Member of the Month

partyandBS
December, 2024

Online

Welcome to the Newschoolers forums! You may read the forums as a guest, however you must be a registered member to post. Register to become a member today!

CALL OUT!! Shreddysaurus Vs. Utard

profile picture
Shreddysaurus
Posts: 2120 - Karma: 59
Intelligent responses only.


Utard, You pick the subject.



Ready,



Set,




DEBATE!!!!!
Aug 11 2010 3:12PM
0 0
profile picture
1337
Posts: 31061 - Karma: 29,366
WHY DON'T WE DO THIS MORE OFTEN
NS DEBATE TEAMS OMG
I LOVE IT
Aug 11 2010 3:13PM
0 0
profile picture
blong131
Posts: 2193 - Karma: 59

Aug 11 2010 3:13PM
0 0
profile picture
Darth_Veeder
Posts: 1054 - Karma: -26
EFFF YEAH!!! I am so pumped for this.
Aug 11 2010 3:15PM
0 0
profile picture
H8CH
Posts: 2709 - Karma: 218

What came first - the chicken or the egg....

GO!

Aug 11 2010 3:16PM
0 0
profile picture
Shreddysaurus
Posts: 2120 - Karma: 59
WHY DONT WE PICK TEAMS NOW!!
Aug 11 2010 3:16PM
0 0
profile picture
Shreddysaurus
Posts: 2120 - Karma: 59
The Farmer.
Aug 11 2010 3:17PM
0 0
profile picture
No_Dub
Posts: 3357 - Karma: 294
can i be all time attacker?
Aug 11 2010 3:17PM
0 0
profile picture
1337
Posts: 31061 - Karma: 29,366
http://www.littleabout.com/Science/chicken-or-egg,98133.html

chicken.

I WIN WOOHOO
Aug 11 2010 3:24PM
0 0
profile picture
Utard
Posts: 2132 - Karma: 305
Ok haha:

Resolved: The United States federal government should substantially reduce its military and/or police presence in one or more of the following: South Korea, Japan, Afghanistan, Kuwait, Iraq, Turkey.
Aug 11 2010 3:28PM
0 0
profile picture
Schlop
Posts: 3640 - Karma: 24
"Logically in layman terms, the chicken came first because if the egg came first you need something to hatch it. Where as if the chicken came first it can give eggs and the process continues."

Where did the chicken come from? Worst scientific explanation EVER
Aug 11 2010 3:32PM
0 0
profile picture
1337
Posts: 31061 - Karma: 29,366
yea, what about dinosaur eggs?

thats the thing with debate teams, you might get a side that you don't stand for or believe in but you can still win with proof.
Aug 11 2010 3:32PM
0 0
profile picture
Benson23
Posts: 1713 - Karma: 15
summer nsg.... still continues to amuse me.
Aug 11 2010 3:34PM
0 0
profile picture
Shreddysaurus
Posts: 2120 - Karma: 59
pass. Politics dont involve logic.
Aug 11 2010 3:36PM
0 0
profile picture
Darth_Veeder
Posts: 1054 - Karma: -26
NOOOO!!!! You said he chose the topic, wtf bro? Shreddysaurus forfeits!!!!
Aug 11 2010 3:37PM
0 0
profile picture
Utard
Posts: 2132 - Karma: 305
The resolution doesn't specify whether it is referring to chicken eggs or not. Seeing that the institution of "egg" has been around since well before the dinosaurs I think it is safe to say that the egg came first.

Unless of course, "chicken" really means: One who is timid or afraid. In that case seeing that the survival instinct of flight from danger has been around since the earliest forms of life, I would say the chicken came first.
Aug 11 2010 3:39PM
0 0
profile picture
Shreddysaurus
Posts: 2120 - Karma: 59
you cant have intelligent answers about politics. Its impossible. Making the question invalid. :)
Aug 11 2010 3:39PM
0 0
profile picture
Darth_Veeder
Posts: 1054 - Karma: -26
here, I will give you some intelligent anwers to this resolution

http://scfi.wikispaces.com/2010+Files
Aug 11 2010 3:41PM
0 0
profile picture
Utard
Posts: 2132 - Karma: 305
I'd beg to differ, but in all honesty political topics do have a reasonable amount of reciprocity making them some of the more evenly matched ones.
Aug 11 2010 3:42PM
0 0
profile picture
Shreddysaurus
Posts: 2120 - Karma: 59
But where did the egg come from?
Aug 11 2010 3:44PM
0 0
profile picture
Utard
Posts: 2132 - Karma: 305
I'm alluding to the institution of egg being around before the chicken species rather than the actual physical chicken egg. The precursors to dinosaurs were laying eggs and such.
Aug 11 2010 3:47PM
0 0
profile picture
thugaim
Posts: 2181 - Karma: 33
This thread is dildos.
Aug 11 2010 3:48PM
0 0
profile picture
Darth_Veeder
Posts: 1054 - Karma: -26
you cant win by asking questions, you must be advocating something, so that the chicken came first.
Aug 11 2010 3:51PM
0 0
profile picture
Shreddysaurus
Posts: 2120 - Karma: 59
so "egg" came before "chicken". Thats unfair.

NEXT!!
Aug 11 2010 3:51PM
0 0
profile picture
Darth_Veeder
Posts: 1054 - Karma: -26
there are no standards to vote for you on this
1. ground, he provides plenty of ground, you could of argued the definition of chicken as being afraid unrationally.
2. fairness, you provided no definintion of egg so he did, if you didnt, he could of chosen any definitin he wanted to, and he did
3. dont vote for this becuase it is unwarrented
Aug 11 2010 3:53PM
0 0
profile picture
FBGM
Posts: 8184 - Karma: 2,677
THE CHICKEN CAME FIRST GOD DAMMIT, EVOLUTION!
Aug 11 2010 3:54PM
0 0
profile picture
*TURBONERD*
Posts: 15084 - Karma: 9,181
you and your sig are both dildoes
Aug 11 2010 3:57PM
0 0
profile picture
Shreddysaurus
Posts: 2120 - Karma: 59
I didnt even ask the question fool. Its not my fault the question was vague.

AND WHERE DID ALL THESE RULES COME FROM???? GROUND? FAIRNESS? WTF YOU TALKIN BOUT KID?
Aug 11 2010 3:57PM
0 0
profile picture
Utard
Posts: 2132 - Karma: 305
Haha take it up with the person who came up with the resolution
Aug 11 2010 3:58PM
0 0
profile picture
Darth_Veeder
Posts: 1054 - Karma: -26
these aren't rules, these are standards that seem like good ones that people would enjoy when debating, you talked about it being unfair, I said it was fair, why would it be unfair? because it takes away your ground of arguing.
Aug 11 2010 4:00PM
0 0
profile picture
Blurst
Posts: 13577 - Karma: 10,169
I HEARD THAT THE CHICKEN DIED AND WAS REINCARNATED AS AN EGG AND THEN HATCHED TWINS AND THEY HAD NOOKIE AND MADE THE NEXT EGG AND THE PROCESS WAS TIGHT
Aug 11 2010 4:03PM
0 0
profile picture
FBGM
Posts: 8184 - Karma: 2,677
they came from the water.
Aug 11 2010 4:03PM
0 0
profile picture
Utard
Posts: 2132 - Karma: 305
What am I supposed to do haha this topic has been argued by virtually every person in America I'm just trying to think of something not everybody has an automatic answer for
Aug 11 2010 4:06PM
0 0
profile picture
Sir.Steezealot
Posts: 1156 - Karma: 677
Seems logical enough for me
Aug 11 2010 4:07PM
0 0
profile picture
Shreddysaurus
Posts: 2120 - Karma: 59
Most of the topics do. As for the troops question, honestly I dont know enough to make a valid arguement. The way my ignorant brain looks at it is kill terrorists, dont police other countries, and protect china.
Aug 11 2010 4:08PM
0 0
profile picture
Shreddysaurus
Posts: 2120 - Karma: 59
we dont have troops in turkey. We have allies in turkey. Definitely not korea. The whole world needs to watch its hat. Japan has troops? Afghanistan, Kuwait, Iraq are all the same place so i would have to say we should get our troops out of there as long as we are done spraying for terrorists.
Aug 11 2010 4:14PM
0 0
profile picture
Utard
Posts: 2132 - Karma: 305
Yeah haha that's why i like these kind of topics though because there's so many possibilities that the debate could evolve into. Like it could turn into an argument about biopower, securitization, nuclear arms theory etc.
Aug 11 2010 4:14PM
0 0
profile picture
Shreddysaurus
Posts: 2120 - Karma: 59
how do you do that? 2 seconds that time.

We haz a wizard over here
Aug 11 2010 4:16PM
0 0
profile picture
FBGM
Posts: 8184 - Karma: 2,677
everything came from the water.
Aug 11 2010 4:19PM
0 0
profile picture
Darth_Veeder
Posts: 1054 - Karma: -26
we do have troops in all of those places, trust me, thats why it is a big topic, just trust us, there is.
Aug 11 2010 4:20PM
0 0
profile picture
FBGM
Posts: 8184 - Karma: 2,677
well obviously a chicken didn't just walk out of the water as a chicken, it evolved into a chicken over time. where would the eggs have come from without the chicken?
Aug 11 2010 4:22PM
0 0
profile picture
Darth_Veeder
Posts: 1054 - Karma: -26
genetic mutation that formed in the chromosomes that were combined from parents.
Aug 11 2010 4:23PM
0 0
profile picture
H8CH
Posts: 2709 - Karma: 218

having started this - i feel i should fuel the fire some more and leave this here...

 http://www.physorg.com/news2313.html
Aug 11 2010 4:27PM
0 0
profile picture
scormier2
Posts: 124 - Karma: 14
You make a thread specifically to call him out, tell him he can pick the topic, then when he picks one you know little about you bitch out?
Aug 11 2010 4:57PM
0 0
profile picture
Shreddysaurus
Posts: 2120 - Karma: 59
I wasnt saying we dont have troops in those places. It was sarcasm to convey how I felt the importance of our troops lays in each of the countries. I said that we didnt have troops in turkey. I was wrong, I misread.

Out of all the countries we should have less troops in Japan. There is simply no need for a significant presence of our armed forces there.

NO ONE including canada should overlook north korea, They hate everything except power.

The rest fall into the war on terror, and while less troops are needed ,overall the prevalence of terror in the remaining countries exceeds the rest, therefore leaving troops in those countries would make more sence.
Aug 11 2010 5:09PM
0 0
profile picture
Shreddysaurus
Posts: 2120 - Karma: 59
o















rly?
Aug 11 2010 5:18PM
0 0
All times are Eastern (-5)