5:03PM
0 0
profile picture
WeSC*
Posts: 71 - Karma: 29
wow.
Apr 15 2011 6:21PM
0 0
profile picture
alexat955
Posts: 2732 - Karma: 112
that was so sick. some of the skies definitely looked fake but this makes me want one of those motorized dollies for timelapses
Apr 15 2011 8:28PM
0 0
profile picture
Shenanigans
Posts: 868 - Karma: 455
Really sick, damn I wish I could see the stars like that from my house
Apr 15 2011 8:39PM
0 0
profile picture
SkiThe603
Posts: 5376 - Karma: 498

Ya so that was nasty, just nasty beyond nasty of nastyness. Like really that was really fucking good, the colors, the movement of the earth and the stars and sky were all ill. I really wanna watch again, i think i will

Apr 15 2011 9:24PM
0 0
profile picture
Banane.
Posts: 3102 - Karma: 414
Same
Apr 15 2011 9:30PM
0 0
profile picture
captainEMERICA
Posts: 1386 - Karma: 122
you could see his shadow in one shot, but other than that it was really really really impressive/moving. It always surprises me how much a film with no characters or plot, something that is just images and sound can move people so much.
Apr 15 2011 10:42PM
0 0
profile picture
TWoods
Posts: 10014 - Karma: 8,386
I've pointed my camera into the night plenty of times, out in the middle of the desert and whatnot. I have NEVER gotten color in the starts like that. Is he just pumping the shit out of saturation?
Apr 15 2011 11:14PM
0 0
profile picture
eheath
Posts: 61601 - Karma: 123,027
Most likely, the scene with the trees and fog was really saturated.
Apr 15 2011 11:17PM
0 0
profile picture
Brentizzle
Posts: 1584 - Karma: 1,871
2 days old and 62000 views. epic. cant even describe what i felt while watching that.
Apr 16 2011 1:22AM
0 0
profile picture
Deezy
Posts: 4580 - Karma: 1,004
uhh... anyone know if this was a video or stills?
Apr 16 2011 10:16AM
0 0
profile picture
Brentizzle
Posts: 1584 - Karma: 1,871
Oh man you fail hard. It's all photos. The astrophotography shots are exposures anywhere from 30sec to 2min I'm assuming from the amount of movement and drag some of the shots have. Timelapses are photos dude.
Apr 16 2011 11:04AM
0 0
profile picture
S.C
Posts: 3068 - Karma: 2,285
timelapses dont have to be photos...

but this was beautiful. amazing.
Apr 16 2011 11:32AM
0 0
profile picture
TWoods
Posts: 10014 - Karma: 8,386
He says you can purchase those shots from him in cinema 4k, so unless he's got a RED those are photos, haha.
Apr 16 2011 11:51AM
0 0
profile picture
michelle
Posts: 6290 - Karma: 428
Amazing
Apr 16 2011 1:34PM
0 0
profile picture
OKay
Posts: 77 - Karma: 12
so ill!
Apr 18 2011 10:31AM
0 0
profile picture
cool.
Posts: 3457 - Karma: 1,724
most likely but he's also 3500m+ on top of a mountain where one of the world's greatest observatories is so i bet there are some amazing colors up there.
Apr 18 2011 1:33PM
0 0
profile picture
mammothpunks
Posts: 5724 - Karma: 372
im sure it was all shot RAW and heavily post processed to get a bunch of the colors. No way your getting that straight out of camera.
Apr 18 2011 9:59PM
0 0
profile picture
jeremy.g
Posts: 4931 - Karma: 459
amazing
Apr 18 2011 11:18PM
0 0
All times are Eastern (-5)