Welcome to the Newschoolers forums! You may read the forums as a guest, however you must be a registered member to post. Register to become a member today!
wait a second....a price point ski replacing INVADERS might have a durability problem..?
sorry, that was too harsh. What I wonder about is how A Bangs with 25 hard days on them will compare with Thalls(09 and 2010 models) with equal days on them. Both skis have a flex point close to the binding, 176 Thalls will measure about 178.5 along the base and A Bangs are 178s(I think) so that comparo could be good... My bet is I would like Thalls more, I bet that A Bangs will break in a LOT and end up pretty soft throughout after 20 days, where Thalls will break in a bit and stay near that flex for a long time. Also I don't like symmetrical skis... but we will all see after people have time on A Bangs
not trying to scare anybody but i saw it and got a little bummed... seems like the durability might be an issue with tho wood idk tho def waiting a year if i pick a pair uip
my theory: if it's made like a skateboard, it will probably break like one. the more the a bangs take a beating, the softer they'll get, like every other ski, but with parallel construction like they have, i could see the material holding the plys together going bad and the ply's snapping... just my opinion i guess... line makes dope shit, but i've been skeptical about the a bangs since i first heard about em...
i don't understand the whole idea of having "skate plys" for a ski... it just seems structurally weak logically... maybe thats the problem i'm having...