A quick word on blocking ads
It looks like you are using an ad blocker. That's okay. Who doesn't? But without advertising revenue, we can't keep making this site awesome. Click the link below for instructions on disabling adblock.
I am finishing up my 333 design, which has dimensions of 131/142/118/125/116 in a 192. I gave the tail a short(16cm) 3cm rise rocker, and 10cm of taper(plus 4cm normal tail curve that is cut off like EHPs). Not a twin twip. Mount will be from -5 to -6(possibly -7) with Dukes. I haven't skied a pin tail ski before, but thought it made more sense than a full out normal sidecut tail on a ski aimed at pow. What do you guys think of skis like S7/193 EHPs tails for pow/curd charging, and for trees?
Oh and I might as well throw out the design to see what people think, here is just about everything:
-Length:192
-dimensions:131/142/118/125/116 (so skinniest part of tip taper/fattest part of tip/skinniest part of waist/fattest part of tail/skinniest part of tail taper)
-24cm tip length, 10cm of which is normal tip curve, 14 of which is taper.(good)-14cm tail length, 4cm of which is the start of normal tail curvature, then there will be a 6cm wide flat(straight across) tail(make sense? Like EHP)
-38cm length tip rocker(measuring straight no slack) with 7.2cm total rise in each ski.
-16cm tail "rocker" that is constantly curving with 3.5cm of rise.
-5mm of camber underfoot on each ski.
-flex: medium in the tip(or just over medium), medium-stiff tail and stiff underfoot.
this is half of the tip rocker size(vague sketch, but gives you guys an idea). I apologize in advance for the most likely failness of the picture coming up: [IMG]http://img256.imageshack.us/img256/9229/38x72rocker3.png[/IMG]