Member of the Month

KilaTsunami
October, 2024

Online

Welcome to the Newschoolers forums! You may read the forums as a guest, however you must be a registered member to post. Register to become a member today!

Hyper Realist Painting

profile picture
Mr_Papageorgio
Posts: 1271 - Karma: 117

never seen this before.  In one sense it's amazing but in another it gives me a headache trying to tell that it's been painted

http://www.recave.com/2010/07/amazing-hyper-realist-still-life-painters/?ref=nf

Oct 20 2010 5:15PM
0 0
profile picture
Vino
Posts: 2939 - Karma: 1,117

wait what?

Oct 20 2010 5:18PM
0 0
profile picture
TijmenDal
Posts: 4849 - Karma: 1,295
Huh? Is that seriously real? It might be one huge troll, because they look so damn real...I can hardly imagine it is in fact real. Or is it been made on the computer, as in pixel after pixel...?
Oct 20 2010 5:21PM
0 0
profile picture
1337
Posts: 31054 - Karma: 29,234
oh my impressive
Oct 20 2010 5:22PM
0 0
profile picture
.Max.
Posts: 2930 - Karma: 701
wow.
Oct 20 2010 10:40PM
0 0
profile picture
skithesprings
Posts: 9086 - Karma: 1,349
wait... what is... how do they... i don't even...
Oct 20 2010 10:49PM
0 0
profile picture
Mr_Papageorgio
Posts: 1271 - Karma: 117
exactly. I'm more confused than impressed. and i'm incredibly impressed
Oct 20 2010 11:08PM
0 0
profile picture
Ben.
Posts: 21463 - Karma: 683
x2
Oct 20 2010 11:12PM
0 0
profile picture
canterbury
Posts: 2382 - Karma: 55
that's insane
Oct 21 2010 8:29AM
0 0
profile picture
michelle
Posts: 6290 - Karma: 428
WHAT!
Oct 21 2010 8:37AM
0 0
profile picture
TWoods
Posts: 10014 - Karma: 8,386
It's real for sure. I've seen Eric Christensen originals.

It's impressive for sure, but want to know how they do it?

They take a photograph, grid it off, draw it based on the grid on the canvas, and then copy the photo. That's why it looks like a photo - that depth of field is a photographic quality. It's really impressive for sure. The realistic nature of the paintings ultimately comes from a very careful observation of color.
Oct 21 2010 10:08AM
0 0
profile picture
Jordan
Posts: 4079 - Karma: 2,122
LOL

The artwork is baller - but look at the comments. Follow Adrian and Alexander (the first poster)

It turns epic.
Oct 21 2010 10:20AM
0 0
profile picture
Blandct
Posts: 1858 - Karma: 37
WOW the comments are fucking hilarious....

"So I guess whatever you produce you can justify it’s worth and existence through a thesaurus of cosmic significance. Exponentially bullshitting your way through life. Go fuck yourself."

referring to that alexander guy...
Oct 21 2010 12:32PM
0 0
profile picture
snowking249
Posts: 1452 - Karma: 34
can someone embed? it wont let me open the link at school
Oct 21 2010 2:40PM
0 0
profile picture
Ethan.G
Posts: 1166 - Karma: 465
this for sure
Oct 21 2010 2:57PM
0 0
profile picture
Black-Bandanna
Posts: 6680 - Karma: 1,603
Chuck Close FTW

The grandfather of photo realism.
Oct 21 2010 3:17PM
0 0
profile picture
NL_twoplank
Posts: 118 - Karma: 40
what!

that looks so real , it would be so hard to draw the glass and the reflection,

wow, dose pictures really blew me out
Oct 21 2010 4:17PM
0 0
profile picture
Relish_man
Posts: 5386 - Karma: 551
purple drank spotted in pic no.2
Oct 22 2010 12:11AM
0 0
profile picture
Big_Spence
Posts: 16177 - Karma: 4,352
yeah, for sure. ;)
Oct 22 2010 12:27PM
0 0
profile picture
*Nickdel*
Posts: 2264 - Karma: 956
My thoughts exactly
Oct 22 2010 1:12PM
0 0
profile picture
FUUUCK
Posts: 18426 - Karma: 4,888
ooooooowwww my head
Oct 22 2010 5:50PM
0 0
profile picture
Brock.
Posts: 5698 - Karma: 1,332
Im not really a fan of hyper-realism. I mean, I respect the preparation and time that artists put into works like this but It just isn't a real art form from my perspective. You essentially just copy the photograph colour to colour, rather than expressing some kind of emotion or taking ideas or objects and turning its preconceived notion into something new, which defines art in my mind.
Oct 22 2010 9:19PM
0 0
profile picture
TWoods
Posts: 10014 - Karma: 8,386
agreed. It's cool once or twice, but it kinda bores me.
Oct 22 2010 11:58PM
0 0
profile picture
Ben.
Posts: 21463 - Karma: 683
im not sure i really consider it "art" in the literal sense. since it is really just copying. its more just the incredible time/workmanship that goes into it
Oct 23 2010 12:45AM
0 0
profile picture
steezenskis
Posts: 1044 - Karma: 31
i saw that on there. funny shit
Oct 23 2010 10:20PM
0 0
profile picture
fsscott
Posts: 4684 - Karma: 114
I have one like these in my house.
Oct 23 2010 10:50PM
0 0
profile picture
TWoods
Posts: 10014 - Karma: 8,386
exactly. I mean - in it's broadest sense you can call the doing of the work itself an art, rather than the work produced, which like you said is really just observation and copying... but I really don't get interested in art unless there's some sort of conscious decision making going on.

I don't deny the skill, but it's just not very exciting to me.

Oct 26 2010 6:16PM
0 0
profile picture
ski-swagga
Posts: 5276 - Karma: 219
insane.
Oct 26 2010 6:26PM
0 0
profile picture
J-Evs
Posts: 6387 - Karma: 1,615
how the fuck........
Oct 26 2010 6:28PM
0 0
profile picture
special-J
Posts: 1572 - Karma: 4,477
o_0
the newspaper one blows my mind
Oct 26 2010 8:14PM
0 0
All times are Eastern (-5)