Member of the Month

partyandBS
December, 2024

Online

Welcome to the Newschoolers forums! You may read the forums as a guest, however you must be a registered member to post. Register to become a member today!

Improbably Collapse: Best 911 video yet

profile picture
q12
Posts: 152 - Karma: 9
Done by scientists!!!!

skip the first ten minutes or so



listen to people with PHDs, branch out from clear channel news outlets. OPEN YOUR EYES.

im not telling you who to believe but if this doesnt raise some concerns youre hopeless
Apr 14 2009 11:56PM
0 0
profile picture
Dr_Feelgood
Posts: 1176 - Karma: 15
sparknotes? sorry i dont have an hour of my life to waste
Apr 14 2009 11:58PM
0 0
profile picture
Nicholas.
Posts: 10905 - Karma: 60
hey you...yeah you...shut the fuck up.
Apr 15 2009 12:03AM
0 0
profile picture
Mr.Panda
Posts: 17711 - Karma: 564
could we keep all the 9/11 stuff to one thread?  please?
Apr 15 2009 12:04AM
0 0
profile picture
Beefcake
Posts: 378 - Karma: 10
sounds like james earl jones is commentating.
Apr 15 2009 2:52AM
0 0
profile picture
q12
Posts: 152 - Karma: 9
1
Apr 15 2009 6:01PM
0 0
profile picture
GingerKid08
Posts: 1320 - Karma: 13
Your thread title lost you all credibility.
Apr 15 2009 6:13PM
0 0
profile picture
cottonwoodarmada1651
Posts: 1734 - Karma: 40
Having a PhD doesn't make you immune to paranoid schizophrenia.

Anyone who believes this shit is legally retarded.
Apr 15 2009 7:10PM
0 0
profile picture
q12
Posts: 152 - Karma: 9
why and did you actually watch it?

dont you find it suspicious that they wont show building 7 collapse?
Apr 15 2009 8:49PM
0 0
profile picture
Lenard
Posts: 35 - Karma: 11
oh saw bush's face before i clicked play and lost any motivation to do so
Apr 15 2009 8:53PM
0 0
profile picture
q12
Posts: 152 - Karma: 9
haha coming from someone who clicked on the title and took time to post. but you probably are too closed minded to not consider that the 911 commision got shit wrong.

no wait, can you even admit that they should have mentioned building 7? or is it cool with you they avoided it.

i am not claiming to have credibility dumbass. i didnt make the film, i am not in the film. jeez you suck at life
Apr 15 2009 9:09PM
0 0
profile picture
Blurst
Posts: 13577 - Karma: 10,169
ya well you suck at NS! keep the 911 stuff in one thread
Apr 15 2009 9:12PM
0 0
profile picture
q12
Posts: 152 - Karma: 9
dont send me messages for or against, post that shit
Apr 15 2009 11:10PM
0 0
profile picture
ElbridgeGerry
Posts: 5902 - Karma: -27
Have you ever noticed all the CREDIBLE scientists realize it was a terror attack?

You really make me lose faith in humanity.
Apr 15 2009 11:15PM
0 0
profile picture
josh.
Posts: 3469 - Karma: 42
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LD06SAf0p9A

i just showed you it, now shut up.
Apr 15 2009 11:15PM
0 0
profile picture
wnab21
Posts: 1313 - Karma: 18
Click for larger image
Apr 15 2009 11:20PM
0 0
profile picture
fsscott
Posts: 4684 - Karma: 114
this
Apr 15 2009 11:24PM
0 0
profile picture
q12
Posts: 152 - Karma: 9
well you just proved you didnt watch the film. major news networks CNN CSNBC ...... wont show WTC 7 fall. obviously youtube does.


so sit down, spend 45 min (skip the intro and conclusion) and watch this... until then, you can shut up
Apr 15 2009 11:50PM
0 0
profile picture
josh.
Posts: 3469 - Karma: 42
ive heard most arguments on it, there all stupid and there made by stupid people who cant wrap it around they're heads that the gov. doesnt hate them. a plane hit the towers the jet fuel and furnishings in the towers burned hot enough to melt the steel, this would not make it fall over side ways as you would think,  but the towers collapsed on them selfs, the debry caused the interior of  wtc 7 to burn and do the same.
Apr 16 2009 1:27AM
0 0
profile picture
squibble
Posts: 4569 - Karma: 104
^jet fuel does not burn hot enough, you cant dispute that, it just CAN NOT melt structural metal.

its very interesting and well put together. there are so many variables involved its hard to draw any solid conclusions on what exactly caused the buildings to collapse. im skeptical, but i tend to be on the non-conspirator side. the demolition of buildings is a very technical and hard to execute job, its pretty fucking incredible that the wtc collapsed the way they did.
Apr 16 2009 2:18AM
0 0
profile picture
coolhandluke
Posts: 4465 - Karma: 153
big words from a day old alias. 

and your "scientist" threw around "steel columns" so many times like they're all the same, from a W8 to a W44.  never mentioned load paths, free body diagrams, or attempted simple structural calcs.

want to learn some thing real about building collapse from the most legit engineers?  how about AISC?  never heard of them?  then speaking about steel framed structures is probably out of your realm of knowledge. 
http://www.scribd.com/doc/13926908/AISC-Plast


Apr 16 2009 2:34AM
0 0
profile picture
thelizards
Posts: 4042 - Karma: 43
owned
Apr 16 2009 1:29PM
0 0
profile picture
tommyp1ckles
Posts: 1337 - Karma: 55
although jet fuel couldnt alone melt the metal the combination of both aluminium and plaster (both present a t the time of the crash creates what is known as thermite which when combined with heat creates a reaction that can create thousands of degrees of heat ... thus melting the metal....
also in theory the metal wouldnt even have ot be completely melted because of the fact that metal when heated exponentialy loses strength; so all youd need is to heat the metal up somewhat.... not to mention that the thermite could have melted right through it.

ps .... most conspiracy theorys can be solved through common sense and good ol science.
ie the mythbusters moon landing hoax special

not saying we shouldnt question some things but use your head
Apr 16 2009 1:49PM
0 0
profile picture
fujarome
Posts: 8630 - Karma: 1,561
what most people seem to not realize is that it may not have been hot enough to melt it completely, but it was hot enough to weaken it, which is all that was necessary to bring it down.
Apr 16 2009 1:50PM
0 0
profile picture
tommyp1ckles
Posts: 1337 - Karma: 55
yeh i agree... the towers somehow falling sideways deifies logic ... the building was built as a bunch of flat floors so if it where to start falling it would only start by falling by like 1 floor; thus taking out the next one (and so on and so on) and this is happening from the top down so theres no reason for it too go anywheres but down/

if it had imploded after being hit from the bottom then i would be more suspicous
Apr 16 2009 2:02PM
0 0
profile picture
mski
Posts: 4791 - Karma: 3,803
To the NSers it May Concern

this stuff is smart and good to know and understand, thats not called for by many people who just set the possibilities aside.

Im not saying believe it, just dont be ignornant
Apr 16 2009 2:23PM
0 0
profile picture
Morgen.
Posts: 1199 - Karma: 61
i didnt even watch it and i already knew it was worthless
Apr 16 2009 2:46PM
0 0
profile picture
Edew19
Posts: 365 - Karma: 13
what way exactly would you expect it to collapse?
Apr 16 2009 3:44PM
0 0
profile picture
q12
Posts: 152 - Karma: 9
ignorance is bliss
Apr 29 2009 6:55PM
0 0
profile picture
-Mugatu
Posts: 2579 - Karma: 84
you lost. gtfo.
Apr 29 2009 7:11PM
0 0
profile picture
El_Barto.
Posts: 11661 - Karma: 24,347
damn k only for going to 0
Apr 29 2009 7:14PM
0 0
profile picture
prontocuts.com
Posts: 5244 - Karma: 42
And you're the most ignorant one in this thread....
Apr 29 2009 7:15PM
0 0
profile picture
kepler.
Posts: 8761 - Karma: 139
*See signature.
Apr 29 2009 7:16PM
0 0
profile picture
q12
Posts: 152 - Karma: 9
thats what im talking about.  did you read the three government sponsored reports?  id bet my life no, so where do you get your news.... CNN.  or any other clear channel outlet.

thats a great way to go through life,never question anything, never listen to the other side of the argument.  just assume youre right even though youre probably arent an expert on the matter.

its 45 min of your life.
  i was the same way before someone finally convinced me to watch something like this. i thought no way in hell.  but if you could be mature for a second and listen to the opposing argument it might prove to be valid
Apr 29 2009 7:39PM
0 0
profile picture
debrickshaw
Posts: 1957 - Karma: 68
q12 your a fucking idiot

post in hear with your real profile you fucking pussy.
there is no conspiracy here, its just a bunch of pissed of muslims

anyone who thinks otherwise (aka you) is fucking retarded, plain and simple.
the same argument your making can be made to teach that evolution is fake, some scientists (aka religous nuts who think that they are scientists who got phd's at a fucking religious school) claim that the earth is 6000 years old with the bible as there evidence, and say that all fossils and theory's about evolution are fake products of the devil. the point i'm trying to make is, sure maybe 3 guys with phd's think 9/11 MIGHT be a conspiracy, but i'll bet that about 99.99 percent of professors and other people with phd's in this world know that it was a terrorist attack.  congrats, you found the .01 percent, therefore they are credible...

sparknotes: q12 is a retard
Apr 29 2009 7:50PM
0 1
profile picture
Six.0.Tree-ski
Posts: 4059 - Karma: 67
gtfo while you are only hated by few
Apr 29 2009 8:09PM
0 0
profile picture
babujib
Posts: 5039 - Karma: 104
wow he just dropped some knowledge on you, OP you feel stupid...
Apr 29 2009 8:19PM
0 0
All times are Eastern (-5)