Member of the Month

je_t.aime_canard
January, 2025

Online

Welcome to the Newschoolers forums! You may read the forums as a guest, however you must be a registered member to post. Register to become a member today!

Armada tell Rossignol to cease and desist.

profile picture
-Tristan-
Posts: 915 - Karma: 19
Obviously not the little guy anymore.



Sorry if this is a repost, I searched and found nothing.

Oct 25 2010 11:45PM
0 0
profile picture
PaleCelery
Posts: 7228 - Karma: 609
Link is broken... I googled this though and I find it fairly interesting. I'm surprised it isnt bigger news on here?

From my understanding they are saying that rossignol is biting their elf shoe tech... interesting to see if it holds up in court. My guess is that it wont.
Oct 26 2010 12:11AM
0 0
profile picture
Chaka
Posts: 424 - Karma: 79
Who knows what this could lead to. I think this is just another good reminder that the ski industry is only just a business.
Oct 26 2010 12:14AM
0 0
profile picture
Gstrong
Posts: 4776 - Karma: 519
http://www.exoticskis.com/ExoticSkis/Industry/Rossignol_ArmadaPatents/Rossignol_v_Aramada_2010Oct_Complaint_Case%20210-cv-01008-CW.pdf

ahaha
Oct 26 2010 12:14AM
0 0
profile picture
Yung_Gnarley
Posts: 9095 - Karma: 3,073
so dumb
Oct 26 2010 12:49AM
0 0
profile picture
jeremy.g
Posts: 4931 - Karma: 459
ski companies need to stop suing ski companies. its only gonna hurt the industry in the long run.
Oct 26 2010 1:20AM
0 0
profile picture
Myfirstname.
Posts: 1581 - Karma: 312
What? That's crazy. Sounds like a lame move on armada's part, but we'll see once i have a little more information.
Oct 26 2010 2:08AM
0 0
profile picture
Tablespoon
Posts: 923 - Karma: 14
Not a cool move by Armada at all.
Oct 26 2010 4:16AM
0 0
profile picture
wrenegade
Posts: 6631 - Karma: 41
This is a grade a douchebag move by Armada. Their ARG was a straight up copy of DPS' Lotus 138. And that is the exact reason I bought it at the time. Shane is the only one who could have any sort of patent on this technology, hell JP mentioned in the ARG's original description on their website how without Shane's ideas, the ski would have never came to fruition!

Fuck Armada.
Oct 26 2010 5:06AM
0 0
profile picture
paige.
Posts: 1932 - Karma: 926
That argument won't go far in the legal world. DPS (I assume) didn't have the technology patented. Maybe Armada copying their design was unethical, but legally they were in the clear. However, Armada has already demonstrated that in this instance the technology is 'theirs' and that is why they were given the patent in the first place. If Rossignol's technology is shown to be especially similar to Armada's Armada is legally in the right. And as much as I hate to see this happening in the ski industry, I can understand why they would feel the need to protect their claims. It is something they put their time and money into developing.
Oct 26 2010 5:41AM
0 0
profile picture
starsky_hucks
Posts: 394 - Karma: 62

Armada has sent cease and desist letters to a number of small and large ski companies claiming their models infringe upon Armada's patented geometry. One of those companies is Rossignol.

who else?

hasnt the ski community shown thats it not ok to take legal action against another company..

Scott has lost all credibility for going after on3p, take a leaf armada...

Oct 26 2010 6:56AM
0 0
profile picture
onenerdykid
Posts: 6714 - Karma: 11,500
as I understand it, it will involve anyone else that wants to use camber under foot and early rise in the tip and tail- pretty much every company in the entire ski industry.
Oct 26 2010 7:00AM
0 0
profile picture
nutsnbolts
Posts: 1110 - Karma: 16
Id like to see Armada take this one, not a huge fan of rossy, although i loooove my rossy poles
Oct 26 2010 8:34AM
0 0
profile picture
steve0
Posts: 1135 - Karma: 1,330

After reading that whole thing, Armada is basically fucked. It seems Rossi had already pattented their "Elf Shoe Technology" Back in 2006. Armada has a pattent on what is essentially the same technology but didn't recieve the pattent until 2010. They're gonna lose this one fair and square. Grab your JJ's while you can because I'm predicting they get pulled from production.

Oct 26 2010 8:58AM
0 0
profile picture
nutsnbolts
Posts: 1110 - Karma: 16
Bummmmmmmmer
Oct 26 2010 9:00AM
0 0
profile picture
Session
Posts: 5403 - Karma: 22,510
Are you stupid? Do you realize what kind of precedence that would set in the ski industry? Patenting a range of shapes hurts the consumer, and makes the industry stale. And this can only end up bad for Armada. Just like the whole Scott deal. They have the most sack ridden pro in the industry on their ski's. Yet the only place I ever see them is on Tramdock, and I sure as hell don't see them on the hill.

Douche move by Armada
Oct 26 2010 9:57AM
0 0
profile picture
Chompo.
Posts: 4952 - Karma: 88
Dumb move by armada, but I love my jj's
Oct 26 2010 10:27AM
0 0
profile picture
wrenegade
Posts: 6631 - Karma: 41
DPS had a number of patents in place before Armada released the ARG or the JJ. A 5 dimensional ski is not something they invented. This is absolute bullshit and could set a horrible precedent for the ski industry. Rossignol has lawyered-up and already counter-sued them and they surely have deeper pockets to see this one through.

Paging JD to the white legal courtesy phone. What's your take?
Oct 26 2010 11:31AM
0 0
profile picture
Scrambles
Posts: 2270 - Karma: 63
quick! somebody put a patent on cambered skis!
Oct 26 2010 11:51AM
0 0
profile picture
PaleCelery
Posts: 7228 - Karma: 609
doubt that, rossignol is struggling right now. Read the article in powder magazine this month.

And I guess the issue here isn't so much the camber underfoot/ rocker tip and tail combo, its the technology where the tip taper starts at the same place that the rocker does.

I am very interested to see how this whole debacle turns out
Oct 26 2010 12:25PM
0 0
profile picture
Tablespoon
Posts: 923 - Karma: 14
Holy fuck you are dumb.
If Armada won this, this would suck major butt for the entire Industry.
Oct 26 2010 12:44PM
0 0
profile picture
PaleCelery
Posts: 7228 - Karma: 609
Agree, this kid is retarded. It would set a terrible precedent. Then whats next? Claiming that the dimensions of a ski are too similar

Also, this should be moved to ski gabber IMO
Oct 26 2010 3:33PM
0 0
profile picture
Pklink04
Posts: 5608 - Karma: 392
What about the AR5, Armada totally based their design from the Rossi Scratch.
Oct 26 2010 4:36PM
0 0
profile picture
a_pla5tic_bag
Posts: 9234 - Karma: 5,569
anyone who doesn't like rossi probably doesn't think they're core enough. ski companies suing other ski companies is dumb. Plus there's tons of skis with similar shapes.
Oct 26 2010 5:13PM
0 0
profile picture
RudyGarmisch
Posts: 25443 - Karma: 13,844
And all the companies that make those shapes could get royally screwed by whichever company wins patent rights on the technology. Which is why this whole thing is basically really really really uncool.
Oct 26 2010 5:24PM
0 0
profile picture
RudyGarmisch
Posts: 25443 - Karma: 13,844
Please please please post this in the thread about this on TGR, your voice needs to be heard.
Oct 26 2010 5:25PM
0 0
profile picture
wrenegade
Posts: 6631 - Karma: 41
This should be in Ski Gabber, be stickied, and everyone who cares about the ski industry should write an email to Armada to tell them to back the fuck off. This could snowball into a big fucking disaster where everyone has to lawyer-up to defend their product. Many companies (indies especially) would have to close their doors if they ever had to defend themselves against Amer Sports (Atomic, Salomon) or K2 Inc. or any other of the majors as the legal fees would bleed them dry, even if they had done nothing wrong. This is absolutely disgusting. I will never purchase another Armada product again.
Oct 26 2010 5:31PM
0 0
profile picture
a_pla5tic_bag
Posts: 9234 - Karma: 5,569
yeah I know. that would be horrible too. and I wish i could double quote cause your post right under the one I quoted is funny.
Oct 26 2010 5:53PM
0 0
profile picture
Scrambles
Posts: 2270 - Karma: 63
boycott jj's if they win
Oct 26 2010 6:01PM
0 0
profile picture
Jonny7
Posts: 3309 - Karma: 76
honestly that's lame from Armada, hope the thread gets stickied and that Armada will read it.
Oct 26 2010 6:06PM
0 0
profile picture
DHogg
Posts: 3462 - Karma: 239
I really hope this backfires for armada. Such a weak move.

Oct 26 2010 6:09PM
0 0
profile picture
.Duncan.
Posts: 1375 - Karma: 459
Well this makes me regret my purchase of alpha 2's :(
Oct 26 2010 6:12PM
0 0
profile picture
pigglywiggly
Posts: 4482 - Karma: 305
Fuck that. Boycott all of Armada. This is one of the biggest dick moves someone could try to pull off.
Oct 26 2010 6:21PM
0 0
profile picture
no_steeze
Posts: 23992 - Karma: 4,274
fuck armada, seriously. i'm gonna patent the next shit i take and sue whoever takes a shit that resembles the shape of mine
Oct 26 2010 6:23PM
0 0
profile picture
arandomname
Posts: 1989 - Karma: 18

He really needs to.

And I feel like some people are reading the thread in TGR then bringing it here to act like they know their shit because everything I've seen hear I saw in the TGR thread.

But really, fuck Armada.  I'm about to send Armada an e-mail with links to this thread and the TGR thread, just to show them how much they're fucking themselves over.

Oct 26 2010 6:35PM
0 0
profile picture
no_steeze
Posts: 23992 - Karma: 4,274
but then they'll know it was you who sent the email!!


plus if that's not enough incentive, it's a terrible idea
Oct 26 2010 6:37PM
0 0
profile picture
arandomname
Posts: 1989 - Karma: 18

then bringing information found from there*

And to Gator, I wouldn't care if they know it was me.  I'm going to send them that e-mail after I eat dinner.  While I'm gone, someone wanna give me an e-mail that they would actually see?

Oct 26 2010 6:43PM
0 0
profile picture
Phormat
Posts: 774 - Karma: 20
It doesn't make sense that having both camber and rocker is even patentable. I mean both technologies existed separately and frankly it really isn't that innovative to combine both. Rossignol was having some financial trouble, so if this is Armadas attempt to sweep them under the table that blows.
Oct 26 2010 6:44PM
0 0
profile picture
Ben.
Posts: 21463 - Karma: 683
lol this quote already made TGR
Oct 26 2010 7:15PM
0 0
profile picture
summersover
Posts: 5777 - Karma: 233
that is some fucking bullshit
Oct 26 2010 7:23PM
0 0
profile picture
Phormat
Posts: 774 - Karma: 20
Sadly NS got ripped on again. I still loled
Oct 26 2010 7:23PM
0 0
profile picture
-Tristan-
Posts: 915 - Karma: 19
If a mod wants to move this to Ski Gabber I'm all for it. Thought it might be more of a gear related issue but it needs to get out there.

This could set some really shitty precedents in the ski industry. Imagine if Elan were the only company out there allowed to make skis with sidecut, if Line were the only ones making twin tips, or if K2, Volant (although I dont think they own any patents) or even DPS for that matter were the only company out there making rockered skis. Those are extreme examples but if Armada set a precedent concerning ski patents here it could mean the end of most small companies as we know them as well as any competition between larger brands.

I cant even believe I'm writing this about a company I once considered as one of the most innovative and respectable ski brands out there. I think McConkey would be pretty unimpressed right about now.
Oct 26 2010 7:25PM
0 0
profile picture
paige.
Posts: 1932 - Karma: 926
My bad. I'd always assumed that Armada had taken the designs from DPS before DPS had patented them.

Does anyone know the details of Armada's patent? Because I assume it would have to be pretty specific with regards to how the ski is constructed etc. But if it really is just pretty much any ski with camber + early rise that is ridiculous. I can't see them winning that (though I don't really see how they could get a patent for something that vague in the first place).
Oct 26 2010 7:26PM
0 0
profile picture
Scrambles
Posts: 2270 - Karma: 63
lololol i saw that too
Oct 26 2010 7:32PM
0 0
profile picture
Newschool_Pope
Posts: 2473 - Karma: 267

is tanner drunk again or how did they get this BS idea?

this is just sad for the skiing community and the industry.
Oct 26 2010 7:56PM
0 0
profile picture
207
Posts: 8969 - Karma: 3,851
Tanner is probably drunk, like I wish I was joking.

This is sick, the ski industry cannot do this to one another.
Oct 26 2010 7:57PM
0 0
profile picture
ace_
Posts: 3189 - Karma: 39
sheit
Oct 26 2010 8:01PM
0 0
profile picture
greenman
Posts: 945 - Karma: 27
i dont see this ending well for anyone
Oct 26 2010 8:02PM
0 0
profile picture
j.bird
Posts: 6680 - Karma: 15
hahhahahahahhahahahhaahahahahahaahahhaahhahaahahhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahahaahahahahaahahhaahahhahahahahahahahahahahaahahahahahhaahhahahahahahahahahahahahahahah
Oct 26 2010 8:03PM
0 0
profile picture
pghjibber
Posts: 1298 - Karma: 329
rumor has it that some/if not all the money they make off this is going to charitable organizations

and if you actual read the armada patent application, you would be suprised how detailed they were with the exact dimensions, the percentage of sidecut, where the rocker begins to bend, etc.

hold off judgment until you get your facts straight
Oct 26 2010 8:07PM
0 0
profile picture
Newschool_Pope
Posts: 2473 - Karma: 267
now its time for armada and rossi to make a statement.
Oct 26 2010 8:08PM
0 0
All times are Eastern (-5)