X Games Aspen Day 1 Livestream

Member of the Month

partyandBS
December, 2024

Online

Welcome to the Newschoolers forums! You may read the forums as a guest, however you must be a registered member to post. Register to become a member today!

Mounting Dilema

profile picture
B.Pol
Posts: 1750 - Karma: 59

 I know there has been many threads about this, so I seachbarred it and didn't get a very definate answer.

So, I have the line spirals mounted with the Sth 12's. I mounted them at center, beacase the are symmetrical and all. But I went up in northern MI yesterday, and there was some decent pow in the trees, good for MI. I could definatly tell that I had a lot more back end to push down on just to get through it all. But then we went in the park and they spun like a dream. So I am wondering, what would you guys do if you had this situation? I thought about getting the schizo's and then I cried when I seen how much they were.

Spark notes: Would you re-mount them, even though there is not much pow in MI? Or would you just leave them and deal with it.

Thanks NS

Dec 19 2009 11:19AM
0 0
profile picture
Big_Spence
Posts: 16177 - Karma: 4,352
i hate you so much for this thread.
Dec 19 2009 11:23AM
0 0
profile picture
Commonwealth
Posts: 3729 - Karma: 11
Deal with it. At the end of the year, if you decide you would rather sacrifice swing weight for easier pow skiing, get them mounted a bit farther back.
Dec 19 2009 11:25AM
0 0
profile picture
B.Pol
Posts: 1750 - Karma: 59

Thanks?

And to the other guy, thats what I was thinking

Dec 19 2009 11:28AM
0 0
profile picture
Big_Spence
Posts: 16177 - Karma: 4,352
But honestly, what are you thinking?
Why would you even consider mounting a symmetrical park ski anywhere else but center? It would totally defeat the purpose.
Dec 19 2009 11:30AM
0 0
profile picture
Candy
Posts: 1052 - Karma: 176
Everybody just deals with it or buys pow skis too. That's just how it goes.
Dec 19 2009 11:36AM
0 0
profile picture
onearmwanderer
Posts: 1153 - Karma: 31
then tell him that in the first place, no need to be a dick about it in your first post.
Dec 19 2009 11:43AM
0 0
profile picture
Travapple.
Posts: 6787 - Karma: 88
anthems are a SYMMETRICAL PARK ski. i wouldnt even think about mounting them back. if you wanna ski pow, then get a pow ski.
Dec 19 2009 11:48AM
0 0
profile picture
Big_Spence
Posts: 16177 - Karma: 4,352
Dec 19 2009 11:49AM
0 0
profile picture
eheath
Posts: 61712 - Karma: 124,320
Please, don't be a goomba, keep them center mounted and learn how to ski.
Dec 19 2009 12:05PM
0 0
profile picture
nickyp
Posts: 5673 - Karma: 215

Dec 19 2009 12:07PM
0 0
profile picture
B.Pol
Posts: 1750 - Karma: 59

Thank you,

And to Big_spence, I am not an idiot I know they are a SYMMETRICAL PARK SKI, but I don't stay in the park everytime I go skiing. Unlike a lot of people on this site I like to challenge myself in other things except the park. Is that so crazy you have to be a dick about it. Also sorry I dont have the money to buy pow skis, because I actually pay for all my stuff, not saying any of you guys don't. I thought it was a legit question to ask but I guess not.

Dec 19 2009 12:14PM
0 0
profile picture
Travapple.
Posts: 6787 - Karma: 88
then why did you buy a park specific ski? there's plenty of all mountain skis you can choose from (i.e. chronic etc)
Dec 19 2009 12:21PM
0 0
profile picture
B.Pol
Posts: 1750 - Karma: 59
Because I got these for a sick deal, and wanted to get better in the park. And lets be honest they look pretty dope
Dec 19 2009 12:23PM
0 0
profile picture
nickyp
Posts: 5673 - Karma: 215
Then why did you buy the most specific park ski on the market? It's designed entirely for balance, not flotation or powder skiing.

Which suggests that you are, in fact, an idiot. If you don't spend all your time in the park, buy ANY OTHER ski apart from Line Spirals. Literally, any other ski. Even a thinner ski with a more progressive sidecut and tip-tail width differential would be better

Dec 19 2009 12:49PM
0 0
profile picture
Candy
Posts: 1052 - Karma: 176
Here's my experience with anthems, they were my only pair of skis last year while I was skiing at Park City and Snowbird. I actually skied some pretty deep stuff (12-30") in these and they are better than a lot of other park skis in the pow. They also did exactly what I needed them to do in the park. It can be done, and you won't even get as much pow as I skied in them. You're fine.

On a contradicting note, I decided to buy pow skis and park skis this year.
Dec 19 2009 12:56PM
0 0
profile picture
Steeze-On-Toast
Posts: 679 - Karma: 92
I agree ^^
Just go for more of an allround ski like the chronic or armada alpha, you can get away with mounting them a little back as they are more stable that way, and they arent symmetrical.

As for now, just put up with it, dont ruin all the days of park riding for the possible few where there is a chance of pow, just have fun with it.
Dec 19 2009 1:22PM
0 0
profile picture
Jibberino
Posts: 2089 - Karma: 1,346
It's simply not a legitimate question. They are park specific and symmetrical, so basically it would be like center mounting a slalom ski, completely useless. Idon't wanna be a dick about it, but it's so obvious, that askin the question is borderline retarded, sorry.

Also, pow in MI, really?
Dec 19 2009 2:03PM
0 0
profile picture
hotdog.garbage
Posts: 1854 - Karma: 10
so you bought inappropriate skis because they looked cool and were cheap?
Dec 19 2009 2:46PM
0 0
profile picture
Commonwealth
Posts: 3729 - Karma: 11
Fucking wrong.

What is with the elitist attitude on newschoolers? Everyone thinks they know fuck-all about skis and skiing, when in fact most of the shit spewed on here is just regurgitated from what is read in gear talk. You don't NEED pow skis to ski pow. You don't NEED park specific skis to ski park.

OP, do whatever the fuck you want.
Dec 19 2009 2:48PM
0 0
profile picture
wintersway
Posts: 5115 - Karma: 128
im just going to say that my last two days skiing were pow days in the woods on center mounted volkl walls. i wasnt even fully used to the skis yet since they are new this year. you should definitely be able to get used to the skis for powder pretty quickly if youre a decent skier.
Dec 19 2009 3:10PM
0 0
profile picture
Jibberino
Posts: 2089 - Karma: 1,346
No, it's not fucking wrong. I never said you NEEDED park skis to ski park, nor did i say that you NEED pow skis to ski pow. I said that the anthem is a PARK SPECIFIC SYMMETRICAL ski, which it is, and therefore mounting them anything other than center would, like someone else said, defeat the purpose of the ski. Of course you can ski pow on your center mounted symmetrical ski, i do it all the time, a pow ski would just be much better.

Since you seem to think that you know fuck-all about skis and skiing, perhaps you could enlighten us with something a bit more technical, or just well argued than the pile of spew you just presented us with?
Dec 19 2009 4:10PM
0 0
profile picture
Commonwealth
Posts: 3729 - Karma: 11
You're right, I'm sorry.

Denmark must have a different meaning for "completely useless" then, right?
Dec 19 2009 4:14PM
0 0
profile picture
Jibberino
Posts: 2089 - Karma: 1,346
I'll give you that completely useless was a strong term, but it doesn't change the fact that it would be pretty friggin stupid to re-mount your symmetrical park ski to ski powder on it. To me, the answer is a given, they're made for center mounting, so don't mount them any differently, quite simple isn't it?
Dec 19 2009 4:22PM
0 0
profile picture
B.Pol
Posts: 1750 - Karma: 59

Thank you for all the advice dick-ish or not, I apprecaite it.

To all the people that said why would you mount them center or whatever, I did mount them center I was just asking if it was a bad idea. And taking a general concenses it seems like it is. That is why I am not doing it. And I am not one of those kids that buy skis cause they look cool, I knew what I wanted and these are the skis that seemed best for me, because they are great for park and they also work a lot of other parts of the hill. I wish I could affored pow skis, if any of you guys want to sell me some in the 161 to 170 range hit me up

Dec 19 2009 5:45PM
0 0
profile picture
Parrish
Posts: 8695 - Karma: 1,009
This, A million times. Its your ski that you ride.
Dec 19 2009 6:06PM
0 0
profile picture
shredables
Posts: 647 - Karma: 19
the way they are set up right now is for park only. those skis will perform well anywhere. re mount the bindings for free ride
Dec 19 2009 6:13PM
0 0
profile picture
SSteezle
Posts: 9300 - Karma: 7,694
douchebag.

And there are plenty of symmetrical skis that have 3 different mounting locations. The chop sticks for example. You really don't know much...
Dec 19 2009 6:36PM
0 0
profile picture
eheath
Posts: 61712 - Karma: 124,320
Mounting a symmetrical ski not at center is just silly, defeats the purpose might as well have directional skis.
Dec 19 2009 6:43PM
0 0
profile picture
SSteezle
Posts: 9300 - Karma: 7,694
just because a ski is symmetrical doesn't mean it has the same flex patterns on both ends of the ski. There are plenty of deep pow skis that are symmetrical and can be mounted back from center, especially if it's a touring setup
Dec 19 2009 6:47PM
0 0
profile picture
eheath
Posts: 61712 - Karma: 124,320
Seems dumb to make a symmetrical ski that doesn't have symmetrical flex. Oh well.
Dec 19 2009 6:51PM
0 0
profile picture
Big_Spence
Posts: 16177 - Karma: 4,352
1. These are Anthems. They do have symmetrical flex fucktard.
2. Far from a deep pow ski, and yes I know man symmetrical skis have different mounting points. The Moment Reno Rockers for example. I know the Anthems are not because I have a pair.
3. These are far from a touring set up.

So seems you're the one who doesn't know a whole lot.
Dec 19 2009 7:53PM
0 0
profile picture
SSteezle
Posts: 9300 - Karma: 7,694
everyone likes their skis different, some like skis centered others like them a couple cm's back. there are obviously people out there that feel that their anthems should be mounted back from center or else this thread wouldn't exist.



Dec 19 2009 8:09PM
0 0
profile picture
Big_Spence
Posts: 16177 - Karma: 4,352
God you're retarded. He doesn't feel that they should be, he asked if we as fellow NS'ers thought about the idea.

So you're wrong again.
Dec 19 2009 8:11PM
0 0
profile picture
SSteezle
Posts: 9300 - Karma: 7,694
and that's how you replied. so fuck you
Dec 19 2009 8:12PM
0 0
profile picture
fouldsys
Posts: 7404 - Karma: 39
you bought a symmetrical ski and now you want to ski pow? thats your fault.
Dec 19 2009 8:13PM
0 0
profile picture
Jibbernaut
Posts: 69 - Karma: 15
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Dec 19 2009 8:31PM
0 0
profile picture
SKIU4EA
Posts: 2387 - Karma: 2,072
Fuck all this... ski rentals.    i know you want to +k me for it, but don't worry bout it.
Dec 19 2009 8:49PM
0 0
profile picture
Big_Spence
Posts: 16177 - Karma: 4,352
That's because it was an insanely stupid thread to start.
Just like you trying to argue with me is insanely stupid because you're clearly wrong and you're just proving more and more with every unintelligent response you make.
Dec 19 2009 9:53PM
0 0
profile picture
SSteezle
Posts: 9300 - Karma: 7,694
haha your a sad sad person
Dec 20 2009 10:49AM
0 0
profile picture
spliff.Life
Posts: 7847 - Karma: 1,549
 
Dec 20 2009 10:56AM
0 0
profile picture
Ben.
Posts: 21463 - Karma: 683
than you should have bought something other than anthems.
Dec 20 2009 12:06PM
0 0
profile picture
Ben.
Posts: 21463 - Karma: 683
no. please name me a symmetrical pow ski
Dec 20 2009 12:08PM
0 0
profile picture
Big_Spence
Posts: 16177 - Karma: 4,352
Volkl Chopsticks are. But their flex isn't symmetrical, so they're not comparable to the Anthem at all.
Dec 20 2009 12:58PM
0 0
profile picture
Candy
Posts: 1052 - Karma: 176
Surface New Life
Dec 20 2009 1:19PM
0 0
profile picture
Ben.
Posts: 21463 - Karma: 683
are they symmetrical flex?
Dec 20 2009 1:23PM
0 0
profile picture
Candy
Posts: 1052 - Karma: 176
It doesn't say on their website, but I've flexed them before, and the flex felt even throughout the whole ski.
Dec 20 2009 1:28PM
0 0
profile picture
Ben.
Posts: 21463 - Karma: 683
hm. alright ill give you that one then hahaha.
Dec 20 2009 1:43PM
0 0
All times are Eastern (-5)