It looks like you are using an ad blocker. That's okay. Who doesn't? But without advertising revenue, we can't keep making this site awesome. Click the link below for instructions on disabling adblock.
Welcome to the Newschoolers forums! You may read the forums as a guest, however you must be a registered member to post.
Register to become a member today!
1) people in the background
2) lighting is balls
3) motion blur despite flash
4) distracting trash can - shows lack of effort in composition
5) the trick is gay
6) even if you like the gay ass trick, he is fucking it up (missed grab)
7) overall style is balls
8) clean the damn stairs next time and get rid of the ugly chain. - this shows a lack of effort and takes away from the photo. Urban shots where you can see the stairs work way better.
9) depth of field provides for the photo.
10) people are in the back ground.
2) why do you think hes using a flash?
3) where.
4) maybe he included it to give your eye a stopping point from the end of the rail.
5) hater
6) true
7) pretty specific on this one.
8) subjective
9) hah what?
I never said either of those photos was 'sick'
this lame nuts said the shit he posted was.
Those photos were from 2006, about 3 and a half years ago, Just taken as snap shots of a rail we hit.
1) Hard to have a background when its fucking night time and dark out.
2) I know right, taking a photo with an on camera flash is fucking great, or just using a street lamp as in the second shot.
3) congradufuckinglations, thats not me in the photo
4) HA! don't make shit up.
5) The difference in what was standard on urban rails in 2006 and 2009/2010 is very different.
2) I have no idea why he is using a flash since he obviously has no idea how to use one. The light from the flash sucks balls.
3) on the skier, the only thing that is moving, look at the face.
4) No he didn't, you know that. And the end of the rail is a stoping point in its own fucking right. Regardless of why its there, it takes away from the photo.
5) its true
6) yep
7) What did I say.
8) Not sure what I said either
9) it got cut off. The depth of field adds nothing to the photo.
Photography most certainly is an art form. And I happen to think this is shit. Obviously the numbnuts who posted it thinks differently, but then again he is WRONG.
totally agree. any of you guys who actually think this is sick are idiots. know what it takes to get a "dope" picture. it was shot with a fisheye and follows the rule of thirds. SICK PHOTO!!!!