Member of the Month

KilaTsunami
October, 2024

Online

Welcome to the Newschoolers forums! You may read the forums as a guest, however you must be a registered member to post. Register to become a member today!

Chronics or Walls

profile picture
BNik
Posts: 543 - Karma: 268
Yo ive been looking at these skis for a while and stil cant make the choice. I ride park mostly (midwest kid) but i wanna ski that can handle more than park. Just wondering on what ski would be better for park or if they are to stiff to jib some threads have had read it seems like people say that bolth skis are to stiff thanks. idk if you need it but im 5'8 about 145 pounds. Thanks
Jul 18 2009 1:11PM
0 0
profile picture
Newschool_Pope
Posts: 2473 - Karma: 267
the walls are dope, had them 1 year ago but sold them, from the money i bought new armada ar6 but i regret having sold the walls. they are awesome, hold a good edge, due to their stiffness you can really charge on them and dont have to worry. as i skied them i was 6" and had them in 178 i think, but i would be happier if id have took them in 185.

havent skid the chronics yet, but id go for the walls, you want a symetrical ski for park.
guess that both skis are good and you cant go wrong with either, so just demo them or go for which ever top sheet you like better.
peace
Jul 18 2009 1:27PM
0 0
profile picture
pigglywiggly
Posts: 4482 - Karma: 305

if the majority of your time is out of the park, then chronics

if the majority of your time is in the park, then walls

Jul 19 2009 4:16PM
0 0
profile picture
japanada
Posts: 13784 - Karma: 1,957
Both are stiffer skis, with great construction! Midwest wise, the walls may be a bit better as they are symetrical, as for all mtn, I would say that they are both going to ski very similarly.
Jul 19 2009 7:00PM
0 0
profile picture
Murdock
Posts: 77 - Karma: 175
id get the walls man,vokl has always made good products and i really like the walls in general.
Jul 20 2009 12:49AM
0 0
profile picture
3R1C
Posts: 367 - Karma: 14
the walls will hold up great all mtn and are a great ski for the park
Jul 20 2009 1:58PM
0 0
profile picture
HamFaceGirl
Posts: 5242 - Karma: 2,676
id get walls
Jul 20 2009 6:23PM
0 0
profile picture
Keith_M
Posts: 795 - Karma: 771
I love line, I love chronics, they are awesome, I think you would be happy with them.

But then theres the walls (haven't ridden any), which I think would be the better choice from what i've heard from people
Jul 21 2009 12:24AM
0 0
profile picture
rep_your_hood
Posts: 533 - Karma: 13
The Walls are probably the better choice but they definatley cost more than the chronics. They are a lot more durrable as well.
Jul 22 2009 10:06AM
0 0
profile picture
Slinger1x1
Posts: 8853 - Karma: 66
fischer addicts
Jul 22 2009 10:39AM
0 0
profile picture
rep_your_hood
Posts: 533 - Karma: 13
o i forgot that the thread was called Chronics or Walls (or Addicts)
Jul 22 2009 10:49AM
0 0
profile picture
Slinger1x1
Posts: 8853 - Karma: 66
creative joke man, really cool
its just a suggestion, its in the exact same category as the walls and chronics, symmetrical and stiff, plus is double as a really good all mountain ski as well, and i can vouch for that. and i can give him a sick price on a pair
Jul 22 2009 10:57AM
0 0
profile picture
rep_your_hood
Posts: 533 - Karma: 13
man i was just playin. the chronics are symetrical. they are mounted back.
Jul 22 2009 11:00AM
0 0
All times are Eastern (-5)