5'10" 140 lbs....looking to ride SMALL planks

Posts: 24730 - Karma: 29,998

Karma: 29,998

Posts: 24730

@th1337

I'm assuming you inline, based on your NS name.

Don't think that going small on skis is going to replicate the feeling. Go a bit longer if you can. Honestly, in the end you'll be able to get more out of them.

Aug 21 2010 12:07AM

0 0

Posts: 11552 - Karma: 2,550

Karma: 2,550

Posts: 11552

Crazy Fool

i am 5' 8" and i'm getting 177 park skis and 185 powder skis. dont try to go so damn short. it looks dumb. (granted, im a pretty strong skier (not bragging), started at 2, and raced, so im used to long skis)

Aug 21 2010 12:37AM

0 0

Posts: 24730 - Karma: 29,998

Karma: 29,998

Posts: 24730

@th1337

Yeah. Rockered skis looked pretty dumb for a minute too back when they first hit the slopes, but look at what's happened now.

I get what you were saying, but who gives a shit what something looks like.

Aug 21 2010 12:55AM

0 0

Posts: 11552 - Karma: 2,550

Karma: 2,550

Posts: 11552

Crazy Fool

i guess i was trying to say it doesnt work, the advantages are small, and the disadvantages are huge. AND it looks dumb.

Aug 21 2010 12:56AM

0 0

eddy9

Posts: 383 - Karma: 216

Karma: 216

Posts: 383

Loner

Get some proper sized skis

Aug 21 2010 2:32AM

0 0

Posts: 95 - Karma: 11

Karma: 11

Posts: 95

Wannabe

Thanks for the replies... I got the answers I was expecting hahaha...

And yes, I do rollerblade, but I am not trying to replicate the feeling....trying to do something else. hehe

Any chance someone can elaborate on the disadvantages of 145-150 cm skis? I mean like the technical reason why I shouldn't do it. Looks don't matter, I just don't wanna be edging out all over the place and have my skis break from doing jumps.

(btw, I am a park skier and I don't think I'll be hitting jumps bigger than 35-40 feet)

Thanks again!

Aug 21 2010 8:53AM

0 0

amo

Posts: 6709 - Karma: 1,248

Karma: 1,248

Posts: 6709

No Life

honestly if you looking 145-150 they will be youth skis and i wouldnt be surprised if they straight up fell apart on you. they are made for riders around or less than 100 lbs.

grow balls and get some 170+

Aug 21 2010 10:03AM

0 0

BerGNARdo

Posts: 406 - Karma: 44

Karma: 44

Posts: 406

Ridiculous

yeah I think the biggest problem would be durability. the forces put onto the skis from a 100 lb person would be exponentially less than someone your size.

also there isn't enough surface area to support you carving or landing big jumps. bigger skis may be a bit heavier and harder to spin with but it's much easier to learn how to do that than how to land on short, unstable skis.

also, generally longer=faster.

I would recommend mid 160's to low 170's if you want short skis. im an inch shorter than you and ride 181 park skis. last year a rode 166's and they were right on the verge of being unusable on 40+ foot jumps cause they're so unstable.

Aug 21 2010 4:29PM

0 0

RudyGarmisch

Posts: 25443 - Karma: 13,844

Karma: 13,844

Posts: 25443

@th1337

You'll be fine, have fun on those skiblades.

Aug 21 2010 5:04PM

0 0

chardi

Posts: 5040 - Karma: 59

Karma: 59

Posts: 5040

No Life

this. buy these.

afterbang shorty?

Aug 21 2010 5:27PM

0 0

Posts: 95 - Karma: 11

Karma: 11

Posts: 95

Wannabe

Yeah I might buy the guys invaders, loookin into that....but tbh I'm not trying to be a wimp and go for smaller skis, but regardless, how big a deal would it be to ride 145's like that's 10 cm off a 155, and I hear that 155's plenty fine..? Aren't a lot of the new youth skiis built with the exact same technology as the adult skis too?

Like you guys say the skiis will fall apart and stuff, but can a 145 cm ski really be THAT unsturdy, if you guys say so and heckle me one more time I'll take your words for it...but please, I'd like to know seriously, am I going to break/snap/spin/edge out on 145cm skis? I'm sure I could learn to accomidate for this.'

Thanks dudes, peace!

Aug 22 2010 1:54AM

0 0

Posts: 95 - Karma: 11

Karma: 11

Posts: 95

Wannabe

Better question... like what if I opted for the 155...mayyybe even the 144 of this skii...

http://lineskis.com/skis/ep-pro-shorty

I mean it seems like those would offer me the most control/stability and I don't plan to go back country cliff jumping or any serious powder shredding anways, strictly street riding.

Aug 22 2010 2:03AM

0 0

Mr_pretzel

Posts: 4616 - Karma: 1,290

Karma: 1,290

Posts: 4616

No Life

Why would you ever go shorter than a ski you have owned before.

Aug 22 2010 2:09AM

0 0

Posts: 24730 - Karma: 29,998

Karma: 29,998

Posts: 24730

@th1337

The weight that a 145cm pair of skis does not quite stack up to that of a longer ski, where the stresses are displaced across a longer surface. It simply comes down to leverage.

You're more likely to break a tip, or snap a core, or delam a tip under the stress in a 145cm ski than you would in something that was 170cm. It would be a massive difference.

Think about it this way... I weigh 145ish, and I have broken a few pairs of 180+ length skis in my life... all different makes and models and widths. never the same ski twice.

You ride anything long enough, or hard enough, it will break... so the question is, do you want to risk spending your money on a pair of skis that's more susceptible to breaking? or do you want to spend the same money, or maybe a little more, on the correct length for you that will give you a more durable ski, and allow you more stability, response, performance, etc?

Aug 22 2010 3:07AM

0 0

bustinthejus

Posts: 2419 - Karma: 74

Karma: 74

Posts: 2419

Addict

145s are 10 cm off a 155 yes, but that is definitely NOT plenty fine... I'm 5'6/5'7 and I'm planning on buying 173s - you being 5'10 I would think would need atleast high 170s, if not 180s. Plus, centre mounting twin tips makes them run shorter than regular skis. I guess a lot of it is personal preference, but I was riding skis that came up to about my nose (which is about how long NORMAL skis should be, but too short for twin tips), and I absolutely hated it. I always felt off balance, riding switch felt funny, and it just wasn't a good experience.

Aug 22 2010 3:18AM

0 0

PaleCelery

Posts: 7228 - Karma: 609

Karma: 609

Posts: 7228

Crazy Fool

why the hell would you buy ep pro's in 145. And then you say that they'll offer stability? You really are fucking stupid.

Get a pair of 170's and quit being a little bitch.

Aug 22 2010 3:42AM

0 0

Posts: 95 - Karma: 11

Karma: 11

Posts: 95

Wannabe

Thank you, finally a neutral reply filled with more knowledge than cockyness... hahaha (well, there's been like you and like two or three other cool dudes... haha)

Look I intend to ride, street rails, skateparks and jibs and shit on skis in general... (Like I'm not trying to do huge stunts of epic proportions...I'm looking into street rails and I think it just makes perfect sense not to use 178-180ish skis, how could those possibly be so much better?

I can understand the fact that they will give under pressure.... and that's probably where the difference is made, but a season of shredding street spots should probably destroy any good pair of skis anyways.

It seems like it's cheaper to buy smaller skis and I'd much rather buy a new pair of smaller skis every season as apposed to a large pair every other season or less.

And I'm not too concerned if shit starts breaking after a season and a bit...TBH I'm used to buying new gear always, shit happens, it's meant to be shredded.

Thanks for the input guys, some of you have really helped me in opening my opinion on this, but I am still trying to get onto some tiny planks. I'll bump this so more people can tell me to grow some more balls and tell me to be a man... hahahah

However it seems I got all the answers I was looking for, thanks bustinthejus, DingoSean, berGNARdo. I will be back in the winter with edits, and I will be on short skis!!

Aug 22 2010 10:22AM

0 0

Posts: 11552 - Karma: 2,550

Karma: 2,550

Posts: 11552

Crazy Fool

getting any ski in a 145 for anyone other than a child is dumb. added to the lessend durability is a higher chance that you could wheel out on landings, or pretty much any other time you get in the back seat. plus EP Pros are rockered. i am 5' 8" and have been thinking of buying a pair in 185. dont do ultra short. and why do you want really short skis?

Aug 22 2010 10:27AM

0 0

Posts: 24730 - Karma: 29,998

Karma: 29,998

Posts: 24730

@th1337

I can sorta understand it, as I have a pair of 165 park skis that I use specifically to do stupid shit on.

Still. Seems kinda silly to me as well.

Aug 22 2010 10:30AM

0 0

Posts: 95 - Karma: 11

Karma: 11

Posts: 95

Wannabe

I am gunna be riding stuff that takes a lot less impact and shock on the skis, like handrails, and handicap rails and stuff... I don't wanna say it, but I need something LIKE a snowblade...just not as gay and flimsy.... I know I know, small skis aren't the most supportive either, but come on...there's no way I am gunna ride snowblades (no disrespect at all, I'm just not into it)

I am now leaning towards the Icelantic scout...it's a 143 and I hear they are constructed so well that you wouldn't even be able to tell the ski was so short.

I am not going to buy anything without being sure it'll do the job well though... I mean I still have my Volkl Ledges, which are still 162s, but if those icelantic planks hold up as well as they've been hyped, I'd like to look into that!

Aug 22 2010 10:37AM

0 0

a_pla5tic_bag

Posts: 9223 - Karma: 5,435

Karma: 5,435

Posts: 9223

Crazy Fool

What exactly are you trying to do anyway? I've been skating for like 8 or 9 years now.

Aug 22 2010 10:53AM

0 0

Posts: 95 - Karma: 11

Karma: 11

Posts: 95

Wannabe

And for all the haters....

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SYDAauh2vkQ&feature=related

Keep on hating.

Aug 22 2010 12:29PM

0 0

Balto

Posts: 25985 - Karma: 4,403

Karma: 4,403

Posts: 25985

@th1337

exactly, if it works it works, it shouldnt matter what something looks like, as long as it gets the person down the hill while having fun, isn't that what skiing is all about?

Aug 22 2010 12:31PM

0 0

Posts: 95 - Karma: 11

Karma: 11

Posts: 95

Wannabe

Thank you, I was more or less trying to figure out if my idea would work consistent enough to have fun without worrying much about the skis falling apart or giving way underneath me.... It seems that the Icelantic Scout is exactly what I was looking for.

Anyone else who has something constructive to say, by all means, spill the beans, I am more than glad to hear a variety of replies. Thanks again!

Aug 22 2010 12:59PM

0 0

Posts: 24730 - Karma: 29,998

Karma: 29,998

Posts: 24730

@th1337

Yeah. I mean, are they going to be the most sturdy in that size? nah... but are they just going to crumble under your immense weight of 140lbs, and your incredible height leverage of 5'10?

You'll be fine dude. Youll have fun, and you'll spin really fast.

Aug 22 2010 8:09PM

0 0

Piste.Off

Posts: 11586 - Karma: 1,860

Karma: 1,860

Posts: 11586

Crazy Fool

you say you want to do rails? get some 170s and center mount them. they will be 10x better then any 140-150 cm ski

Aug 22 2010 8:17PM

0 0

WHO_DAT

Posts: 403 - Karma: 24

Karma: 24

Posts: 403

Ridiculous

Is this dude for real?

I'm a 5'4" chick and I ride 171 park skis and 176 powder skis.

Reasons why you shouldn't be on short skis:
Not only are short skis going to have NO flex for jibbing, they are going to be thinner making it easier to catch an edge (believe it or not) and make it harder to turn. They are also going to be a lot easier to break. A foot of your size is not meant to be mounted on a ski of that size. The pressure points are going to be at the completely wrong spots and you're going to look like a hippo on ice skates. Lastly, the longer the ski, the more balance you're going to have when you're actually on a rail. I realize you're a roller bladder, but this is a different animal.

Get a 170 and actually ski like a man, or get snollerblades, or even a snowboard for all I care. Just don't be nutsuck and buy little skis like a cluck.

Aug 22 2010 11:21PM

0 0

Posts: 95 - Karma: 11

Karma: 11

Posts: 95

Wannabe

So some of you really think this is gay eh??

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5tCdrJYiJh4

I'm almost positive it would be a lot less "gay" with skis that are 50cm longer and poles... lol.

It's okay, haters keep hating, I'll be back in the winter, maybe even sooner with pics and vids, haha.

Aug 23 2010 12:31AM

0 0

Posts: 11552 - Karma: 2,550

Karma: 2,550

Posts: 11552

Crazy Fool

yea thats a joke. he did it for fun one day just to show what he could do. and yes, its pretty cool, but no, skiing on skis longer than skis e'dollo skied on for one day does not make you cooler than e'dollo.

i'm not trying to hate, just saying i think you would find that if you tried skis that were a normal size you would be much happier. there is a reason that people dont ski on ski blades all the time.

Aug 23 2010 12:35AM

0 0

Mr_pretzel

Posts: 4616 - Karma: 1,290

Karma: 1,290

Posts: 4616

No Life

Henriks like 5.5 and he skis on 176 skis.

Just get some 145cm skis and stop annoying us.

Aug 23 2010 12:43AM

0 0

arandomname

Posts: 1989 - Karma: 18

Karma: 18

Posts: 1989

Insane

Even if the people are being dicks about it, they are telling you the truth. Longer skis will always be more beneficial. And I don't know what you're talking about with the skis and poles, but either way, just get longer skis, you'll be happier in the long run. I'm you're height, and I'll be riding 181s. I'm surprised people are even suggesting 170s, usually when someone's 5'9", they suggest at 180s or so.

Aug 23 2010 1:12AM

0 0

Yung_Gnarley

Posts: 9095 - Karma: 3,073

Karma: 3,073

Posts: 9095

Crazy Fool

Question: Do you care if everyone you ski by laughs their ass off at you?

Aug 23 2010 2:40AM

0 0

Posts: 24730 - Karma: 29,998

Karma: 29,998

Posts: 24730

@th1337

alright guys... stop harrassing him....

least he's not going to spend that much money... 145cm skis are cheap and on sale everywhere. so whatever.

Aug 23 2010 3:25AM

0 0

MRoden

Posts: 753 - Karma: 211

Karma: 211

Posts: 753

Ridiculous

Everyone is saying get longer skis for one reason basically. The more ski ifront and behind you have over a rail the easier it is to balance. Kinda like a counter weight in a sense to help balance yourself out. I rode 155cm skis 2 seasons ago when I was built basically how you are now. Im 6'2 now and tried riding those same skis on urban this year. Hitting the trannys and spinning on and off rails is a lot harder than I thought with shorter skis compared to my 181cm skis. Thats just my personal experience with them. You'll defiantly have a lot more give to the skis the longer they are like most people are saying and will flex a lot easier. Also the longer the ski for urban the less room there is for error to get onto the rail with more ski to work with. If you're wondering if some skis with be harder to spin the swing weight Armadas got some skis that are amazingly easy to throw around. Not much effort to spin them due to the light swing weight even at longer lengths. Those are just my opinions. If you're still thinking shorter look at the afterbang shorty in 144cm or mastermind in 147cm. Hope that helps

Aug 23 2010 4:10AM

0 0

MRoden

Posts: 753 - Karma: 211

Karma: 211

Posts: 753

Ridiculous

Everyone is saying get longer skis for one reason basically. The more ski ifront and behind you have over a rail the easier it is to balance. Kinda like a counter weight in a sense to help balance yourself out. I rode 155cm skis 2 seasons ago when I was built basically how you are now. Im 6'2 now and tried riding those same skis on urban this year. Hitting the trannys and spinning on and off rails is a lot harder than I thought with shorter skis compared to my 181cm skis. Thats just my personal experience with them. You'll defiantly have a lot more give to the skis the longer they are like most people are saying and will flex a lot easier. Also the longer the ski for urban the less room there is for error to get onto the rail with more ski to work with. If you're wondering if some skis with be harder to spin the swing weight Armadas got some skis that are amazingly easy to throw around. Not much effort to spin them due to the light swing weight even at longer lengths. Those are just my opinions. If you're still thinking shorter look at the afterbang shorty in 144cm or mastermind in 147cm. Hope that helps

Aug 23 2010 4:12AM

0 0

Posts: 95 - Karma: 11

Karma: 11

Posts: 95

Wannabe

Thanks for the replies.

I am probably going to either stick with my 162cm volkls or I might buy Steep.' s invaders. They're 151.

...I never said I will be cooler Henrik either, but I mean people think snowblades are gay, but Henrik stomps everything in them.

...I am not trying to be a 'sissy' and opt out for "easier" gear...If I was, I'd be looking for giant skiis like everyone else. I also do not give two fucks what I look like either. Talk all the shit you'd like....but 9/10 ski kids probably look like garbage bag wearing retards anyways.

I am trying to make skiing more maneuverable, and a lot more stylish for myself.... I have skied one season and it's just too basic for me to enjoy the way it is. I understand it is a completely different sport from what I am trying to get at.....but fuck anything else....I am an innovator and I will ski like I rollerblade... so everyone can fuck off while I throw fakie 5's, 7's, grinds, disasters, and some of the more technical grinds you will ever see on skiis, ever.

Please don't take this as me being cocky either.... But I laugh at you haters hating so hard.

I am done justifying myself.... hate harder, see yu in the winter!

Aug 23 2010 8:05AM

0 0

DUKES

Posts: 5150 - Karma: 691

Karma: 691

Posts: 5150

No Life

the smaller the ski = smaller the penis

Aug 23 2010 9:27AM

0 0

WHO_DAT

Posts: 403 - Karma: 24

Karma: 24

Posts: 403

Ridiculous

DUDE WE'RE NOT HATING, we're telling you how it is. Did you not read what I wrote? A foot of your size is not meant to be on a ski of that size. It won't work for so many reasons. It will ride funny which will make you look funny.

If you want to change skiing that much then maybe you need to find a different sport. Clearly this one isn't getting you off. If you're trying to be that "different", go back to high school. We are real skiers on this sight will legitimate opinions. We know what we're talking about. So if you want some kind of bullshit opinion that is going to support your stupid idea go ask your parents. Whether you like it or not, short skiers aren't going to make your "style" any better. You need to get the roller blade image out of your head, or stick to roller blading only.

Aug 23 2010 11:10AM

0 0

Posts: 24730 - Karma: 29,998

Karma: 29,998

Posts: 24730

@th1337

Why do you care so passionately? If the kid wants to ride on short skis, let him ride on short skis.

He'll be fine. He'll just have a harder time landing, and actually skiing n'shit. Whatever dude...

Either way. the "it looks stupid" is a pretty awful way to say anyone here has 'legitimate opinions' Just saying...

Aug 23 2010 12:27PM

0 0

WHO_DAT

Posts: 403 - Karma: 24

Karma: 24

Posts: 403

Ridiculous

I don't care so passionately. It bothers me that he asks for our opinion and when he doesn't like our opinion he calls it hating when there's more than just "it looks stupid" behind it. If someone can't handle people not agreeing with them they shouldn't ask for opinions in the first place. Clearly he's going to do it anyway.

Aug 23 2010 12:38PM

0 0