Welcome to the Newschoolers forums! You may read the forums as a guest, however you must be a registered member to post.
Register to become a member today!
what film? - for your camera
Posts: 16
-
Karma: 10
what does everybody with a film camera use? i havent taken too many sking pics yet. tend to take a lot of other pics though. i normally use b&w like kodak tri-x 400 or the ilford delta range. ive just put a fuji slide film through my camera taking some pics of snowboarders. anysuggests on what colour films look good? do i need colour? im thinking i do, or does black and white work well?
Posts: 1694
-
Karma: 73
FujiFilm Provia 100F
FujiFilm Velvia 50
Kodak E100 VS
are all pretty good, all slide films though
Posts: 2102
-
Karma: 44
Kodak elite crome slide film. It's really cheap on b&h and it takes great pictures.
This year I hope to see more kids incorporating newschol with big mountain ridning and getting out of the park- Matt Levinthal
Posts: 1336
-
Karma: 14
obviously it depends on your own personal style, which is one of the greatest things about photography (producing your style on film), I think that it is really important, especially when starting out to get down color and B&W in different conditions, lighting, types of shot, etc. But for overall use, my personal favorite film to use is slide film peticularly the Fuji Velvia 50. Its sharp, rich, and good for so many situations.
Posts: 8586
-
Karma: 34
Ilford delta 400 and 100 BW.
Fuji 400 and 100.
Fuji Tungsten 64
Fuji Velvia 50 (I have a 100' bulk roll on the way)
Posts: 840
-
Karma: 10
i hate 400 speed film, and for some reason thats all i ever shoot with
O yes, you can ski backcountry is syracuse ny
'me and my girlfriend were going at it the other night and she was on top and we were bonin hard, and my dick slipped out between thrusts and went up her ass. she screamed and cried for 45 minutes, it sucked.' -skiflake
Posts: 1946
-
Karma: 14
tmax 3200 or 400. its been about a year of nothing but t-max for my camera
'He got fired? What did he do?'
'He jumped off of the roof again'
Posts: 257
-
Karma: 10
Fuji Velvia 100 is the best plain and simple
|DON'T QUALLS IT UP!|
Posts: 8586
-
Karma: 34
I bought a 100' bulk roll of 50 ISO velvia.
Posts: 5724
-
Karma: 372
ya all my pics are fuji provIA 100F
'I should put my camera on a tripod - its easier to drink beer that way' - dirty steve
NS royal gangstar
Posts: 509
-
Karma: -55
compact flash
PH represent
Posts: 16
-
Karma: 10
film is so much nicer though. you just cant feel your way round a digital camera the way you can a film camera.
Posts: 18901
-
Karma: 75
i'm compact flash as well. Or digital 8. Neither of those is film though.
Coming Soon...
Posts: 222
-
Karma: 11
CF also.
But shooting RAW helps you mimic film types.
--------------------
what...
Posts: 2060
-
Karma: 7
i use kodak tri-x...... it seems to be prity good.
Posts: 16
-
Karma: 10
yea, i use a lot of tri-x - just not for ski-ing yet. it got a great grain pattern if you push it to 1600 iso.
Posts: 99
-
Karma: 10
compact flash, or if using film, anything around 200-400 iso.
Posts: 9956
-
Karma: 18
there isn't too much difference anymore between film and digi-slrs cept' price.
Posts: 16
-
Karma: 10
dont start this argument...i will only contribute one statement to this. film grain will always look nicer than digital noise. fullstop. no buts. film handles difficult conditions much better.
Posts: 2523
-
Karma: 227
Provia 200
------------------------------------------------------------
Smokey, this is bowling, not Nam. There are Rules.
Posts: 8586
-
Karma: 34
Phrosty, you would need a digi-SLR with an image processor capable of about 26Megapixels to match the image quality you can get with an SLR
Posts: 1336
-
Karma: 14
Its true. Even though like every photo studio uses digital SLRs now because its so much easier and the quality has greatly increased over the years, the fact is that you can get so much better pics with an SLR than with a digital SLR that will cost about 3 times as much. All it comes down to is convinience vs. highest quality.
Posts: 1336
-
Karma: 14
Its true. Even though like every photo studio uses digital SLRs now because its so much easier and the quality has greatly increased over the years, the fact is that you can get so much better pics with an SLR than with a digital SLR that will cost about 3 times as much. All it comes down to is convinience vs. highest quality.
Posts: 8586
-
Karma: 34
Lots of photo places don't even use Digi SLRs, just regular digis.
Some guy doing team photos at our school just had a Fuji 5MP digi cam hooked up to a laptop... it was kind of a weird set up for a professional place.
Posts: 1861
-
Karma: 16
yea man i won't have to use film as soon as my dad decides to get his canon digital SLR. 13-megapixels, oh god thats shit-your-pants-its-so-good quality
I'm Rick James bitch!
Posts: 16
-
Karma: 10
film has a greater latitude than digital (at least negative film does). you can be further out with the exposure and still retrieve a good image.
All times are Eastern (-5)
