Member of the Month

KilaTsunami
October, 2024

Online

Welcome to the Newschoolers forums! You may read the forums as a guest, however you must be a registered member to post. Register to become a member today!

I made a dubstep track! Listen;D

profile picture
Fenty
Posts: 92 - Karma: 11
The Way I See by Fenty

Made it today.
170 bpm dubstep track

Fenty - The Way I See


Still a work in progress, but I want som critique. Rate please :D
Nov 22 2010 3:40PM
0 0
profile picture
Fenty
Posts: 92 - Karma: 11
no one?
Nov 22 2010 4:49PM
0 0
profile picture
eheath
Posts: 61475 - Karma: 122,089
Don't make dubstep.
Nov 22 2010 5:11PM
0 0
profile picture
Yung_Gnarley
Posts: 9092 - Karma: 3,022
That's not dubstep.
Nov 22 2010 5:13PM
0 0
profile picture
TijmenDal
Posts: 4849 - Karma: 1,295
I don't know what defines dubstep apart from that it's shit and that it's got a snare on the 3rd beat.

But yeah, 'Heat is pretty much right...
Nov 22 2010 5:20PM
0 0
profile picture
A.Eberhard
Posts: 4426 - Karma: 415
Not very good not gonna lie.
Nov 22 2010 5:32PM
0 0
profile picture
Bukkakeskitrip
Posts: 5677 - Karma: 95
too trancy. too fast. but i see you have good production skills, so keep at it. ive enjoyed your other stuff as well.
Nov 22 2010 5:38PM
0 0
profile picture
Fenty
Posts: 92 - Karma: 11
Well, this is dubstep. It does not have to be 140 bpm to be a dubstep track.

But I see you point. I made it slower and I'll add a more hardcore and faster wobble, and then its a dubstep track like every other dubstep track.
Nov 22 2010 5:54PM
0 0
profile picture
EC-Skier
Posts: 3899 - Karma: 668
why?, if it was good, go right ahead
Nov 22 2010 5:59PM
0 0
profile picture
Bukkakeskitrip
Posts: 5677 - Karma: 95
i never said it had to be 140. im just saying i thought it was too fast. dont take it personally dude, its positive criticism =). and no, dont do that. just those synths were a bit overpowering (in my opinion).
Nov 22 2010 6:01PM
0 0
profile picture
Fenty
Posts: 92 - Karma: 11
I wasn't talking to you, your critique was the only one i apreciated!
But now I made another version:


140 BPM
Nov 22 2010 6:08PM
0 0
profile picture
Bukkakeskitrip
Posts: 5677 - Karma: 95
sounds good dude, 1:10 onwards is dope.

and i dont know if its because im listening to it on laptop speakers, but it seems very midrangey (sp?). add some low freq layers in and it will sound very nice. if you already have, i will kindly gtfo =)
Nov 22 2010 6:18PM
0 0
profile picture
SeanTom
Posts: 7936 - Karma: 1,747
i like the 140 better but i think it needs to be heavier in general after the drop. I can hear good stuff but it need to be more defined. it sounds like the whole track is an elongated introduction
Nov 22 2010 8:52PM
0 0
profile picture
icantskiiFILM
Posts: 2113 - Karma: 140
you dont make it slower...but put it in cut time. that makes it seem slower..plus its all the lead synths in there that make it a lot more progressivy
Nov 22 2010 10:59PM
0 0
profile picture
Fenty
Posts: 92 - Karma: 11
No, the track was fast. It is 170 bpm, almost all dubstep track are 140
Nov 23 2010 2:19AM
0 0
profile picture
Fenty
Posts: 92 - Karma: 11
No, the track was fast. It is 170 bpm, almost all dubstep track are 140
Nov 23 2010 2:24AM
0 0
profile picture
Dustin.
Posts: 13839 - Karma: 7,704
Isn't Dubstep a shitty artist?  Not a genre?
Nov 23 2010 11:18AM
0 0
All times are Eastern (-5)