Look Bindings

I want to try the new Line Reactor bindings

i think just the look of the binding
Haggard Skis

Rossi Owns look right?
**************************
the best idea ever was the one that was diabolicly hatched today at lunch in the hall way of my school. It involved a boat and beer and selling that beer to 14 yearolds for like $3 a bottel, so that way from every 24 we got, we would get 12 and then never have to pay for our own beer again. and if the poilice tried to stop us, we were drive away in a boat (which doesnt have a licence plate) but, if there were on a baot, we were throw peanuts at them, cause its highly probable that one of them in alergic to then and he would go into anaphletic shock and we were get away. if that didnt work we were catapult cows at them and wait for the headlines 'police boat sunk by flying cows'. --Apple.

the difference is the price


The shit hasnt even begun to hit the fan

no no dynastar owns look (and lange) but rossi and look binders are functionally identical
----------------------
the skis look like joints cuz they smoke the competition -crystalneedsapark

east coast

well here's a question: which weighs more, the p12 ti or the p12 jib?
Broken legs suck balls

Doesn't the P12 ti usually come with a lifter?

yea i may be worng, but i think the ti is more for carving and all mountain and it has the lifter



jibba jabba

First off:
Rossi owns Dynastar and every company associated with them (I.E. Look, Lange, Kerma). As for the bindings, I believe that the Ti has a lifter. Also, if you observe carefully the Jib brake unit, it has a special unit which draws the brakes up and against the side housing of the heelpiece. I do not know for sure if the other Look models have this. Personally, I came off of a damp beginner ski onto Troublemakers with P12 Jibs (no lift at all) and I can carve better on the TMs than any beginner/intermediate 'carving ski' no matter how much lift you put on it. I think carving is more about edge/tune quality and ski construction then the amount of plastic air between your boot sole and the ski.

i have tm's and p-10 lifters and i cant tell the difference between my friends p12's so i dont know
i thought this thread was called 'Garfield and Skiing' i must say i am disappointed
-alpentalik

p12 jib has a softer lifter for shock and vibration absorbtion and it has steel rather than titanium for strength (it weighs about 3 ounces more. Big fucking deal). The jib also features a troublemaker inspired graphic and the locking brake feature. The locking brakes stay tight against the ski so on hard landings switch where your heel lifts up, it doesnt release the brakes close enough to the snow and catch, resulting in you going ass over head switch to your death.

Other than that the Ti and the Jib feature the same elastic travel and pivot heelpiece. Both bindings are amongst the safest and best functioning bindings in the industry.


Liberty Skis . com. New website comming soon with new gear!

Thank You Mister Spinks!
I'm glad to see at least one other person knowing what the fuck they're talking about when it comes to technical industry shit. You are exactly right in your analysis and i was only suprised you didn't set the other kid straight on his whole rossi kick. Rossignal does not own Dynaster and its affiliates they are both owned by the same parent company. As for the bindings they are Look designed and marketed under both brand names because they kick so much ass. On a lighter note I think Titanium will continue to be irrelevant until they can cunstruct the entire heel houseing out of it and get it to hold a green spring. Of course then we'll start to see the first park bindings that cost more than your park ski but just think of that 2 more inches of air you'll be getting!!!