It looks like you are using an ad blocker. That's okay. Who doesn't? But without advertising revenue, we can't keep making this site awesome. Click the link below for instructions on disabling adblock.
Welcome to the Newschoolers forums! You may read the forums as a guest, however you must be a registered member to post.
Register to become a member today!
^ Im skiing them, I really like them, I hit kinda big jumps, boxes rails etc and done almost no damage in like a total of 30 days of skiing, just some tears on the sides. NOT MUCH
I have them, and their great, they feel a little heavy when your just holding them, but if you have any leg muscle whatsoever they will be fine. They also seem stiffer but after skiing for a while, they are really flexy, not good on groomers. And a heads up, they chip a TON, but thanks to the vertical sidewall, they are fine, I used them for a whole season, and they turned out great, only one big gash, and they said they will warranty that anyways. K2 is a huge company with great warranties, so get them and you will not be disappointed
oh yah! they are way too heavy for me personaly. but if you want to deal with a heavyer ski, then go for it. I find the flex is stiffer than the Ar6. I find the skis just completely retardedly made for park ( heavy, a bit too wide for me, sidewall) I would not buy these skis, you can get way better skis for less, its just not going to be a big name like K2... who is an over rated company in my opinion.
sorry for the rant but these skis are not worth it
The disorderly is flexy! Flexy and playfull, but not too much and you will still be able to do groomers very well.
And they are not heavier than other twintips out there, in fact i find them pretty light.. Don't know which skis you guys compare them to or what binding you got mounted though.