It looks like you are using an ad blocker. That's okay. Who doesn't? But without advertising revenue, we can't keep making this site awesome. Click the link below for instructions on disabling adblock.
Welcome to the Newschoolers forums! You may read the forums as a guest, however you must be a registered member to post.
Register to become a member today!
that movie is pretty scary. but well made as well so christians who watch it and agree with whats going on wont be offended. but its still pretty fucked up in my opinion
I feel so SORRY for these kids... This is so sad to watch, because this Levi kid and Rachael seem really intelligent for their age. To put their minds into waste like this is heartbreaking.
I agree.. the Levi kid especially is scary.. cause he is so charismatic and well spoken for a kid of his age..imagine what he'll be when is older.. and to see that put to this intense go to war for the lord mentality is just a bit frightening.
Coming from a family who's religious on my mothers side, I can tell you those kids aren't brainwashed. There is no "you can't get out of this, you HAVE to believe this" type of atmosphere.
I agree it comes off pretty strong in this video but regardless of whether or not you agree with what they're saying, they're not bad people because of what they believe.
Any kid who is told something time after time is probably gonna stick with that for the rest of his/her life. I think it should be illegal for anybody under the age of 10 to enter a church.
Nicholas Copernicus
Sir Francis Bacon
Johannes Kepler
Galileo Galilei
Rene Descartes
Isaac Newton
Robert Boyle
Michael Faraday
Gregor Mendel
William Thomson Kelvin
Max Planck
and
Albert Einstein
>implying Einstein wasn't an atheist.
>implying being atheist during their times wouldn't have gotten them shunned from society at best and killed at worst.
>implying Galileo wasn't right and the church didn't imprison him because he proved how stupid their beleifs are.
Everyone who believes in God completely fails at logical reasoning when it comes to their belief in God. I'm reading Descartes right now, its fucking ridiculous how smart he is up until he tries to prove God exists and fails miserably.
"To what extent are you influenced by Christianity?"
"As a child I received instruction both in the Bible and in the Talmud. I am
a Jew, but I am enthralled by the luminous figure of the Nazarene."
"Have you read Emil Ludwig’s book on Jesus?"
"Emil Ludwig’s Jesus is shallow. Jesus is too colossal for the pen of
phrasemongers, however artful. No man can dispose of Christianity with a bon
mot!"
"You accept the historical existence of Jesus?"
"Unquestionably! No one can read the Gospels without feeling the actual
presence of Jesus. His personality pulsates in every word. No myth is filled
with such life."
G. S. Viereck, "What Life Means to Einstein," Saturday Evening Post,
26 October 1929; Schlagschatten, Sechsundzwanzig Schicksalsfragen an
Grosse der Zeit (Vogt-Schild, Solothurn, 1930), p. 60; Glimpses of
the Great (Macauley, New York, 1930), pp. 373-374.
now that's silly. if you knew anything of the bible at all you'd know of the part where it say's something around you won't ask God to prove his existence.
if you can't ask for his existence to be proven you are trusting a belief
that's the same damn thing they said in the beginning of the video about evolution
not that complicated
"My position concerning God is that of an agnostic.
I am convinced that a vivid consciousness of the primary importance of
moral principles for the betterment and ennoblement of life does not
need the idea of a law-giver, especially a law-giver who works on the
basis of reward and punishment."
"It was, of course, a lie what you read about my religious convictions,
a lie which is being systematically repeated. I do not believe in a
personal God and I have never denied this but have expressed it
clearly. If something is in me which can be called religious then it is
the unbounded admiration for the structure of the world so far as our
science can reveal it."
"[...] The word God is for me nothing more than the expression and
product of human weaknesses, the Bible a collection of honourable, but
still primitive legends which are nevertheless pretty childish. No
interpretation no matter how subtle can (for me) change this.
These [...] interpretations are highly manifold according to their
nature and have almost nothing to do with the original text. For me the
Jewish religion like all other religions is an incarnation of the most
childish superstitions. And the Jewish people to whom I gladly belong
and with whose mentality I have a deep affinity have no different
quality for me than all other people. As far as my experience goes,
they are also no better than other human groups, although they are
protected from the worst cancers by a lack of power. Otherwise I cannot
see anything 'chosen' about them."
I'm not an atheist. I don't think I can call myself a pantheist. THE PROBLEM INVOLVED IS TOO VAST FOR OUR LIMITED MINDS. We are in the
position of a little child entering a huge library filled with books in
many languages. The child knows someone must have written those books.
It does not know how. It does not understand the languages in which they
are written. The child dimly suspects a mysterious order in the
arrangement of the books but doesn't know what it is. That, it seems to
me, is the attitude of even the most intelligent human being toward God.
We see the universe marvelously arranged and obeying certain laws but
only dimly understand these laws.
Granted. Regardless, Einstein was at best an agnostic, and most definitely denied the existence of a "personal" god. The argument that "some smart people were religious" is a stupid appeal to authority that really means nothing at all. It still does not refute the point that anyone who does believe in a perfect, all-knowing/loving/caring personal god who created everything and answers prayer etc. has fundamentally flawed logic when it comes to justifying their beliefs.