Member of the Month

KilaTsunami
October, 2024

Online

Welcome to the Newschoolers forums! You may read the forums as a guest, however you must be a registered member to post. Register to become a member today!

What's this photo effect ?

profile picture
freestyle180
Posts: 87 - Karma: 51
hi guys, do you konw what is this photo effect ?
http://charleswilliamphotography.files.wordpress.com/2010/10/dsc_6345.jpg
Nov 21 2010 10:43PM
0 0
profile picture
MFM
Posts: 842 - Karma: 77
what are you talking about specifically?
It's film
its shot landscape
guys pretty stoked
shallow depth of field
some nice bokeh

you just stoked that it looks artsy and vintage?


Nov 21 2010 11:00PM
0 0
profile picture
*Fujative*
Posts: 8554 - Karma: 183
looks like a little desaturation
Nov 21 2010 11:00PM
0 0
profile picture
Aenigma
Posts: 11256 - Karma: 424
High ISO and over-sharpening?

You're going to need to be more specific.
Nov 21 2010 11:03PM
0 0
profile picture
Brock.
Posts: 5698 - Karma: 1,332
the shallow DOF? some pretty legit focus pulling went into this.
Nov 21 2010 11:19PM
0 0
profile picture
thisandthatfilms
Posts: 7714 - Karma: 526
thats an ill photo.. but im pretty sure it wasnt edited
Nov 21 2010 11:26PM
0 0
profile picture
canterbury
Posts: 2382 - Karma: 55
are you kidding? what pro photog doesn't edit/tweak their shots?
Nov 22 2010 1:22AM
0 0
profile picture
SCOO-WOOP
Posts: 1264 - Karma: 244
I think it was just a heat of the moment shot that got all that right...
Nov 22 2010 1:24AM
0 0
profile picture
Mezmerize19
Posts: 6475 - Karma: 18
the one who got the perfect shot.
Nov 22 2010 3:51AM
0 0
profile picture
h.yfoskett
Posts: 285 - Karma: 219
.
Nov 22 2010 6:43AM
0 0
profile picture
freestyle180
Posts: 87 - Karma: 51
i know about dof. probably high iso but im talking about colors, maybe desaturation like fujative said
Nov 22 2010 8:10AM
0 0
profile picture
michelle
Posts: 6290 - Karma: 428
Probably from the wrong white balance because of the funky lighting situation. So either the photographers film was balanced for a light source that was close to the one he was working with, or they used a preset on their camera rather than creating a custom white balance. Because it's kinda close, but not close enough
Nov 22 2010 10:13AM
0 0
profile picture
.jr
Posts: 5313 - Karma: 356
I swear some people just make shit up.
Nov 22 2010 12:20PM
0 0
profile picture
michelle
Posts: 6290 - Karma: 428
And what's your explanation for it?
Nov 22 2010 12:30PM
0 0
profile picture
.jr
Posts: 5313 - Karma: 356
Too many things to correct, this was NOT shot on film, this was shot on a D700 at ISO 2500 which I wouldn't ever consider to be high ISO for the D700. He shot it with a 300mm at 2.8, and he brought down the vibrancy (not saturation), and crushed the blacks in Lightroom. It was given standard sharpening on export.

/thread.
Nov 22 2010 12:43PM
0 0
profile picture
freestyle180
Posts: 87 - Karma: 51
thanks despite.. i wasnt shure if it was vibrance. when did you found the spec for the picture ?
Nov 22 2010 2:47PM
0 0
profile picture
.jr
Posts: 5313 - Karma: 356
Exif Data, open the photo in Photoshop and hit command-control-shift- I and that will give you the file info..
Nov 22 2010 3:18PM
0 0
All times are Eastern (-5)