Welcome to the Newschoolers forums! You may read the forums as a guest, however you must be a registered member to post. Register to become a member today!
The logic that is used is something like ......- if u are more concerned that your bindings SHOULD release or if it is safer for them to release then u are in the consumer / regular situation.
If your performance is such that it would be death if your ur binding released on u while on ur in-run or u doing ur trick / skiing then your are more concerned with retention.
So if u forces of chatter, hi impact, angles, speed etc....u may fee better with a hi DIN.
So pros crank it up so that they won't get prerelease. freeride and freestyle go up to DIN16.
There are binding s available to racers that are not available to the public that go to Din 20 and higher...u don't want to have a ski chatter off at 140 km in a downhill.
Release vs. Retention the only reasons to go either way.
Type 3 - Aggressive, higher speed skiing at higher release/retention settings. Skers who designate themselves "3" must accept a narrower margin of release in order to gain a wider margin of retention.
Caucasian_AsianThere are some really stupid replies in this thread.
RubberSoulgod i can't stand posts like this. "there are some really stupid replies in this thread.....but im not going to say which ones they are or refute them, or even offer the slightest bit of info myself. i just want to sound superior"
for park and big mtn skiers, there's a big range used obviously. back in the day in east coast parks i heard of and saw certain pros/ams riding their 16s and 18s maxed out. FUCK that
Caveman.I know a race coach who used to buy turn 18 DIN table bindings, take the springs out, put washers in the binding to increase spring tension then turn them all the way up. This was a long time ago when it would be safe to do something like this.
Caucasian_AsianThere are some really stupid replies in this thread.
Big_SpenceYeah, but they're Salomons, so the binding will probably break soon enough.