2009 Saga sizes vs 2010 Saga sizes

This year's is bigger...

im around 5'5 and 5'6.  i have this years medium jacket and pants.

I tried on my friends large 2010 saga jacket and the only part that didnt fit me was the sleeves.  I bought a medium because the sleeves were at a length that was comfortable.  This may just be my build but all in all the medium goes around half way down between my waist and knees.

Pants:  Again since im not the tallest guy around, i had to get suspenders to hold them up at a comfortable length without a belt.  The hip adjustments are really awesome and i know il be using these pants as i grow (im 17).  Prob the baggiest snowpants i have brought so far.

Warning: just so you know, the fabric this year isnt that great.  It wears down pretty fast and cuts up real easy.  I skied 26 days this year and i have tons more cuts on the bottum of these pants then my last pair of pants which i used last year.  ive never had any other editions of saga so i cant compare.

hope this helps

 when i look my 2009 size large vs my friends 2010 size large, the 2010 is definitely a few inches taller.

I own pair of Saga pants & they seem to be made with different fabric. The Varcity pants fabric seem course & is fuzzing up already after little use. The Dranks on the other hand have a really nice fabric, repel water like mad & show not signs of any wear. BTW the XL pant are really long compared to last years I have heard.

This years saga is a good bit longer ide say prolly a good 5 inches....im 6'2" and the XL is to my top of my knee and last years jacket was only to my mid thigh.

does anyone have an xl jacket from last year (08/09) and a large from this year (09/10) and wants to take a picture to compare?

sorry to thread jack but what is the zipper lenght on last years saga size L

33 inches.