It looks like you are using an ad blocker. That's okay. Who doesn't? But without advertising revenue, we can't keep making this site awesome. Click the link below for instructions on disabling adblock.
Welcome to the Newschoolers forums! You may read the forums as a guest, however you must be a registered member to post.
Register to become a member today!
well you could rodeo 7, then as you come around on the last 180 drop your shoulder like a misty? im not sure if thatd work, it would be fucked up either way
Yep, someone will do it eventually. Try it a rodeo 7 to misty 5, or rodeo 7 to frontflip off of a diving board and you will see that its possible, nobodys had the balls to try it on snow yet though.
A misty is a forward inversion with a spin, a rodeo is its counterpart, backward inversion with a spin.
After you did the rodeo 7, you would be flat and back on the normal plane. To do a misty from this position, you would have to physically defy physics, stop the momentum of the backwards inversion, and reverse it.
Not possible.
There of course will be arguments now, but its because of a nomenclature disagreement that occurs in switch tricks. A switch backflip is a backflip, but you take off switch, land switch.
But a switch rodeo 7, if we were going off those same lines, is actually a switch misty 7. From the riders perspective, you throw a misty 7 and a switch rodeo 7 the exact same - only difference is that you start and land switch on the latter.
This discrepancy, in my opinion, really fucks with trick nomenclature, especially now that we're getting into almost SSX like shit... but its probably too late to change anything, and half the time nobody actually knows what they're talking about anyways on NS.
Except that rodeo and misty aren't opposites.... d spin and misty pretty much are... rodeo you're pretty much flipping while completely sideways vs. misty where you are spinning while completely sideways... and yea the trick is probably doable considering when you bring it around to 7 you do have forward momentum which you could use to set the misty...
after looking at the pistol flip again i am almost convinced that that is exactly what he did. his right shoulder goes under rather than over on the first flip
A D-spin is cork thats so off axis that the riders feet go above his head. As far as I know, nobody's done a bio-d-spin thingy, but I'd like to see it if someone has.
what would this be called? b-spin? i'll take credit for that one.
to the kid who said that rodeos and misties aren't counter-rotations. is a true rodeo not inverted to the point where at some point during the manuever, the riders feet are directly over his head? does this not also occur in a misty?
I was going to say the same thing. Well not really, as I couldn't explain it. But I went through the rodeo 5 to misty 5 in my head and it just didn't seem possible at all. As the NS saying goes... "your momentum is wrong".
I have done this on the tramp but more like misty 5 to backflip. It's pretty sick but it's actually easier to get around if you lay out the first one and twist into the second.
It was after I creamed on your mom. Try a rodeo 7 to front or to misty off a diving board you dumbfuck- its possible. The reason you don't think its possible is because you haven't tried it. Look at the pistol flip-super similar trick.
i still dont understand how people can see a difference between a bio9, a flat 9 and a rodeo 9. it s all the fucking same, ie cool forward off axis spin.
for 7 i think that rodeo 7 and flat 7 look really the same, and bio 7 is fucking close.
rodeos are to mistys exactly the same as backflips are to frontflips, so yes this would work, but anyone who tried it would have the problem of their giant balls getting in the way
go try a rodeo 7 on skis and you'll realize that skiing is completely different than jumping on a diving board, you dumb fuck. the reason you think its possible is because you've never done one. you might as well think rodeo 450 to pretz 2 out is possible.