Member of the Month

partyandBS
December, 2024

Online

Welcome to the Newschoolers forums! You may read the forums as a guest, however you must be a registered member to post. Register to become a member today!

No more blue steeles!

profile picture
nskerb
Posts: 228 - Karma: 232

so i was skiing at meadows a couple weeks ago and i saw my coach on on3ps with all the workers except scott... rowen the co owner or sumthin was on these skis for 2012 called the filthy rich. these skis are pretty cool they got these super stealth tips but rocker to clear stuff they are pretty sick but not as cool as the BS, he told me thatt the blue steele was being discontinoud for these i was pretty bummed

Mar 1 2011 9:40PM
0 0
profile picture
49566738265
Posts: 0 - Karma: 7,704
Old news brah
Mar 1 2011 9:41PM
0 0
profile picture
nskerb
Posts: 228 - Karma: 232
oh sorry i guess i just never got the news, thanks for not hating tho
Mar 1 2011 9:42PM
0 0
profile picture
dstriebs
Posts: 396 - Karma: 77
some of this is new to me actually so thanks. sounds pretty interesting. you wouldnt happen to know what sizes they will be coming in would you?
Mar 2 2011 4:31PM
0 0
profile picture
Crispy.
Posts: 6117 - Karma: 7,714
By not as cool do you mean graphics/topsheet or like the actual preformance of the ski?
Mar 2 2011 4:37PM
0 0
profile picture
pigglywiggly
Posts: 4482 - Karma: 305
yeah curious abut this as well. ill need a new park ski to replace my blue steeles from this year and thinking these, gbutters, or moment vices. just need some more info on these though first
Mar 2 2011 5:07PM
0 0
profile picture
noparking
Posts: 1123 - Karma: 50
there is a video that was posted by the on3p guys that had the topsheets in it. i had the chance to ski these skis a little over a month ago and they were very fun.
Mar 2 2011 5:20PM
0 0
profile picture
Aaaron.
Posts: 11817 - Karma: 903
didn't you just get the blue steeles this season?
Mar 2 2011 5:31PM
0 0
profile picture
Juice.Doctor
Posts: 2791 - Karma: 293
agree more info needed
Mar 2 2011 5:31PM
0 0
profile picture
pigglywiggly
Posts: 4482 - Karma: 305
yeah, edge is pulling out from the top. im making a summer set up and will be skiing it a lot over the summer so i figure ill bash the hell out of them anyways. i have money but nothing to spend it on, so thats also how i justify buying new skis haha
Mar 2 2011 6:28PM
0 0
profile picture
BenWhit
Posts: 4654 - Karma: 3,257
i've always wanted a pair of these.
Mar 2 2011 6:40PM
0 0
profile picture
RudyGarmisch
Posts: 25443 - Karma: 13,844
More gradual elliptical rocker on the replacement ski, longer rocker, different sidecut profile that works with the rocker to allow you to carve sharper turns the more you heel it over, way better for carving off jumps than the Blue Steele. Its been designed from the start with rocker in mind, allowed us to try out some ideas and we're happy with the way it works.

Sizes and specs will be released in May, cant say much yet because we're still getting feedback from our riders and playing around with stuff.
Mar 2 2011 9:50PM
0 0
profile picture
hippystinx
Posts: 937 - Karma: 171
make long skis 190 something maybe
Mar 2 2011 10:19PM
0 0
profile picture
Abc567def
Posts: 8756 - Karma: 801
Yea i want a park ski at around 186-188
Mar 2 2011 10:21PM
0 0
profile picture
A-Style**
Posts: 1831 - Karma: 81
Threads
Mar 2 2011 10:57PM
0 0
profile picture
T.O.
Posts: 740 - Karma: 97
Anything in 160 size range
Mar 2 2011 11:20PM
0 0
profile picture
pigglywiggly
Posts: 4482 - Karma: 305
That sounds sooo sick. Im glad the rocker is goig to be more gradual and long rather than short and abrupt on my blue steeles. If its a 87-92 waist, symmetrical and medium flex I will be beyond stoked
Mar 2 2011 11:23PM
0 0
profile picture
Crispy.
Posts: 6117 - Karma: 7,714
You guys should make like a 176cm. How will the price compare to BS?
Mar 3 2011 7:43AM
0 0
profile picture
Juice.Doctor
Posts: 2791 - Karma: 293
you just described my dream ski.
Mar 3 2011 8:42AM
0 0
profile picture
SkiTheYeast
Posts: 2310 - Karma: 391
Threads
Mar 3 2011 9:38AM
0 0
profile picture
Billups
Posts: 3960 - Karma: 329
Little richard is getting a pro model, how nice.
Mar 3 2011 10:37AM
0 0
profile picture
DUKES
Posts: 5150 - Karma: 691
a 185-187cm, 92 mm underfoot, symmetrical, with rocker. would be the ultimate park ski for us giants
Mar 3 2011 10:54AM
0 0
profile picture
BASEDRILEY
Posts: 1451 - Karma: 898

sizes should be 166/ 176/ 186

Mar 3 2011 4:46PM
0 0
profile picture
belden...
Posts: 2914 - Karma: 1,274
no there should be a 191
Mar 3 2011 4:54PM
0 0
profile picture
BASEDRILEY
Posts: 1451 - Karma: 898
i really dont care what the sizes are aslong as theres a 164-168 size
Mar 3 2011 4:59PM
0 0
profile picture
DUKES
Posts: 5150 - Karma: 691
well then you care about the sizes
Mar 3 2011 5:22PM
0 0
profile picture
ndye
Posts: 3756 - Karma: 7,094
probably wouldnt sell to a large enough group to be very successful. And park skis get noodly really easily if they get too long.
Mar 3 2011 5:24PM
0 0
profile picture
Matty_K
Posts: 575 - Karma: 222
so if I'm 5'11 I should get the 181?
Mar 3 2011 6:31PM
0 0
profile picture
Matty_K
Posts: 575 - Karma: 222
I mean 186*

sorry for dub post.
Mar 3 2011 6:31PM
0 0
profile picture
dstriebs
Posts: 396 - Karma: 77
they havent even released the sizes yet. but I agree with the people saying there should be a 176.
Mar 4 2011 12:21AM
0 0
profile picture
Balto
Posts: 25985 - Karma: 4,404
man up, they are rockered so they ski shorter, unless you're 5'7", 181 will be fine
Mar 4 2011 12:28AM
0 0
profile picture
BASEDRILEY
Posts: 1451 - Karma: 898
tell that to issac he skis 173's and is 5 11
Mar 4 2011 12:35AM
0 0
profile picture
dstriebs
Posts: 396 - Karma: 77
im 5' 9" 148 lbs and ride 181 j mos and they are perfect for all mountain but I would like something a little shorter and easier to throw around for my park skis. man up? haha im sick of everybody thinking they are "real men" because they ride skis half a foot over their head.
Mar 4 2011 12:41AM
0 0
profile picture
Mr_pretzel
Posts: 4616 - Karma: 1,290
That does make you a real man.
Mar 4 2011 2:26AM
0 0
profile picture
Session
Posts: 5394 - Karma: 22,364
191 or GTFO
Mar 4 2011 2:39AM
0 0
profile picture
special_k10101
Posts: 1498 - Karma: 72
they sound like sick skis but OP, that is one epic run-on sentence.
Mar 4 2011 5:06AM
0 0
profile picture
ndye
Posts: 3756 - Karma: 7,094
No, it makes you extremely trendy. Sure if your going stupid big you need the larger skis, but most of us on here are just hitting 25-40 foot jumps and sliding some rails. If we are doing pipe we are going below 8 feet out max. It doesn't make you a man to constantly ride the longest ski they make regardless of your height.
Mar 4 2011 6:36AM
0 0
profile picture
SkiTheYeast
Posts: 2310 - Karma: 391
I am 5'7 so 176cm
Mar 4 2011 7:56AM
0 0
profile picture
pigglywiggly
Posts: 4482 - Karma: 305
this right here
Mar 4 2011 8:43AM
0 0
profile picture
nskerb
Posts: 228 - Karma: 232
the ski, the way they made the rocker on  this ski fucks it for anything but park i think
Mar 4 2011 10:04AM
0 0
profile picture
Mr_pretzel
Posts: 4616 - Karma: 1,290
Then get the jmo.

I want a ski that slays park super hard. Its a park ski its supposed to ski park not all mtn.

Also lower rocker is better than abrupt rocker for skiing pow.
Mar 4 2011 10:44AM
0 0
profile picture
Balto
Posts: 25985 - Karma: 4,404
its a dedicated park ski, its not designed to be skied out of the park, thats what jmos are for.
Mar 4 2011 2:10PM
0 0
profile picture
omIV
Posts: 1950 - Karma: 306
Owner of OG Blue Steeles, right hurr. Pre-rocker shit. Lovin it.
Mar 4 2011 2:16PM
0 0
profile picture
A-Style**
Posts: 1831 - Karma: 81
Same here, fucking awesome skis. Too bad I can't ski them anymore
Mar 4 2011 2:28PM
0 0
profile picture
RudyGarmisch
Posts: 25443 - Karma: 13,844
Elliptical rocker is going on the Cease and Desist, Billy Goat, Pillowfight... everything we've tried it on so far we like more than the old rocker. Its different and skis need to be designed a little around it, but its sooooo good in variable snow its redic, you just feel so stable on edge, you dont get that hookey feel that some rockered skis give you.
Mar 4 2011 3:45PM
0 0
profile picture
iggyskier
Posts: 10451 - Karma: 10,021
Not really sure who you talked to about the skis but the filthy rich skis WAY better outside the park than the blue steele. Not even a contest between the two.

Inside the park, it is a bit less playful but way way more stable and solid. It carves off jumps way better and is significantly more solid on landing and take off of big hits.
Mar 4 2011 4:16PM
0 0
profile picture
Mr_pretzel
Posts: 4616 - Karma: 1,290
Can you explain elliptical rocker too me?
Mar 4 2011 4:44PM
0 0
profile picture
pigglywiggly
Posts: 4482 - Karma: 305
im going to guess its going to be something like the shape of the 2012's. just my guess when i think long gradual rocker
Mar 4 2011 4:49PM
0 0
profile picture
RudyGarmisch
Posts: 25443 - Karma: 13,844
Sure! Its easiest to think of this as an equation actually. Put the ski on a graph so that the origin is where the rocker starts in the side profile.

Classical rocker, at least for us, had the rocker emerge from the ski at an angle (say, like the equation y=x/4 or something), and then after a distance you would have a set tip curve.

Elliptical is just that, its an ellipse. It gradually turns sharper and sharper. If we're talking tip shape, its like the lower right quadrant of the ellipse in this picture.

Click for larger image

So the theres no real point where the rocker stops and the tip shape starts, they just slow into each other, and the rocker starts very gradually, so theres no hard point on the ski, making it way more stable since everything just transitions into the shape, instead of abruptly.

Theres way more behind this, but I dont want to give too much away.
Mar 4 2011 5:33PM
0 0
profile picture
Mr_pretzel
Posts: 4616 - Karma: 1,290
Thanks!

It actually makes alot of sense to put that on a ski.

Cant wait to pick up a pair of Filthy riches.
Mar 5 2011 2:58AM
0 0
profile picture
Canuker
Posts: 4730 - Karma: 165
i cant wait to see a pair!
Mar 5 2011 11:51AM
0 0
All times are Eastern (-5)