Member of the Month

Biffbarf
February, 2025

Online

Welcome to the Newschoolers forums! You may read the forums as a guest, however you must be a registered member to post. Register to become a member today!

Hellbents vs JJs vs S7

profile picture
ReetsAdeets
Posts: 1531 - Karma: 611
 
Mar 4 2009 12:14AM
0 0
profile picture
ReetsAdeets
Posts: 1531 - Karma: 611
Im going 2 buy one of these skis. right now im leaning towards the Hellbents.
Mar 4 2009 12:16AM
0 0
profile picture
buchanan.
Posts: 1911 - Karma: 156

k well........ the hellbent has a full rocker and is flat under foot, has a waist of 122mm(or somthing around there) and no early taper.

the JJ...... is sick, picked up a pair this season, the dimensions of it are 126mm - 136mm - 115mm - 133mm - 121mm, they have early rise tip and tail. what i like about them is the amount of camber and side cut they give you under foot so you can still rip all over the mountain well. suuper light too. heres a pic of the early ride/camber.Click for larger image

and dont know toooo much about the S7, its more directional than both the hellbent and the JJ so it isnt going to do aswell switch. buuunch of rocker/early rise in the tips. think its around the same width as the JJ(?).

no_steeze has a sick review of the JJ that you should take a look at too

Mar 4 2009 12:28AM
0 0
profile picture
ReetsAdeets
Posts: 1531 - Karma: 611
kkool. my buddy has jjs. he loves em. i dont like reverse sidecut tho so...
Mar 4 2009 1:11AM
0 0
profile picture
Caveman.
Posts: 9067 - Karma: 330
None of the skis you listed have reverse sidecut.
Mar 4 2009 1:13AM
0 0
profile picture
Z_rob
Posts: 3076 - Karma: 152
spot on review ol' chap
Mar 4 2009 1:37AM
0 0
profile picture
Squid.
Posts: 1904 - Karma: 23
The JJ is way more versatile than the other two.
Mar 4 2009 7:37AM
0 0
profile picture
Balto
Posts: 26006 - Karma: 4,481
are JJs cap or sidewall construction?
Mar 4 2009 9:56AM
0 0
profile picture
Caveman.
Posts: 9067 - Karma: 330
Meh.. this depends on personal preference. I think for some people the S7 would be alot more versatile.
Mar 4 2009 11:21AM
0 0
profile picture
Squid.
Posts: 1904 - Karma: 23
I hear the S7s aren't as good riding switch
Mar 4 2009 11:26AM
0 0
profile picture
MEGAZORD
Posts: 4531 - Karma: -8
Thats not what versatility means.
Mar 4 2009 11:52AM
0 0
profile picture
schmies
Posts: 2032 - Karma: 511
JJ is indeed versatile, however, I still have never seen anybody skiing park on them.
Mar 4 2009 12:11PM
0 0
profile picture
Caveman.
Posts: 9067 - Karma: 330
I have!! They aren't nearly as popular in the park as Hellbents though. I have never seen anyone in the park on S7s though.
Mar 4 2009 12:14PM
0 0
profile picture
Squid.
Posts: 1904 - Karma: 23
A versatile ski is one that can handle a lot of different things. Riding switch is one of those things
Mar 4 2009 1:03PM
0 0
profile picture
Caveman.
Posts: 9067 - Karma: 330
Contrary to the NS opinion on what a good ski is, many people looking for a sweet pow ski could care less about going switch.
Mar 4 2009 1:06PM
0 0
profile picture
Squid.
Posts: 1904 - Karma: 23
Okay this is getting annoying. I said the JJ was a VERSATILE ski. All of the skis the OP listed are sweet pow skis, I just pointed out something that's good about the JJs. They handle everything well. How do you know the OP doesn't plan on riding switch in the pow?
Mar 4 2009 1:10PM
0 0
profile picture
whattheshit
Posts: 6562 - Karma: 107
it has both.   sidewall where the sidecut is and then tapers off to a cap construct.
Mar 4 2009 1:49PM
0 0
profile picture
buchanan.
Posts: 1911 - Karma: 156
Click for larger image

thats the sidewall, and this guy said, it runs along normal - cambered part of the ski.

Mar 4 2009 2:15PM
0 0
profile picture
ReetsAdeets
Posts: 1531 - Karma: 611
k, sweet, thanx

Mar 4 2009 6:21PM
0 0
profile picture
Luc.
Posts: 7540 - Karma: 59
for some reason the jj and the s7 dont seem that rockered even seen on snow...the hellbent however is HUGE. i dont know if this was just my eyes playin tricks on me cause i dont know of the specs of rocker for the jj and s7...

could anyone shed some light on which is softest?
Mar 4 2009 6:25PM
0 0
profile picture
Squid.
Posts: 1904 - Karma: 23
The Hellbent has way more rocker than the S7 and JJ. It also has much less camber
Mar 4 2009 6:29PM
0 0
profile picture
Luc.
Posts: 7540 - Karma: 59
yea thats what i figured thanks for the reinforcement.
Mar 4 2009 6:36PM
0 0
profile picture
JordanClarke
Posts: 998 - Karma: 1,922
man i have the JJ's SOOOO fun. there a supper sick ski buy em up!! but if its deep pow your shreddin then bents would be fun to. im gonna pick a pair up for next year for the deeeep days. But yeah i suggest go JJ's!!
Mar 4 2009 7:29PM
0 0
profile picture
bdieter1d3
Posts: 279 - Karma: 15
ive riddin the hellbents and the JJ's. and my take is that the JJ's are a way better ski, they are light yet strong. aggressive skiers can charge on them and they blow through crud like its nothing. the hellbents are ok, very sketchy at speeds on hard snow. i loved the JJ's wish i didnt have to sell them. however good luck finding them in a 185 which is really what you want if your over 5'7 150lbs or so.
Mar 4 2009 7:42PM
0 0
profile picture
Caveman.
Posts: 9067 - Karma: 330
Click for larger image
Mar 4 2009 9:07PM
0 0
profile picture
ReetsAdeets
Posts: 1531 - Karma: 611

I just got 169 Hellbents. i found 'em for a really good price and i love 'em.  thanks a lot for the info.

Click for larger image

Mar 14 2009 8:15PM
0 0
All times are Eastern (-4)