Who would you consider to be the GREATEST ATHLETE ever?

Posts: 9371 - Karma: 61

Karma: 61

Posts: 9371

Crazy Fool

is it MJ? lebron?

tough question like the other thread i made last night, but again its very open to discussion

in my opinion, it has to be someone that's recent, because the competition these days is soooo much more fierce than the competition from say 20 years ago

how do you measure how good of an athlete one is? does he have to be a multisport star, or just dominate his own? michael phelps can dominate swimming, but can he play basketball better than say, cliff lee? do you measure success by championships? does that make bill russell, who has 11 nba championship rings, the greatest athlete ever?

IMO, its probably lebron. just look at his size, skillset, and overall athletic competence

randy moss is also up there, just because of pure speed and ridiculous hand eye coordination

Nov 4 2009 1:27PM

0 0

CaptTurner

Posts: 179 - Karma: 356

Karma: 356

Posts: 179

Pro

I would have to say the most freakish athlete today is Lebron, he could got out and play NFL football if he wanted, and be good.

Nov 4 2009 8:09PM

0 0

hey-dude-its-me

Posts: 4238 - Karma: 412

Karma: 412

Posts: 4238

No Life

lose.

1912 isn't in the last 20 years

Nov 4 2009 8:16PM

0 0

ski@jaypeak2

Posts: 2802 - Karma: 429

Karma: 429

Posts: 2802

Addict

It was OP's opinion that it would be someone in the last 20 years because of the level of intensity/competition

Nov 4 2009 8:17PM

0 0

PAuL_Hellar

Posts: 1355 - Karma: 62

Karma: 62

Posts: 1355

Insane

my top 3 would be iverson,bo jackson, deion sanders

Nov 4 2009 8:18PM

0 0

Pow.yuHdig*

Posts: 1903 - Karma: 146

Karma: 146

Posts: 1903

Insane

phelps or bolt cuz they are kinda like true athletes running and swimming knaw wat i mean

Nov 4 2009 8:23PM

0 0

hey-dude-its-me

Posts: 4238 - Karma: 412

Karma: 412

Posts: 4238

No Life

ok, well even 20 years ago Jim Thorpe wouldn't have been able to accomplish half of what he accomplished in 1912. Just simple improvements in things like nutrition and exercise science would automatically exclude him from this list. So I'm still not sure why he's your choice, and I'm def not hating on you bc I really like this guy too. If this thread were titled, "The most dominant athlete of his/her era" then yea it would be him.

Nov 4 2009 8:26PM

0 0

Sierra_P3

Posts: 19 - Karma: 40

Karma: 40

Posts: 19

Newb

ummmmm Mr. Phelps striaght boss

Nov 4 2009 8:26PM

0 0

ski@jaypeak2

Posts: 2802 - Karma: 429

Karma: 429

Posts: 2802

Addict

For the same reasons ESPN picked him as #2 best athlete of all time. I mean honestly will all these answers you choose to argue against Jim Thorpe? I mean OP said Randy freaking Moss!!

Nov 4 2009 8:29PM

0 0

hey-dude-its-me

Posts: 4238 - Karma: 412

Karma: 412

Posts: 4238

No Life

trust me I called him out in my first post

Nov 4 2009 8:35PM

0 0

mr_grom

Posts: 708 - Karma: 51

Karma: 51

Posts: 708

Ridiculous

Tiger Woods=Freak athlete. Runs like a 4.5, probably lifts more than a lot of football players, most successful golfer in history or at least will be.
Oh and did I mention he managed to win the U.S. Open with a shattered knee?

Nov 4 2009 8:43PM

0 0

babaganoush

Posts: 157 - Karma: 10

Karma: 10

Posts: 157

Pro

this.

Nov 4 2009 8:47PM

0 0

blong131

Posts: 2193 - Karma: 59

Karma: 59

Posts: 2193

Addict

some of the responses in this thread have been so jokes

LANCE LANCE LANCE

arguably not the greatest cyclist of all time, but surely the greatest athlete of all time. /thread

Nov 4 2009 8:55PM

0 0

nasSKIIER

Posts: 748 - Karma: 15

Karma: 15

Posts: 748

Ridiculous

i was thinking about this earlier today..wow what a coincidence

Nov 4 2009 9:01PM

0 0

snocompton

Posts: 2014 - Karma: 268

Karma: 268

Posts: 2014

Addict

Usain Bolt. Doesnt get much more athletic then the fastest human alive

Nov 4 2009 9:21PM

0 0

NUTSECKS

Posts: 52 - Karma: 10

Karma: 10

Posts: 52

Wannabe

PROBABLY ME but idk LOL

Nov 4 2009 9:26PM

0 0

ElbridgeGerry

Posts: 5902 - Karma: -27

Karma: -27

Posts: 5902

No Life

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stirling_Mortlock

Stirling Mortlock. The man weighs 231 lbs, is 6'3" and can easily run around for 75 minutes at full speed. He's also fucking tough as nails and gets stomped on with spiked boots. I am so suprised no one said a Rugby player so far.

Nov 4 2009 9:51PM

0 0

TheMoostafian

Posts: 4504 - Karma: 9,435

Karma: 9,435

Posts: 4504

No Life

usain bolt anyone?

Nov 4 2009 9:56PM

0 0

ATLskier

Posts: 8203 - Karma: 406

Karma: 406

Posts: 8203

Crazy Fool

pele
jordan
Gretzky

Nov 4 2009 10:09PM

0 0

Drew.C

Posts: 1757 - Karma: 39

Karma: 39

Posts: 1757

Insane

drew brees is better than brady, peyton manning is better than brady

Nov 4 2009 10:10PM

0 0

_steffen_

Posts: 903 - Karma: 124

Karma: 124

Posts: 903

Insane

barbara streisand

Nov 4 2009 10:12PM

0 0

ElbridgeGerry

Posts: 5902 - Karma: -27

Karma: -27

Posts: 5902

No Life

How many football players could do that to a fucking 190 lb Human Being

Nov 4 2009 10:20PM

0 0

hey-dude-its-me

Posts: 4238 - Karma: 412

Karma: 412

Posts: 4238

No Life

almost all of them. what a shitty point to make for your argument...

Nov 4 2009 10:26PM

0 0

artfullydodged

Posts: 8358 - Karma: 1,674

Karma: 1,674

Posts: 8358

Crazy Fool

jim thorpe

Nov 4 2009 10:37PM

0 0

ElbridgeGerry

Posts: 5902 - Karma: -27

Karma: -27

Posts: 5902

No Life

Correction, the guy he threw was about 210 lbs. The guy he tackled was also 16 metres from the sideline.

Nov 4 2009 10:50PM

0 0

anarski

Posts: 120 - Karma: 11

Karma: 11

Posts: 120

Pro

I didn't read the whole thread but just off the title the first person to come to mind was Gordie Howe. He played till he was like 50 and is widely regarded as one of the top players of all time, plus we need some fucking canadians on this list.

Nov 4 2009 11:30PM

0 0

Ian.Ham

Posts: 1687 - Karma: 1,153

Karma: 1,153

Posts: 1687

Insane

there is a difference between having base qualities such as speed, size, etc. What you cant measure is the comparison of skill between different sports, this whole debate is not going to reach a consensus. If you want to measure just straight strength, speed, size then football players would probably win. But you cant compare athletes when they compare for different sports.

Nov 5 2009 12:25AM

0 0

dmc12380

Posts: 3545 - Karma: 792

Karma: 792

Posts: 3545

Addict

harry potter

Nov 5 2009 1:06AM

0 0

Bepo

Posts: 8195 - Karma: 17

Karma: 17

Posts: 8195

Crazy Fool

agreed, thats a really shitty argument seeing as most nfl running backs are stronger than rugby players... the advantage they have is endurance not strength.

the reason rugby players have more endurance is because thats what rugby is. Football is all raw strength and burst speed so that's what football players focus on and train. The reason football players don't have the same endurance as rugby and soccer players isn't because they're inferior athletes, its because they don't train for it.

Nov 5 2009 1:38AM

0 0

Clevinger

Posts: 394 - Karma: 8

Karma: 8

Posts: 394

Loner

World-class sprinters are incredibly awesome people. Nobody, and I mean nobody, exerts nearly as much raw power as these guys do. Watching a proper start from standing level is a bit like watching a normal person stepping on a land mine. No hesitation. No transitional periods. Just fucking speed like you wouldn't believe released in the fraction of a second like they spend their lives walking around waiting for a gun to go off. I do feel hope for humanity when I watch these guys run. I understand how we got to the top of the food chain. I feel inspired.

Usain Bolt not only defeats these demi-gods, he clowns the ever-loving shit out of them. He doesn't win races, he makes you doubt their objectivity. He makes people who probably would have been worshipped in antiquity look like they're standing still. Watch Beijing 2008. Watch it again. Consider the raw, unadulterated speed of everyone ELSE in that race and then look at that margin. It looks like a seventh grader having a race with a bunch of nerdy fifth graders, doesn't it? Except those nerdy fifth graders finish the race when you're only two-thirds of the way down the track. We should probably make a whole new class for this guy, but we really don't have a word to describe it.

I don't believe anyone will break 9.59 for at least another 40 years. One hundred meters is a frankly obscene distance to cover in nine and a half seconds. I begin to doubt that Bolt can even top that. That's not a record, that's the extent of human ability.

Now consider that he really prefers the 200.

Nov 5 2009 1:43AM

0 0

lineskier10

Posts: 11339 - Karma: 796

Karma: 796

Posts: 11339

Crazy Fool

i agree but its hard to say that when his career was so short, if being the greatest athlete ever means being in insane shape and being great at multiple sports then hands down Jim Thorpe, Olympic gold medalist in the decathalon and pentathalon, and also played professional football, baseball, and basketball, while he wasnt doing that he ran down deer and killed them with his bare hands, maybe i made the last part up but Jim Thorpe was the best athlete of all time

Nov 5 2009 1:51AM

0 0

scratchproteen

Posts: 5173 - Karma: 286

Karma: 286

Posts: 5173

No Life

every single one? plus a 15 yard penalty.

Nov 5 2009 2:23AM

0 0

scratchproteen

Posts: 5173 - Karma: 286

Karma: 286

Posts: 5173

No Life

does drew brees or peyton manning have 3 superbowl championships?

sure peyton had the single season touchdown passing record but brady beat it.

In the end if brady stays healthy and has a solid team...he will be the greatest quarter back of all time.

Nov 5 2009 2:27AM

0 0

-ROY-

Posts: 3633 - Karma: 1,503

Karma: 1,503

Posts: 3633

Addict

sweetness!!

Nov 5 2009 2:31AM

0 0

Hermondo

Posts: 1244 - Karma: 52

Karma: 52

Posts: 1244

Insane

false. lance's legs are bigger than peterson's head, no doubt

Nov 5 2009 12:01PM

0 0

Steezius_Maximus

Posts: 1152 - Karma: 22

Karma: 22

Posts: 1152

Insane

the long distance runners the guys that sprint like 120 km

Nov 5 2009 12:30PM

0 0

bananas

Posts: 1419 - Karma: 158

Karma: 158

Posts: 1419

Insane

this guy

Nov 5 2009 2:08PM

0 0

k-rob

Posts: 14217 - Karma: 2,891

Karma: 2,891

Posts: 14217

Crazy Fool

Bruce Lee.

Nov 5 2009 2:09PM

0 0

[fisher]

Posts: 1325 - Karma: 11

Karma: 11

Posts: 1325

Insane

Nov 5 2009 2:10PM

0 0

SlickRick.

Posts: 4329 - Karma: 300

Karma: 300

Posts: 4329

No Life

are you honestly saying that brett farve has the athletic ability equal to or greater than adrian peterson and lebron james? holy shit

Nov 5 2009 2:10PM

0 0

BC.

Posts: 1551 - Karma: 86

Karma: 86

Posts: 1551

Insane

Its gonna be a football player more than likely that has the greatest versatility combining all elements of raw athleticism. Definitely a running back. Who is up for grabs.

Nov 5 2009 2:33PM

0 0

zues

Posts: 6434 - Karma: -5,330

Karma: -5,330

Posts: 6434

No Life

this. he is the hardest working, greatest athlete ever. period.
tennis is one of the hardest sports to master, those who play it know what i'm talking about. its much different than basketball or baseball or football, its harder.

Nov 5 2009 2:54PM

0 0